Ecology and Environment, Inc., Site Assessment Report
Item
of 1
- Media
- 000000254310.pdf
- Item sets
- Kenosha Iron & Metal Site
- Title
- Description
- Identifier
- Date Created
- References
- Format
- Creator
- Type
- Subject
- Publisher
- Date
- Rights
- Language
- Coverage
- Is Format Of
- extracted text
-
Ecology and Environment, Inc., Site Assessment Report
-
Ecology and Environment, Inc., conducts a site assessment at the Kenosha Iron and Metal site, evaluating human health and environment threats.
-
254310
-
1994-08-09 00:00:00.0
-
WID988574257
-
Kenosha Iron and Metal
-
PDF
-
Ecology and Environment, Inc.,
-
Administrative Record
-
Site Assessment
-
text
-
Human health
-
Environment
-
Kenosha Iron and Metal site
-
Environmental reporting
-
Midwest
-
Ecology and Environment, Inc.,
-
City of Kenosha
-
1994-08-09
-
eng
-
Kenosha, Wisconsin
-
PDF
-
EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.
254310
SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
KENOSHA IRON AND METAL
U.S. EPA ID: WID988574257
88 ID: NA
TDD: T05-9403-013B
PAN: EWI0423SAA
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in the Environment
SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
KENOSHA IRON AND METAL
,S. EPA ID: WID988574257
SS ID: NA
TDD: T05-9403-013B
PAN: EWI0423SAA
August 9, 1994
Prepared by:
Date:.
Reviewed by:
Date:.
Approved by
Date:
ecology and environment, inc.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD., CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604, TEL. 312-663-9415
International Specialists in the Environment
recycled paper
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1
2.0
SITE DESCRIPTION
1
3.0
SITE BACKGROUND
1
4.0
SITE ASSESSMENT
5
5.0
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
8
6. 0
DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL THREATS
15
6.1 Potential Exposure to Hazardous Substances...
6.2 Migration of Contaminants
6. 3 Weather Conditions
15
15
15
7.0
REMOVAL ACTION
16
8.0
ESTIMATED COST
16
Appendix
A
PHOTO LOG
A-l
B
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
B-l
C
XRF 920 FIELD DATA
C-l
D
FASP LABORATORY PCB DATA
D-l
E
RCMS 4.0 COST ESTIMATE
E-l
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
1
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR TOTAL METALS
12
2
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR TCLP METALS
13
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR PCBs
14
3 & 4
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
1
SITE LOCATION MAP
2
2
SITE FEATURES MAP
3
3
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
6
4
XRF 920 LEAD DATA FOR SITE SOILS
9
5
XRF 920 CHROMIUM DATA FOR SITE SOILS
10
6
FASP PCB DATA FOR SITE SOILS
11
1. 0
INTRODUCTION
Ecology & Environment, Inc. (E & E) , Technical Assist ?nce
Team (TAT) was tasked by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to conduct an site assessment under
Technical Directive Document (TDD) T05-9403-013 at the Kenosha
Iron and Metal (KIM) site and evaluate threats to human health
and the environment.
The site assessment was conducted in two phases: the first phase
on March 30, 1994, was to collect soil samples for chemical
analysis; and the second phase on May 9 through 12, 1994, was to
conduct a extent of contamination survey. The following report
provides a summary of these activities.
2.0
SITE DESCRIPTION
The KIM Site is located at 5512-5514 19th Avenue, Kenosha,
Kenosha County, Wisconsin (87° 37' 55" north, 41° 52' 50" west;
see Figure 1, Site Location Map) . The KIM site is located in an
industrial and low-income residential area. The facility is a
1.3 -acre abandoned scrap yard that was used for the reclamation
of batteries and metals and consists of an empty lot covered with
sparse vegetation with metal and other debris mixed with the
soil. A school is located on 55th Street approximately 100 feet
to the north and a second school is located two blocks south of
the site.
The site is unsecured, and the southeast corner of the property
is used as a shortcut for area residents and students of the two
nearby schools. The shortcut runs from 19th Avenue near the
Chicago and North Western railroad tracks to an empty lot at 1919
55th Street.
The scrap yard is
and by industrial
and North Western
scrap yard. East
bordered on the north and west by residences
property to the east and south. The Chicago
Railroad tracks border the south side of the
of the scrap yard is 19th Avenue.
Activities at the KIM site included the purchase and acceptance
of scrap metal, followed by sorting, sizing, and resale. Both
ferrous and non-ferrous metals were handled, with ferrous metals
being handled in the yard and non-ferrous metals handled in a
former warehouse. This warehouse and other on-site buildings
have been removed. Operation ceased at the site approximately in
the mid-1980' s.
3.0 SITE BACKGROUND
The property had been reportedly used for industrial purposes for
40 years. Prior to its use as a scrap yard, the property was
-ml
.
«
•> '
.».-•
_.
.Pit* .
' •£*** v/
.
• '
.
\
.
>
^
-•!
ecology and environment, Inc.
Technical Assistance Team
Region V
WISCONSIN
111 W. JtcMon Bind.. CBMgo. l»no»
SITE LOCATION MAP
KENOSHA IRON & METAL
STATl
WISCONSIN
TOO
T05-9403-013
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
USGS TOPO QUADRANGLE KENOSHA
REVISED
971
FIGURE 2
SITE FEATURES MAP
KENOSHA IRON & METAL KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
MARCH AND MAY 1994
LEGEND
RAUAOAO
PATH
FOMtER STRUCTURES
MOSSY AREA
TREES
•25+450
QRIO POINTS
SCALE J1 - 25'
fN
,/
.
.
.
I-
I
2
•
•
4
r
•
i
•
•
a2
f
'
r
• •
1
i'
/
VAULT
CHICAGO NW RAILROAD
•
1
,'
#
..— -
PATH
8UU»«
SCHOOL PROPERTY
•
. SHED
-25+75
5506
SCALE:
aULOING
150-t-O
0+0
-22+0
19lh AVILNUE
used as a coal storage yard by the Chicago Northwest Railway
Company (CNRCO). In 1948, CNRCO conveyed the property by quit
claim deed to the M & R Land Company. In 1955, the M & R Land
Company conveyed the property by warranty deed to Maurice sabin
as trustee. Sabin is a trustee of a land trust that now holds
title to the property. Sabin identified the current owners of
the land as Max Wolkomir, Shirley Halper, and Dorothy Berenson.
Reportedly the site was used as a scrap yard by a Mr. Ruppa from
an unknown date until 1983. In 1983, Sabin conveyed the property
by land contract to Harold R. and Roy M. Federman. In a letter
dated November 8, 1991, Harold Federman informed the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) that he had not fully
executed the land contract with trustee Sabin and that as a
result the ownership of the property reverted back to Sabin.
The Kenosha County Register of Deeds lists the Federmans as the
current owners. The tax key number of the property is 12-223-31334-021. According to county records the property is abandoned
and tax delinquent.
During its operation as a scrap yard, the KIM site reportedly
accepted batteries, electrical transformers, and ferrous and nonferrous metals for purchase and resale.
In 1988, an environmental consultant, Canow, Conibear &
Associates, LTD. (CCA), was retained by the City of Kenosha,
Wisconsin, to conduct an asbestos survey at the KIM Site. The
survey was performed on July 27, 1988. The survey included a
building with a connecting garage, a second building, and the
yard area. A total of 53 bulk asbestos samples were collected.
No asbestos-containing material was found in either of the
buildings. However, asbestos material was found on pipes in the
yard, in tile insulation, and in one soil sample.
In August, 1988, an environmental consultant, Foth & Van Dyke,
was retained by the City of Kenosha to perform an Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) of the KIM site. The ESA included a legal
description of the property and the collection and analysis of 43
soil samples from 9 soil borings. The analytical results of the
soil samples indicated elevated concentrations of lead up to
2,900 parts per million (ppm) and polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) up to 102 ppm. The Foth & Van Dyke report found that
there was evidence of significant environmental impairment at the
KIM site.
In 1990, the City of Kenosha razed and removed two buildings onsite. The city also removed deteriorating fencing, a concrete
scale, and metal debris. The asbestos-containing material was
removed with the debris.
On September 28, 1993, WDNR performed a Screening Site Inspection
(SSI) at the KIM site. The SSI included the collection of 18
soil samples fr-->m t^>e site and from private residences. The
results of the soil sampling at private residences indicated
elevated concentrations of cadmium (52.0 ppm and 61.6 ppm), and
lead (1,070 ppm). Soil samples collected on-site contained
concentrations of chromium (35,500 ppm), lead (3,380 ppm), and
total PCBs (1,140,000 parts per billion (ppb)).
WDNR representatives interviewed residents of properties
bordering the site, who indicated that following episodes of
heavy precipitation, there is significant runoff from the site to
the north and into the storm sewer on 55th Street that discharges
into Kenosha Harbor. According to census data gathered by WDNR,
the KIM Site is on the border between the Columbus Park census
tract (39% of the population below the federal poverty level),
and the Washington Park census tract (27.5% of the population
below the federal poverty level).
4.0
SITE ASSESSMENT
On March 30, 1994, TAT members John Nordine and Nabil Fayoumi met
with U.S. EPA On-Scene-Coordinator (OSC) Charles Gebien and Bill
Ramsey of WDNR at the KIM site. A site safety meeting was held
and the potential hazards of the site were discussed. A site
reconnaissance of the KIM site was completed, which included a
tour of the facility (see Appendix A for Site Photo Log).
To characterize the possible hazardous substances on-site the TAT
collected 15 soil samples, including a duplicate sample (see
Figure 3 Sample Location Map). Several sampling locations that
were chosen were close to previous WDNR sampling locations, from
WDNR's September 1993 site inspection, to provide confirmation of
previous sampling results. All soil samples were collected from
1 to 6 inches in depth with a shovel and/or a trowel. Prior to
sample collection the sampling equipment was washed with a brush
and a solution of alconox and distilled water and triple rinsed
with distilled water.
Soil sample SI was collected from the backyard of a residential
property at 2007 55th Street near a shed, 12 feet from the
southeast corner of the foundation. The sample location was near
the location of WDNR soil sample S01/S02. Soil sample S2 was
collected 40 feet east of the alley, in the southwest corner of
the site. Soil sample S3 was collected 27 feet south of the
southwest corner of the shed of the 2007 55th Street property.
Sample S3 was also collected WDNR samples S17 and S18. Soil
sample S4 was collected from the backyard of 1933 55th Street,
along the west fence 5 feet north of the southwestern corner of
the property boundary. The location of soil sample S4 was also
near the location WDNR soil sample S04. Soil sample S5 was
FIGURE 3 SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
KENOSHA IRON & METAL. KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
N
LEGEND
-- =VMLROAD
* WS3
"ATH
_
S1
WCNH SAMPLE LOCATION 9/28/93
SfTE ASSESSMENT SAMPLE LOCATION 3/30/94
<
; FORMER STRUCTURES
$
35
"~
MOSSY AREA
£
"^EES
0+450
125+460
'
v
"
"
'
ALLEY
'
§
• •
^^
AStrwSII
", < • '
, . •
i. . "-.=> •
.'*'• * '.
uT '^
'T
-/
'
i
—"
•"*
s3"
!
" wu
SMl STREET
GRID POINTS
SCALE .5' = 25'
'
»r^
•
S4
/
^\w»«
1
•
/•
/
-A"
.«^
^.^u
1
2001
|
VAULT
*
•
*
««•
*
A- /" ./ •/ •
i
«
•
•
* WM
• A
'•»
wtu;
* ;
tf ;
*«ii/
A
/ .'
i«n
'
iw»
1
mi
•
•
'
'
'
.
wwt A
»" A
W*HA,
;
wi3
(» •
PATH\
!
•
rnwr
••mm* •
, SHE)
BUUNNQ
»«•
-2S+75
f
;
:
I4JU
A
/\
*«•
1»+0 :
SCALE:
saoi
'
BULDfW
0+0
-22-H)
1MIAVCNU1
collected 48 feet south of the southeast corner of house at 1933
55th Street. Soil sample S6 was collected 6 feet south of the
southeast corner of the house at 1929 55th Street. Soil sample
S7 was collected 79.8 feet south of the fence in line with the
air conditioner of the house at 1929 55th Street. The location
of soil sample S7 was also near the location WDNR soil sample
S13.
Soil sample S8 was collected 108 feet south of the fence line in
line with the southwest corner of the house at 1929 55th Street.
Soil sample S9 was collected 21.5 feet from the private fence
line in line with the air conditioner of the house at 1933 55th
Street. Soil sample S9 was also collected near the location of
WDNR sample WS15. Soil sample S10 was collected 14 feet south of
the midpoint of the south side of the house at 1923 55th Street
foundation. The location of soil sample S10 was also near the
location of WDNR soil sample S20. Soil sample Sll was collected
53 feet south of the midpoint of the foundation of the house at
1913 55th Street, also near WDNR soil sample S12. Soil sample
S12 was collected 27 feet south of the southwest corner of the
house at 1913 55th Street in the path. Soil sample S13 was
collected 26 feet southeast of the corner of the foundation of
the house at 1913 55th Street. Soil sample S13 was also
collected near WDNR soil sample WS11. Soil samples S14 and S15
were collected 31 feet west of the light pole in the southeast
corner of the site, in the on-site path. Soil sample S14 and S15
was also collected near WDNR soil sample WS9. Soil sample S14
was a duplicate of soil sample S15.
The March 1994, soil samples were analyzed by Quality Analytical
Labs, Inc., 1938 C University Lane, Lisle, Illinois. The soil
samples were analyzed for total metals (samples SI through S15),
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for metals (SI
through S15), and PCBs (S2 through S10 and S13). Samples SI
through S15 were screened with a X-ray fluorescence (XRF) metal
analyzer.
A site-specific model was developed for the KIM Site.
The analytical data from soil samples SI through S15 for total
metals and the XRF screening data was used to developed a site
specific model. The following metals present at the site were
used in the model: barium, chromium, lead, and mercury.
XRF spectroscopy is a non-destructive qualitative and analytical
technique used to determine the elemental composition of samples.
As the XRF analyzes a sample, a spectrum of x-rays is generated
by all of the elements in the sample. Because a distinct x-ray
is emitted for each type of electron orbital transition, each
element will have many characteristic peaks in the spectrum. The
XRF instrument uses a multichannel microprocessor to collect the
x-ray spectrum given off by the sample, statistically processes
the data, and makes a qualitative identification and nondefinitive measurement of the elements present.
On May 2, 1994, the KIM site TDD was amended to require an
extent-of-contamination survey to be conducted so that a removal
action plan may be prepared. The survey would determine what
t=oils should be removed. The XRF Ottokompu Model 920 detector
(XRF 920) would be used to screen soil samples for site-specific
metals. The Field Analytical Support Program (FASP) mobile
laboratory, using a Varian 3400 gas chromatography with electron
capture detector would be used to screen the soil samples for
PCBs.
On May 9 through 12, 1994, TAT members John Nordine and Nabil
Fayoumi met with U.S. EPA On-Scene-Coordinator (OSC) Charles
Gebien and WDNR representative Bill Ramsey at the KIM site to
conduct phase II of the site assessment. A site safety meeting
was held and the potential hazards of the site were discussed.
An extent-of-contamination survey was conducted. The site was
divided into a grid with a spacing of 25 feet between grid
points.
Soil samples were collected at the nodes to a maximum depth of 2
feet. The soil samples were collected using either a pesthole
digger, a hand auger, a pick, and/or trowel. Prior to sample
collection the sampling equipment was washed with a brush and a
solution of alconox and distilled water and triple rinsed with
distilled water. Two samples were collected at each node point
of the grid, from 0 to 1 foot and 1 to 2 feet in depth. Samples
were not collected at depths greater than 2 feet due to buried
metal debris.
Each sample was screened using the XRF 920 to determine the
content of barium, chromium, lead, and mercury (see Figures 4 and
5, also see Appendix C for XRF data). The soil samples were also
screened for PCBs at the FASP mobile lab (see Figure 6 and
Appendix D for FASP PCB Data). Selected soil samples were sent
to Heritage Laboratories, Inc., 1319 Marquette Drive, Romeoville,
Illinois, for PCB, pesticides, and herbicides analysis.
5.0
ANALYTICAL
RESULTS
Results of the TAT collected samples revealed the presence of
Total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals;
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP); and PCBs (see
Appendix B for data quality assurance review). See Tables 1, 2,
3, and 4 for summaries of analytical data results.
For soil samples collected in March 1994, sampling results for
total metals indicated cadmium (120 ppm) in sample S2; chromium
(12,000 ppm) in sample S10; lead (12,000 ppm) in sample S13; and
mercury (5.4) in sample S3. TCLP metals results indicated
cadmium at 1.0 milligrams per liter (mg/1) in sample S13 and lead
at 43 mg/1 in sample S13. Total concentrations of PCBs in soils
results ranged from 6.2 to 55 ppm in samples S9 and S10.
8
FIGURE 4
XRF 920. LEAD DATA FROM SOIL SAMPLES, MAY 1994
KENOSHA IRON & METAL. KENOSHA. WISCONSIN
N
-EGEND
- - - - nAILROAD
L£AO IN opm
0-1 FOOT
PATH
3
1-2 FEET
DORMER STRUCTURES
HI
CR BOL = SB.OW DETECTION UMtT
MOSSY AREA
2
TREES
123+450
0+450
an.
MJO
MOO
VX.
' WfO
I
utt
SOL
an.
"M
900
GRID POINTS
SCALE ;• = 25'
un
suo
tft»
tat
UM
M*>
tat
Ml*
ax
VAULT
PBOPERTV UN6
»••
'•1ft
ITM •
9T«
<ao
HO
MM
MM
lit
BOL
1141
PATH
•••
ai*
m*
BUU>MQ
•Z5+0
SCMJ:
47M i
150+0
aULDMQ
0+0
-22+0
FIGURE 5
XRF 920, CHROMIUM DATA FROM SOIL SAMPLES, MAY 1994
KENOSHA IRON & METAL KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
LEGEND
FIGURES
FASP PCS DATA FOR SOIL SAMPLES, MAY 1994
KENOSHA IRON & METAL KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
LEGEND
N
-- RAILflOAD
PC8 IN opm
0-1 FOOT
PATH
1-2 FEET
OR BOL - BELOW DETECTION UMfT
MOSSY AREA
TREES
12S+450
0+450
V,
'V .'' /.i
.
GRID POINTS
5"~M_E 5' - ""51
11
,/[
: i
'
'.
ML
—
7
i
(
V
"— ""
., T/ " " *
M
J1
it
ML
§ ^s
£
>•
i
i
I
1i
/
3k
«
M
i
M
H
11
.'IV
'»
.' tt
•
/
*•
1
UNB
;"
|'
;.
/
I .
;
i
;
n
a
':
•
:
1
<•
:
•
X
•
0
/
«»•
•
/
/
^
/ML
I »•»•
/ ML
•
. »
M
i• / »/ -
:
i
:
I
;
/
IT
•'•
•
/ a
/
/
11 •
»•
™
....Z
.•' '»»
11
u
«•
if
•»
11
ML
t-i*
ML
•
•• '
•
it
ML
vi*
ML
.
•ATM
M
>•
!•
K*
•
a
a
-vc«
ML
t
:
TUMI
ML
!•
ML
•
7
ML
•V
';
It
•
1*
«•
ML
M, ii:
:
S
^~
|
•
»-t*
BULONO
§
•'
/
9
VAULT
-V%
.^
Vlf
t
14
M
J-l»
ML
7
"^SHBJ
-IT
ML •
.
H
sr**"
r
'
SCAU
•
l
ML
•
1
saM
0UU)MO
1MIAVBUI
TABLE 1
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR TOTAL METALS
AT THE KBNOSHA IRON i METAL SITE
KBN08HA, WISCONSIN
MARCH 30, 1994
SAMPLE
AMBER
PARAMETER
SI
S2
ARSENIC
U
U
IAR1UM
510
CADMIUM
60
CHROMIUM
LEAD
4ERCURY
500
2,300
1.6
m
;**'
^•--:
37
58
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15*
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5.2
U
500
760
650 2,400
400
540
700
1,000
730
880
21
91
51
55
38
45
98
19
25
56 1,100
880
350 12,000
450
210
7,500
130
160
2,200 2.200 2,500 12,000 1,300
1,700
SS
S6
U
U
870 1.000 200
850
86
11
84
430 1,400
50
280
120
U
U
6.3
t,200 4.000 S80
0.62
5.4 0.27
78
5,400 1,100 4,900 2,300 5.000
0.73
0.13
0.91
1.2
0.7
0.4
0.93
0.73
0.47
SELENIUM
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
SILVER
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Units - parts per m i l l i o n (ppra)
U = Non Detect
* Duplicate soil sample of S14
12
2.7
24
U
2.9
U
U
TABLE 2
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR TCLP METALS
AT THE KENOSHA IRON & METAL SITE
KENO8HA, WISCONSIN
March 30, 1994
SAMPtf
HUMER
'AMMETER
61
52
iB
-: •?$>
lit-
w
55
86
S7
$8
S9
$10
S11
S12
S13
$14
S15*
RWUUTOr
LEVEL
CADMIUM
0.008
0.65
0.41
0.051
0.63
U
0.54
0.19
0.27
0.37
0.23
0.47
1.0
0.11
0.19
1.0
CHROMIUM
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5.0
LEAD
U
3.6
1.6
0.11
1.5
0.16
1.5
0.43
0.8
3.3
1.6
2.0
43
0.27
0.81
5.0
4ERCURY
U
0.1
0.013
0.02 A
0.011
0.094
0.084
0.025
0.19
0.018
0.097
0.019
0.049
0.018
0.04
0.2
Units = parts per million (pp»)
U = Not Detected
* Duplicate soil sample of S14
13
TABLE 3
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR PCBs
AT THE KENOSHA IRON t METAL SITE
KBN08HA, WISCONSIN
MARCH 30, 1994
SAMPLE
NUMBER
*i
32
m*^ *'
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S12
S10
PARAMETER
PCB 1248
U
U
11
39
53
U
23
U
55
U
PCB 1254
23
16
U
U
U
31
U
6.2
U
32
TOTAL
PCBs
23
39
53
31
23
6.2
55
32
.
^ -11
Units = parts per million (ppm)
U = Not Detected
TABLE 4
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR PCBs
AT THE KENOSHA IRON i METAL SITE
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
MAY 1994
SAHPIE NUMBER
PARAMETER
S4
S22
540
S44
S51
S68
871
S90
S112
S122
PC8 1248
35
21
52
35
53
10
280
36
110
27
PCB 1254
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
32
PCS 1260
1.6
13
5.3
7.8
5.4
15
19
46
82
14
36.6
34
57.3
42.8
58.4
25
299
82
192
41
TOTAL PCBs
Units = parts per m i l l i o n (ppm)
U = Not Detected
14
Total PCB results for soil samples collected in May 1994, soil
sampling results for indicated total PCBs at 299 ppm in soil
sample SV.
Pesticide results for soil samples collected in May
1994, chlordane was indicated in soil sample S48 at 35,000 ppm.
6.0
DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL THREATS
Conditions at the KIM site that may warrant a removal action, as
set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of Section 300.415 of 40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), the National Contingency Plan (NCP),
include:
6.1
1.
Actual or potential exposure to nearby human
populations, animals, or the food chain from
hazardous substances or pollutants or
contaminants;
2.
High levels of hazardous substances or pollutants
or contaminants in soils largely at or near the
surface, that may migrate; and
3.
Weather conditions that may cause hazardous
substances or pollutants or contaminants to
migrate or be released.
Potential Exposure To Hazardous Substances
Site investigations and analytical data obtained by WDNR and the
TAT have identified surface and subsurface soils containing
materials that possess characteristics of hazardous wastes, as
defined by RCRA, at the KIM site. Total concentrations of PCBs
in soil sample S71 indicated 299 mg/kg. PCBs are known
carcinogens and are toxic substances; children are particularly
at risk. TCLP metals were detected above the RCRA regulatory
limit for cadmium (1 mg/1) and lead (5 mg/1). In soil sample
S13, cadmium (1.0 mg/1) and lead (43 mg/1) were detected in onsite soils above the RCRA TCLP regulatory limits. Cadmium may
cause irritation to the nose and throat. Lead is a suspected
carcinogen. Parts of the site are used by children and local
residents as a shortcut; these persons could be at risk. The
site is sparsely vegetated, increasing the chance of off-site
migration of contaminated particulates via strong winds.
6.2
Migration of Contaminants
Site investigations have documented the presence at the KIM site
of chemicals associated with scrap metal recycling (lead
batteries and transformers) and heavy metals that were above the
RCRA regulatory limits for cadmium and lead (1 and 5 mg/L,
respectively) in surface soil samples. The site is sparsely
vegetated. PCBs were detected in surface soil samples at
concentrations above Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)
15
regulatory limit of 50 ppm with the highest concentration in
sample S71 at 299 mg/kg. Contaminants may migrate off site
during dry windy conditions hv airborne dusts or by storm run-off
during rain events. Resident's homes are adjacent to the site to
the north and a school is located across 55th Street.
6.3
Weather Conditions
PCBs and heavy metals have been found at the KIM site in surface
soil at concentrations above RCRA regulatory levels. The site is
sparsely vegetated. Migration of contaminated soils by airborne
particulates is possible during periods of dry, dusty conditions.
Migration of contaminated soils during storm events is possible
due to erosion of the surface soils. Storm runoff from the site
is to the north and into the storm sewer on 55th Street that
discharges into Kenosha Harbor.
7.0
REMOVAL ACTION
The site assessment has documented the presence of hazardous
substances at the KIM site. These substances were detected in
samples of soil, which were found to contain materials that
possess characteristics of hazardous wastes, as defined by RCRA.
The site is unsecured and accessible, and children and the public
are known to use the property as a shortcut. Based on the
findings of the site assessment, a time-critical removal action
at the KIM site would reduce or eliminate immediate threats to
human health and the environment.
8.0
ROMS 4.0 COST PROJECTION
Removal cost estimates for off-site disposal were projected using
the U.S. EPA Removal Cost Management System (RCMS) program. Cost
estimates to mitigate threats due to on-site contaminated
materials contained in the soil are based on the following
assumptions:
1.
There is a total of approximately 6,078 cubic
yards of heavy metal contaminated soils onsite. This estimated amount was generated
assuming that the 1.3-acre site may show
contamination to a depth of at least 3 feet.
2.
There is a total of approximately 417 cubic
yards of soils contaminated with PCBs at
concentrations greater than 50 ppm which will
require disposal at a TSCA approved landfill
at an approximate cost of $300.00 per cubic
yard ;
16
3.
Soil exhibiting TCLP cadmium and lead
concentrations greater than 1 and 5 mg/1,
respectively, will require stabilization
either on-site or off-site and transportation
to an appropriate RCRA-permitted off-site
landfill. If the soil also exhibits a PCB
concentration of greater than 50 mg/kg prior
stabilization, the soil will be stabilized
and disposed of at a TSCA-approved landfill
at an approximate cost of $20.00 per cubic
yard ;
4.
The excavated area of the site will be
backfilled with clean soils and graded to
prevent ponding of water; and
5.
Site security will be improved by
constructing a 6-foot chain-link security
fence topped with barbed wire and two 10-foot
gates. A total of 1,120 feet of fence
material will be needed at a cost of
$16,800.00, including installation.
The cost estimates for the cleanup are based on 60 12-hour days
by the Emergency Response Cleanup Support (ERCS) contractor
Riedel Environmental Services, and is projected to cost
$767,144.28. See Appendix E for the RCMS cost estimate.
17
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1112
DIRECTION:
SOUTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
OESCR: SE VIEW OF SITE, NOTE LACK OF
VEGETATION & SURVEY POINTS
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1112
DIRECTION:
SOUTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: SE VIEW OF SITE, NOTE LACK OF
VEGETATION & SURVEY POINTS
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1112
DIRECTION:
NORTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: NE VIEW OF SITE. NOTE LACK OF
VEGETATION & SURVEY POINTS
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1113
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: THE BACKYARD OF 2007 55th
STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME- 1114
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: THE BACKYARD OF 1933 55th
STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1114
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: DRIVE BETWEEN 1933 AND 1929
55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME- 1113
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: THE BACKYARD OF 2001 55th
STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1116
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: DRIVE BETWEEN 2001 AND 1933
55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IROM t METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
UI5
D I SECTION:
NORTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
OESCR: BACKYARD OF 1933 55th STREET
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & HETAL
DATE: 5/11/94
TIME: 1709
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
D<:SCR: DRIVEWAY BETWEEN 1929 AND 1923
55th STREET.
SITE:
KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1116
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: BACKYARD OF 1923 55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1117
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: BACKYARD OF 1913 55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1117
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: SOUTH SIDE OF 5506 19th
AVENUE.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1117
DIRECTION:
NORTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: BACKYARD OF 5506 19th AVENUE..
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1119
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: SCHOOL LOCATED AT THE CORNER
OF 19th AVENUE & 55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1117
DIRECTION:
SOUTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: NOTE SCHOOL IN BACKGROUND
2-STORY BROWN BRICK BUILDING
I
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1117
DIRECTION:
SOUTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: EMPTY LOT AND PATH THROUGH
SITE AT 1919 55th STREET.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1709
DIRECTION: EAST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NOROINE
OESCR: VIEU OF SITE LOOKING NORTHEAST
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1709
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: VIEW OF THE WESTERN PART OF
THE SITE.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1110
DIRECTION: EAST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: VIEU OF SITE LOOKING EAST
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1110
DIRECTION: NORTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: NE VIEU OF SITE. NOTE LACK OF
VEGETATION & SURVEY POINTS
SITE: KENOSHA IRON ft METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME- 1300
DIRECTION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: SCHOOL ACROSS 55th STREET
NORTH OF THE SITE.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON ft METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1305
DIRECTION:
SOUTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: BUSINESS LOCATED SOUTH AND
EAST OF THE SOUTH.
SITE: KEMOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1700
DIRECTION: EAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: VIEW OF SITE LOOKING EAST.
NOTE WARNING SIGN.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 5-11-94
TIME: 1709
DIRECTION: EAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: VIEW OF SITE LOOKING NORTHEAST
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1050
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN WORDIWE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE 51
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1055
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S2
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1105
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER .-JOHN NOROINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S3
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1115
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S4 IN
1933 55th STREET BACKYARD
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1125
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN MORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S5
SITE: KENOSHA IRON i METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1130
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S6
SITE: KENOSHA I ROM & HETAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1KO
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER-.JOHN NORDIME
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S7
SITE: KENOSHA IRON S METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME- 1145
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORD1NE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S8
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
TIME: 1150
DATE: 3-30-94
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHM NORDINE
OESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S9
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1159
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S10
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1205
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S11
SITE: KENOSHA IRON C METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1210
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE 512
SITE: KENOSHA IRON t METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1220
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S13
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1240
DIRECTION: EAST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLE S14
AND SIS
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1245
DIRECTION: NORTHUEST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: PERSON USUC THE PATH THROUGH
THE SITE.
SITE: KENOSHA IRON i METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME: 1215
DIRECTION: NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NOROIHE
DESCR: LIFETIME BATTERY CASING AND
SKELETON OF SMALL ANIMAL
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: J-50-94
T1HE:
1000
DIRECTION:
SOUTHEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER:JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: V I E W Of S I T E LOOKING SOUTEAST,
NOTE LACK OF V E G E T A T I O N
SITE: KENOSHA IRON & M E T A L
DATE: 3-30-94
TIME:
1000
DIRECTION:
NORHTEAST
PHOTOCRAPHER:JOHN NORDINt
DFSCR: HOMES ALONG THE NORTH SlOf OF
THE SITE.
SlU:
ICtNOSHA IRON & METAL
DATE: i-30-9^.
TIME:
1000
DIRECIION:
NORTH
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORD1NE
OESCR: AREA WHERE MAIN B U I L D I N G AND
SCALES WERE LOCATED.
SITE:
KENOSHA IRON & M E T A L
DATE:
3-30-94
TIME:
1000
DIRECMON:
SOUTUWLSI
P H O T O G R A P H E R : JOHN NPRD1NE
PEr>rR: LAND USE I O C A T I P TO T i l F SOUTH
MD
UEST OF THf SI II .
S I T E : KENOSIIA IRON £ M E T A L
TIME:
1000
DATL: 3-30-94
DIRECIiuN:
EAST
f-HGIUu&AHlER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: VIEW OF SITE LOOKING EAST,
NOTE LACK OF V E G E T A T I O N
S I T F : KFNOSHA IRON & MUAL
D A 1 E : 3 30-9i
1IMF:
DIRECTION:
NORHTEAS1
PHOlOCSAPHtR: JO»S NORD1NE
PrSfR: HOMCS AIONC THF N O R T H SU'f
sni.. NOIF LACK of vrr.i IAI \
SITE: KENOSHA IRON I METAL
DATE: 3-30-94
TIHE:
1000
DIRECTION:
NORHTEAST
PHOTOGRAPHER: JOHN NORDINE
DESCR: HOMES ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
THE SITE.
APPENDIX B
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
ecology and environment, inc,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.. CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604. TEL. 312 663-9415
international Specialists in the Environment
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
June 6, 1994
TO:
John Nordine, TAT-Project Manager, E & E, Chicago, IL
FROM:
Karen Smith, TAT-Chemist, E & E, Detroit, OH
THRU:
Sandra L. Basham, ATATL, E & E, Detroit, MI
SUBJ:
Total Metals Analyses Data Quality Assurance Review,
Kenosha Iron & Metal Site, Kenosha, Kenosha County,
Wisconsin
REF:
Analytical TDD:T05-9403-810
Analytical PAN:EWI0423AAA
Project TDD:T05-9403-013
Project PAN:EWI0423FAA
The data quality assurance review of fifteen soil samples
collected from the Kenosha Iron & Metal site is complete. The
samples were collected March 30, 1994, by the Technical
Assistance Team Contractor, Ecology and Environment (E & E). The
samples were submitted to Quality Analytical Labs, Inc., Lisle,
Illinois. Laboratory analysis was performed according to SW-846
methods 6010 and 7471.
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Lab #
940680-01
940680-02
940680-03
940680-04
940680-05
940680-06
940680-07
940680-08
940680-09
940680-10
940680-11
940680-12
940680-13
.940680-14
940680-15
-ecvcied paper
E & E f
SI
S2
S3
S4
55
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
Sll
S12
S13
S14
S15
Data Qualifications
I
Sample Holding Time; Acceptable
Samples were collected on March 30, 1994, and the laboratory
received the samples on March 31, 1994. Digestion was
performed on April 7, 1994. The analyses for total and TCLP
metals were completed on April 11, 1994, well within the
recommended holding time (6 months for metals, 28 days for
mercury).
II
Initial and Continuing Calibrations;
Acceptable
Initial and Continuing calibrations were within the
recommended limits of 90%-110% of the true values for
metals, 80%-120% of the true values for mercury.
III
Blanks;
Acceptable
Calibration blanks and preparation blanks were analyzed with
the samples.. All analyte concentrations were below
instrument detection limits (BDL).
IV
ICP Interference Check Samples: Acceptable
All interference check sample results were within the
recommended control limits of plus-or-minus 20%.
V
Performance Evaluation Samples;
VI
Additional PC Checks;
Not Applicable
Acceptable
All matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) results had
percent recoveries (R%) between 81-91% of the true values.
VII
Overall Assessment of Data for Use : Acceptable
The overall usefulness of the data is based on the criteria
outlined in OSWER Directive 9360.4-01 (April 1990), Data
Validation Procedures, Section 3.0, Metallic Inorganic
Parameters and Section 2.7, Quality Assurance Requirements
for QA Level II work.
Based upon the information provided, the data are acceptable
for use as reported.
ecology and environment, inc.
12251 UNIVERSAL. T A Y L O R . MICHIGAN 48180. TEL. 3131 946-0900
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
TO:
June 6, 1994
John Nordine, TAT-Project Manager, E & E Chicago, IL
FROM:
Karen Smith, TAT-Chemist, E & E, Detroit, MI #".
THRU:
Sandra L. Basham, ATATL, E & E, Detroit, Ml
SUBJ:
PCB Analysis Data Quality Assurance Review, Kenosha
Iron & Metal Site, Kenosha, Kenosha County, Wisconsin.
REF:
Project TDD:T05-9403-013
Project PAN:EWI0423FAA
Analytical TDD:T05-9403-810
Analytical PAN:EWI0423AAA
The data quality assurance review of ten soil samples
collected from the Kenosha Iron & Metal Site is complete. The
samples were collected March 30, 1994, by the Technical
Assistance Team Contractor, Ecology and Environment (E & E). The
samples were submitted to Quality Analytical Labs, Inc, Lisle,
Illinois. Laboratory analysis was performed according to SW-846
method 8080 for the determination of PCB compounds and their
corresponding concentrations.
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Lab
940680-02
940680-03
940680-04
940680-05
940680-06
940680-07
940680-08
940680-09
940680-10
940680-12
recycled pacer
tt
E & E »
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S12
Data Qualifications
I
Sample Holding Time; Acceptable
Samples were collected on March 30, 1994, and received by
the laboratory on March 31, 1994. Extraction was completed
on April 10, 1994, and the analysis was performed on April
21, 1994, meeting the specified holding time (14 days to
extract and 40 days to analyze).
II
Instrument Performance;
Acceptable
All standards and resulting chromatograms had both adequate
peak separation and shifts in the retention time windows
were less than 0.3% for capillary columns.
III
Initial and Continuing Calibration;
Qualified
All Aroclors were calibrated using a 5-point calibration on
April 13, 1994. Relative standard deviations were all >
10%, except for Aroclor 1221. All positive sample results
for Aroclors other than 1221 have been flagged as estimates
(J).
Continuing calibrations were performed using all Aroclors.
The percent differences (%D) for all Aroclors were < 15%.
IV
Blanks; Acceptable
A method blank was analyzed with the samples. All compound
concentrations were below the practical quantitation limits
(BPQL).
V
Compound Identification; Acceptable
All peaks are compared against the appropriate standard
chromatograms as identified by the laboratory. All sample
chromatograms were verified for agreement with the standard
chromatograms and all retention time windows agree.
According to the laboratory narrative, all of the PCB
samples showed weathered mixtures of PCBs. Since
differention was difficult the lab calculated the total area
as the dominant aroclor for each sample.
VI
Compound Ouantitation and Reported Detection
Limits;Acceptable
All reported data has accounted for dilutions,
concentrations, splits, cleanup procedures, dry weight
factors, and any other factors not accounted for by the
method.
VII
Performance Evaluation Samples; Not Applicable
'eCVCled paper
,., ni<ig> and envmmmrni
VIII Optional PC Checks; Acceptable
Surroqates were added to the sample and all recoveries were
within the laboratory established limits of 60-150%.
IX
Overall Assessment of Data for Use: Acceptable
The overall usefulness of the data is based on the criteria
outlined in OSWER Directive 9360.4-01 (April 1990), Data
Validation Procedures, Section 7.0, PCBs and Section 2.7,
Quality Assurance Requirements for QA Level II work.
Based upon the information provided, the data are acceptable
for use as reported.
Data Qualifiers and Definitions
J -
The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
because the reported concentrations were less than the
contract required detection limits or quality control
criteria were not met.
'SCVCIefl Oaper
t-nl<ie\ aim rruimnmem
QUALITY
1 ANALYTICAL
LABS, INC.
Final Report
April 21, 1994
Ecology & Environment, Inc.
Ill W. Jackson Blvd., 12th floor
Chicago, IL 60604
ATTN:
Mary Jane Ripp
Chain of Custody #: 5-23185
Project Name & #:
T05-9403-013 ; Proj . #EWI0723SAA
Sampling Date:
03/30/94
Please find enclosed
samples :
OAL Lab ID
940680-01
940680-02
940680-03
940680-04
940680-05
940680-06
940680-07
940680-08
the Analytical
Report
for the
following
Sample Description
51, 12' S 2007th 55th WDNRS02
52, 40' E of alley SW corner site
S3, 27' SE of 2007th 55th shed
S4, Backyard fence 1933 55th SO4
S5, 48' S 1933 SE corner of house
S6, 6' S of SE Corner of 1929 55th
S7, 79.8' S 1929 fence ac
S8, 108' S of 1929 SW
house corner fence
S9, 21.5' S fence i.e. 1925 55th ac
14' S of mid pt 1923 55th
Sll 53' S of mid pt 1913
S12 27' S of 1913 mid pt in path
S13 26' S of SW corner 1913 55th
S14 S14 SE corner of site
S15 31' W of light pole
940680-09
940680-10
940680-11
940680-12
940680-13
940680-14
940680-15
FINAL REPORT.
Note: All PCS samples showed weathered mixtures of two to three
arochlors.
Differention was difficult
so total area was
quantitated as dominant arochlor in each sample.
If you have any questions please contact Mike Kimmel at our
laboratories.
Respectfully submitted,
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
John Boudreau
Laboratory Director
sy:EC940680
"Precision, Accuracy and Service"
1938C UNIVERSITY LANE
LISLE, IL 60532
•
708 / 512-0061
FAX 708 / 512-0089
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 16
Sample ID:
SI.
940680-01
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.10
Hg- Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
60.
500.
2300.
U
U
510.
1.6
04/11/94
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/13/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 3 of 16
Sample ID:
52.
940680-02
Digestion Date:
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.070
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
120.
430.
4200.
U
U
870.
0.62
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 3
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
04/11/94
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0 .083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
U
23.
U
U
U
J-
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 4 of 16
Sample ID:
S3,
940680-03
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
PQL
Parameter
mg/Kg
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.10
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/13/94
U
86.
1400.
4000.
U
U
1000.
5.4
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 5
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
SH846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
U
16.
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 5 of 16
Sample ID:
S4.
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-04
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
PQL
Parameter
mg/Kg
5.0
Arsenic
1.0
Cadmium
Chromium
1.5
Lead
5.0
20.
Selenium
Silver
5.0
Barium
1.0
Mercury
0.060
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Analysis
Date
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
6.3
11.
50.
680.
U
U
200.
0.27
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 21
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
SW846 8080
Analysis Date.- 04/21/94
0.083
0 .083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
11.
U
U
U
U
T
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 6 of 16
Sample ID:
35.
940680-05
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.06
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
U
84.
280.
3400.
U
U
850.
0.73
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 5
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
39.
U
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 7 of 16
Sample ID:
S6.
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-06
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
5.0
Arsenic
1.0
Cadmium
Chromium
1.5
5.0
Lead
100.
Selenium
5.0
Silver
1.0
Barium
0.070
Mercury
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
21.
56.
1100.
U
U
500.
0.13
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 24
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
04/11/94
Analysis
Date
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
53 .
U
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 8 of 16
Sample ID:
S7.
940680-07
Digestion Date:
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
1.0
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
0. 060
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
91.
1100.
4900.
U
U
760.
0.91
04/11/94
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 4
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
Method:
0.083
0. 083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
SW846 8080
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
U
31
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 9 of 16
Sample ID:
S8.
940680-08
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.11
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/13/94
U
51.
880.
2300.
U
U
650.
1.2
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 5
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
23.
U
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 10 of 16
Sample ID:
SB.
940680-09
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
50.
10.
15.
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.060
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
U
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
78.
350.
5000.
U
U
2400.
0.70
FCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 19
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
04/11/94
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
U
6.2
€
U
U
U
J
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 11 of 16
Sample ID:
S10.
940680-10
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 10
Extraction Date
Parameter
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
50.
U
10.
55.
12000.
15.
50.
2200.
U
200.
U
5.0
400.
1.0
0.060
0.40
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Project #940680
Method:
04/10/94
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
PQL (mg/Kg)
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0 .083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
55
U
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 12 of 16
Sample ID:
511.
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-11
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
PQL
Parameter
mg/Kg
25.0
Arsenic
Cadmium
1.0
1.5
Chromium
5.0
Lead
100.
Selenium
5.0
Silver
1.0
Barium
0.060
Mercury
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
38.
450.
2200.
U
U
540.
0.93
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
Analysis
Date
04/11/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories,
Page 13 of 16
Sample ID:
Inc. Project #940680
512. 940680-12
Digestion Date: 04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
50.
10.
15.
50.
200.
50.
10.
0.060
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Barium
Mercury
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
Method
SW846-
Analysis
Date
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
U
45.
210.
2500.
U
U
700.
0.73
PCBs Analysis
% Moisture: 18
Extraction Date: 04/10/94
Method:
Parameter
PQL (mg/Kg)
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
Aroclor
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
1268
SW846 8080
Analysis Date: 04/21/94
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
Dry Weight
Analysis (mg/Kg)
U
U
U
U
U
32.
U
U
U
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 14 of 16
Sample ID:
S13,
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-13
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
100.
Arsenic
10.
Cadmium
Chromium
15.
50.
Lead
Selenium
200.
Silver
50.
Barium
10.
Mercury
0.060
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
98 .
7500.
12000.
U
U
1000.
0.47
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
Analysis
Date
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 15 of 16
Sample ID:
S14.
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-14
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
PQL
Parameter
mg/Kg
5.0
Arsenic
Cadmium
1.0
Chromium
1.5
5.0
Lead
Selenium
20.
5.0
Silver
1.0
Barium
Mercury
0.11
Hg-Digestion Date:
Analysis
mg/Kg
5.2
19.
130.
1300.
24.
U
730.
2.7
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
04/11/94
Analysis
Date
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/13/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 16 of 16
Sample ID:
S15.
Digestion Date:
Project #940680
940680-15
04/07/94
TOTAL RCRA METALS (soil)
Parameter
PQL
mg/Kg
Arsenic
50.
1.0
Cadmium
Chromium
1.5
Lead
5.0
Selenium
20.
5.0
Silver
1.0
Barium
Mercury
0.10
Hg-Digestion Date:
04/11/94
Analysis
mg/Kg
U
Analysis
Date
04/11/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/08/94
04/11/94
04/11/94
04/13/94
25.
160.
1700.
U
U
880.
2.9
Method
SW8466010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
- Defined Data Qualifiers
B
Compound detected in blank (Normalized concentration)
C
Used when blank value exceeds half of the CRDL (PQL).
Pesticide result confirmed by GC/MSD
D
Compound identified in analysis at a secondary dilution factor
E
Used when two or more dilutions of a sample are needed to acquire valid data.
Compounds concentration exceeds calibration range
Used when upper level of calibration curve is exceeded by 10%. Analyses greater than 50% of upper calibration level are
reanalyzed at a higher dilution.
J
P
U
X
Estimated value. Compound detected below the CRDL (PQL).
Pesticide or Aroclor analysis where results between analytical and confirmation columns is > 25%.
Compound analyzed for but not detected at or above the CRDL (PQL).
NON-Specific flag • See definition at the end of the report
Data Validation
NJ
Presumptive evidence of presence of material at an estimated quantity.
Used when QA/QC failures are present AND data is true. Must be accompanied by NCR
PND
R
RND
Precision Not Determined
Used when non-approved methods are used to obtain data.
Reported value is unusable due to gross QA/QC deficiencies.
Recovery Not Determined
Used when non-approved methods are used to obtain data.
UJ
Compound analyzed for but not detected, reported detection limit estimated because QA/QC criteria
were not met.
Detection LJmit Definitions
CRDL
IDL
Contract Required Detection Limits = Detection limits specified by client or agency
Based on wet weight analysis
Instrument Detection Limit
Statistically derived detection limit from 7 + analyses of a low level standard near but above the estimated Method Detection
MDL
Limit.
Method Detection Limit
Instrument Detection Limit
PQL
X End Volume (specified by the method) / Mass, Volume or Area of the Sample [specified by the
method) (Based on wet weight analysis)
Practical Quantitation Limit
Method Detection Limit
analysis)
X End Volume (analytical)
/ Mass, Volume or Area of the Sample [analytical) (Based on wet weight
ecology and environment, inc.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD , CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604. TEL. 312 663-9415
international Specialists in the Environment
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
June 23, 1994
TO:
John Nordine, TAT-Project Manager, E & E, Chicago, IL
FROM:
David Hendren, TAT, E & E, Chicago, IL
THRU:
Mary Jane Ripp, Analytical Services Coordinator, E & E,
Chicago,IL
SUBJ:
selected TCLP Metals Data Quality Assurance
Review, Kenosha Iron & Metal site, Kenosha, Kenosha
County, Wisconsin
REF:
Analytical TDD:T05-9403-810
Analytical PAN:EWI0423AAA
Project TDD:T05-9403-013
Project PAN:EWI0423FAA
The data quality assurance review of fifteen soil samples
collected from the Kenosha Iron & Metal site is complete. The
samples were collected March 30, 1994, by the Technical
Assistance Team Contractor, Ecology and Environment (E & E). The
samples were submitted to Quality Analytical Labs, Inc., Lisle,
Illinois. Laboratory analysis was performed according to SW-846
methods 6010 and 7470 for the selected metals, Cadmium, Chromium,
Lead, and Mercury.
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Lab *
940680-01
940680-02
940680-03
940680-04
940680-05
940680-06
940680-07
940680-08
940680-09
940680-10
940680-11
940680-12
940680-13
; ecycled paper
E & E #
SI
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
Sll
S12
S13
940680-14
940680-15
S14
S15
Data Qualifications;
I.
Holding Tine: Acceptable
The samples were collected on 3/30/94, subjected to TCLP
extraction on 4/22/94, digested on 4/27/94 and analyzed on
4/28/94. Samples were extracted for mercury on 4/20/94 and
analyzed on 5/3/94. The holding time criteria of 6 months (28
days for mercury) from collection to analysis for metals was
satisfied.
II.
calibration:
A.
Initial Calibration:
Acceptable
Recoveries for the initial calibration verification were
within 90-110% (80-120 % for mercury), as required.
B.
Continuing Calibration:
Acceptable
All analytes of interest in the continuing calibration
verification standard were within 90-110% recoveries (80-120 %
for mercury), as required.
III. Method Blank:
Acceptable
A method blank was analyzed with each batch of samples. No
contaminants or target analytes were detected.
IV.
Interference Check Sample (ICS) Analysis:
Acceptable
All analytes included in the ICS were recovered within 80120%, as required.
v.
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD):Not Applicable
A Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) was not
performed on a sample from this group. The laboratory did perform
a MS/MSD on a sample from another batch and recoveries were
acceptable.
vi.
overall Assessment of Data For Use:
The overall usefulness of the data is based on the criteria
outlined in "Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for
Removal Activities" (OSWER 9360.4-01 April, 1990). Based upon the
information provided, the data are acceptable for use.
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 16
Sample ID:
SI.
Project #940807
940807-01
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
PQL
Parameter
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0 .10
0.005
0.008
U
U
U
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page j of 16
Sample ID:
S2.
Project #940807
940807-02
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
Analysis
PQL
mg/L
mg/L
Method
SW846
Analysis
Date
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
6010
6010
6010
7470
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.65
U
3.6
0.10
04/20/94, Hg
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 4 of 16
Sample ID:
S3.
Project #940807
940807-03
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Analysis
Date
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0 .41
U
1.6
0.013
6010
6010
6010
7470
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 5 of 16
Sample ID:
S4.
Project #940807
940807-04
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Analysis Method
Parameter
PQL
SW846
mg/L
mg/L
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.051
U
0.11
0.024
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 6 of 16
Sample ID:
S5.
Project #940807
940807-05
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94, ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0 .10
0.005
0.63
U
1.5
0.011
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 7 of 16
Sample ID:
S6.
Project #940807
940807-06
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Analysis
Date
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
U
U
0.16
0.094
6010
6010
6010
7470
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 8 of 16
Sample ID:
S7.
Project #940807
940807-07
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0 .54
U
1.5
0.084
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 9 of 16
Sample ID:
S8,
Project #940807
940807-08
TCLP Extraction Date:
04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
PQL
Analysis Method
Parameter
SW846
mg/L
mg/L
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.19
U
0.43
0.025
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 10 of 16
Sample ID:
59.
Project #940807
940807-09
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date:
04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.27
U
0.80
0.019
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 11 of 16
Sample ID:
S10.
Project #940807
940807-10
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Analysis
Date
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.37
U
3.3
0.018
6010
6010
6010
7470
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 12 of 16
Sample ID:
Sll.
Project #940807
940807-11
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Analysis Method
PQL
Parameter
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0. 015
0.10
0.005
0.23
U
1.6
0.097
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 13 of 16
Sample ID:
S12.
Project #940807
940807-12
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Analysis
Date
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.47
U
2.0
0.019
6010
6010
6010
7470
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 14 of 16
Sample ID:
Project #940807
S13. 940807-13
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date:
04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0 .005
1.0
U
43.
0.049
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 15 of 16
Sample ID:
S14.
Project #940807
940807-14
04/20/94, Hg
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
Digestion Date: 04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Analysis Method
PQL
Parameter
SW846
mg/L
mg/L
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.11
U
0.27
0.018
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Page 16 of 16
Sample ID:
S15.
Project #940807
940807-15
TCLP Extraction Date: 04/22/94,ICP
04/20/94, Hg
Digestion Date:
04/27/94
TCLP Metals (selected)
Parameter
PQL
Analysis Method
mg/L
mg/L
SW846
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
0.005
0.015
0.10
0.005
0.19
U
0.81
0.040
6010
6010
6010
7470
Analysis
Date
04/28/94
04/28/94
04/28/94
05/03/94
- Defined Data
B
Compound detected in blank (Normalized concentration)
C
Used when blank value exceeds half of the CRDL (PQL).
Pesticide result confirmed by GC/MSD
D
Compound identified in analysis at a secondary dilution factor
E
Used when two or more dilutions of a sample are needed to acquire valid data.
Compounds concentration exceeds calibration range
Used when upper level of calibration curve is exceeded by 10%. Analyses greater than 50% of upper calibration level are
reanalyzed at a higher dilution.
J
P
U
X
Estimated value. Compound detected below the CROL (PQL).
Pesticide or Aroclor analysis where results between analytical and confirmation columns is > 25%.
Compound analyzed for but not detected at or above the CRDL (PQL).
NON- Spec/ fie flag - See definition at the end of the report
Data Validation
NJ
PND
R
RND
Presumptive evidence of presence of material at an estimated quantity.
Used when QA/QC failures are present AND data is true. Must be accompanied by NCR
Precision Not Determined
Used when non-approved methods are used to obtain data.
Reported value is unusable due to gross QA/QC deficiencies.
Recovery Not Determined
Used when non-approved methods are used to obtain data.
UJ
Compound analyzed for but not detected, reported detection limit estimated because QA/QC criteria
were not met.
Detection JLimit De-pinitions
CRDL
IDL
Contract Required Detection Limits = Detection limits specified by client or agency
Based on wet weight analysis
Instrument Detection Limit
Statistically derived detection limit from 7 +• analyses of a low level standard near but above the estimated Method Detection
Limit.
MDL
Method Detection Limit
Instrument Detection Limit X End Volume (specified by the method) / Mass. Volume or Area of the Sample [specified by the
method) (Based on wet weight analysis)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
Method Detection Limit
analysis}
X End Volume [analytical] / Mass, Volume or Area of the Sample [analytical) (Based on wet weight
ecology and environment* inc.
6777 ENGLE ROAD, CLEVELAND. OHIO 44130, TEL. (216) 243-3330
International Specialists in the Environment
M
E
M
O
R
A
N
D
U
M
DATE:
July 19, 1994
TO:
J. Nordine, TAT Project Manager, E & E, Inc., Chicago, IL
FROM:
E.S. Landis, TAT Geochemist, E & E, Inc., Cleveland, OH
VIA:
Nabil Fayoumi, TAT Chemist, E & E, Inc., Chicago, iL
SUBJ:
PCBs Data Quality Assurance Review, Kenosha Iron & Metal
Site, Kenosha, Kenosha County, WI
RE:
Analytical TDD: T059405802
Analytical PAN: EWI0423ABA
Project TDD: T059403013
Project PAN: EWI0423SAA
The data quality assurance review of 10 discrete soil samples
analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB Aroclors 1248 and 1260)
is now complete.
The samples were submitted to Heritage
Laboratories, Inc. of Romeoville, Illinois (HLI) on May 19, 1994.
The laboratory analyzed 10 of the samples for PCBs by dual-column
gas chromatography with flame ionization and electron capture
detectors (GC/FID/ECD), following SW-846 Method 8080. The samples
were labeled as follows:
TAT Station Location/Heritage Lab ID
S40/C156818
S112/C156820
S44/C156821
S51/C156822
S68/C156824
S71/C156825
S4/C156826
S90/C156827
S122/C156828
S22/C156830
•ecycicd oaper
Data Qualifications;
I.
Sample Holding Times: Acceptable.
The samples were collected at the Kenosha Iron & Metal site in
Kenosha, Wisconsin, on May 10, 1994. The samples were extracted
May 20, and analyzed May 25 and 26, 1994. The samples were
handled in compliance with the respective 14-day and 40-day
holding time limits.
II.
Instrument Performance:
Acceptable.
The PCB standard chromatogram peaks appear to be adequately
separated. Surrogate compound peaks were not identified on the
chromatogram; however, peak retention time shifts in general were
minimal.
III. Initial & Continuing Calibrations:
Qualified.
Initial calibration standards were run for Aroclors 1248 and
1260.
The percent relative standard deviations (%RSD) of the
initial calibration factors for Aroclors 1248 and 1260 both
exceeded the 10% RSD limit (RSD = 1 1 % and 18%, respectively).
Because this criterion for linearity was not met, the results are
flagged "J", as required. Daily continuing calibration check
standards were analyzed for both Aroclors. Daily continuing
calibrations check standards were analyzed for both Aroclors,
each having a percent difference (%D) from the initial
calibration of less than 15%, as required.
IV.
Analytical Error:
Precision Not Determined.
PCB matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries
were within the stated quality control limits. The MS and MSD
were prepared using sample C156830.
V.
Blanks: Acceptable.
A PCB method blank was prepared and analyzed with the samples, as
required. PCB values in both the method and calibration blanks
were below the respective detection limits.
VI.
Compound Identification:
Acceptable.
Positive identifications for PCB were verified by dual-column
analysis.
VII. Quantitation & Detection Limits:
Acceptable.
The reported values were correctly adjusted to reflect dilutions
and initial sample mass. The results are reported on dry weigh
basis.
Overall Assessment of Data:
This data evaluation is based upon guideline established in OSWER
Directive 9360-4-01 (April 1990). With the qualification
described above, the results are acceptable.
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
i
;
Receivea
HERITAGE LABORATORIES.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
INC.
Project
\
19-MAY-94
'
complete
i 26-MAY-94
(708)378-1600
Report To
Lao 10
C156818
PO Number
VERBAL
Printed
Ol-JUN-94
i
:
Sampled
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S40
NO.: 25 & 275
PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analyst* Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.1.0
Parameter
Result
Del. Limit
2.55
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
Units
Grams
mL
POLY CHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SH846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -KAY -94
Instrument: GC/ECO
Test: 0301.2.0
Prep: PCB SON 1 CAT ION EXTRACTION SU846-3550 P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
52
BDL
5.3
BDL
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
Det. Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
t
T
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
HERITAGE LABORATORIES,
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(708)378-1600
,
Project
Lab ID
19-MAY-94 i
INC.
C156820
Complete
PO Number
26 -MAY -94 i
Printed
Report To
VERBAL
i
Sampled
Ol-OUN-94 !
10-MAY-94
BUI To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: SI12
NO.: 75 & 325
PCB SONICATION EXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20 -MAY -94
Test: P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
Det.
Units
Limit
Grams
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
ml
POLYCHLORIKATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SW846-8080
Analyst: H. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Prep: PCB SONICATION EXTRACTION SW84A-3550 P231.1.0
Instrunent: GC/ECO
Result
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
110
BDL
82
BDL
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
Test: 0301.2.0
Det.
Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
m
ft
tf
vV
'
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
ma/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Received
Service Location
!
!
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(703)378-1600
i
Lab ID
19-MAY-94
Project
'
C156821
Complete
PO Number
26-MAY-94
VERBAL
Printed
!
Report To
Ol-JUN-94
Sampled
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S44
NO.: 50 & 400
PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20 -MAY -94
Test: P231.1.0
Parameter
Result
Det. Limit
Units
Grams
mi
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SW846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Instrument: GC/ECO
Test: 0301.2.0
Prep: PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SW846-3550 P231.1.0
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Result
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
35
BDL
7.8
BDL
Det. Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i
<>(
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
:
i
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
.
Deceived
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(708)378-1600
,
19-MAY-94
'
Complete
Project
: ci 56822
PO Number
26-MAY-94
;
Printed
Ol-JUN-94
Report To
lab 10
VERBAL
'
Sampled
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY 4 ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S51
NO.: 25 4 275
PCB SON I CAT I ONEXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: 5. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.T.O
Parameter
Result
Det.
Units
Limit
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
Grams
mL
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SH846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAT -94
Prep: PCB SON 1 CAT I ON EXTRACTION SW846-3550 P231.1.0
!
Instrument: GC/ECO
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Result
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
53
BDL
5.4
BDL
1
Test: 0301.2.0
Det. Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page 1 (last page)
,
!
i
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(708)376-1600
i
Project
tab 10
19 -MAY -94 i
C156824
PO Number
Complete
26-MAY-94
VERBAL
Printed
Sampled
Ol-JUN-94
Report To
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S68
NO.: 50 i 425
PCB SON I CAT I ONEXTRACTION SH846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.1.0
Parameter
Result
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS)
Units
Grams
mi
SW846-8080
Analyst: N. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Prep: PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SU&W.-3550 P 231. 1.0
Instrument: GC/ECO
Result
Parame ter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Det. Limit
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
10
BDL
15
BDL
^
(T
rv
<Y
*
Test: 0301.2.0
Oet. Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1. 0
1.0
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page 1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
!
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
'
1
HERITAGE LABORATORIES,
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
1
(/OB)3/8-lfaUU
INC.
Project
19-MAY-94
complete
27-MAY-94
VERBAL
Sampled
Ol-JUN-94
Report To
56825
PO Number
Pr,nted
i
tab ID
Cl
!
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY 4 ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S71
NO.: 25 & 325
PCB SON I CAT I ONEXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
Det.
Limit
Units
Grams
2.50
50
mL
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SW846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25-MAY-94
Prep: PCB SON I CAT ION EXTRACTION SW84A-3550 P231.1.0
Instrument: GC/ECO
Result
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
1254
1260
1262
Test: 0301.2.0
Det. Limit
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
*
*
*
*
*
mg/k
1.0
1.0
1.0
BDL
19 <V
BDL 1
mg/kgmg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
* This value is outside of the linear calibration range. The sample will
be diluted and reanalyzed.
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SH846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analyst* Date: 25-MAY-94
Prep: PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SU846-3S50 P231.1.0
Instrument: GC/ECD
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
AROCHLOR
1016
1221
1232
1242
1248
Test: 0301.2.1
Result
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
280
Det. Limit
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
T
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
1:4 DILUTION.
or a mixture of 1242/1248
Sample shows characteristics of degraded arochlor 1248 ^
Page
1 (continued on next page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
•
Received
i
|
|
19-MAY-94
complete
26-MAY-94
(/08)3/8-1600
Project
:
Report To
C156826
PO Number
VERBAL
Printed
Ol-JUN-94
Lab ID
Sampled
09-MAY-94
S i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S4
NO.: 0 & 75
PCB SON I CAT I ONEXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
Det. Limit
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
Units
Grams
mL
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SH846-8080
Analyst: H. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Instrument: GC/ECO
Test: 0301.2.0
Prep: PCB SONICAT10N EXTRACTION SU846-3550 P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Det. Limit
BDL
BDL
BDL
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
BDL ~,
35
HI
BDL 9
1.6 V
BDL ft
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
r
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
Project
Lab ID
19-MAY-94
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(708)378-1600
C156827
Complete
PO Nunber
26-MAY-94 !
VERBAL
Printed
Sampled
i Ol-JUN-94
Report To
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
INC.
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S90
NO.: 25 & 300
PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAT-94
Test; P231.1.0
Parameter
Del.
Result
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
Limit
Units
Grams
2.50
50
mL
POLYCHLORINATEO BIPHENYLS (PCBS) SW846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAT -W
Instrument: GC/ECO
Test: 0301.2.0
Prep: PCB SON I CAT ION EXTRACTION SUMo-3550 P231.1.0
Parameter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
36
BDL
1. 0
1. 0
1. 0
1. 0
^
Qj
1. 0
U
1. 0
46 (v
BDL
1. 0
1. 0
U
Sample Comnents
BDL
Oet. Limit
Result
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
Below Detection Limit
L
M
P*^ -J\'
' "
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
^''
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(705)375- 1600
Lab ID
Project
19-MAY-94
C 156828
Complete
PO Number
26-MAY-94
VERBAL
Printed
i
Sampled
Ol-JUN-94
Report To
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
INC.
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S122
NO.: 75 & 250
PCB SON I CAT I ONEXTRACTION SW846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20 -MAY -94
Test: P231.1.0
Parameter
Result
Units
Grams
mL
SW846-8080
Analyst: H. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Prep: PCB SON I CAT ION EXTRACTION SU846-3550 P231.1.0
Instrument: GC/ECD
Result
Parana ter
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Limit
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS)
Det.
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
Test: 0301.2.0
Det.
Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL.
27 U
BDL
14 Of
BDL *
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mq/kq
Sample Comments
BDL
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Page
1 (last page)
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
HERITAGE LABORATORIES, INC.
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
(708)378-1600
--
--
Project
Complete
PO Number
Ol-JUN-94
Report To
10
C156830
VERBAL
Printed
_
Lab
i
26-MAY-94
- --
•,
19-MAY-94
Sampled
10-MAY-94
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EW104235AA
LOCATION: S22
NO.: 25 & 400
PCB SON I CAT I ON EXTRACTION SH846-3550
Analyst: S. BUSSEY
Analysis Date: 20-MAY-94
Test: P231.1.0
Result
Parameter
2.50
50
INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME
FINAL VOLUME
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Instrument: GC/ECO
Parameter
Test: 0301.2.0
Result
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
Oet. Limit
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kc
1.0 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg
1.0 mg/kg
1.0 mq/kq
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
21
fr
BDL *
13 O/
BDL \
'
Sample Comments
BDL
Units
Grams
ml
(PCBS) SW846-8080
Analyst: M. JAEGER
Analysis Date: 25-MAY-94
Prep: PCB SOMICATIOM EXTRACTION SU846-3550 P231.1.0
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
PCB
Det. Limit
Below Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
Quality Assurance Officer:
Q
Page 1 (last page)
vicin i «L rni_M CO I IWIM MUCIMOT
Office of Enforcement
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Blinois 60604
Activity Code:
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJ NO.
PROJECT NAME
NO.
SAMPLERS: (Print Name and Sign)
OF
CONTAINERS
m
DATE
STA. NO.
TIME
STATION LOCATION
O
TAG NUMBERS
ItW
5<T/
1MJS
?i WO
t10
J/22
XIC
0-1-300
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date / Time
Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date / Time
Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date / Time
Received lor Laboratory by:
(Signature)
<>
Date / Time
ATTN.
Airbill Number
Chain of Custody Seal Numbers
Distribution White Accompanies Shipment; Pink - Coordinator Field Fites: i/YeKow - Laboratory File
prf pn Rmr vrlocl P.irifr Printprl with Sof
ecology and environment, inc.
6777 ENGLE ROAD, CLEVELAND, OHIO 44130. TEL. (216) 243-3330
International Specialists in the Environment
M
M
O
R
A
N
D
U
M
DATE:
August 3, 1994
TO:
J. Nordine, TAT Project Manager, E & E, Inc., Chicago, IL
FROM:
E.S. Landis, TAT Geochemist, E & E, Inc., Cleveland, OH
VIA:
Nabil Fayoumi, TAT Chemist, E & E, Inc., Chicago, iL
SUBJ:
Pesticides Data Quality Assurance Review, Kenosha Iron &
Metal Site, Kenosha, Kenosha County, WI
RE:
Analytical TDD: T059405802
Analytical PAN: EWI0423ABA
Project TDD: T059403013
Project PAN: EWI0423SAA
The data quality assurance review of one discrete soil sample
analyzed for organochlorine
pesticides
(chlordane),
is now
complete. The sample was submitted to Heritage Laboratories, Inc.
of Romeoville, Illinois (HLI) on May 19, 1994, to be analyzed for
organochlorine pesticides by the SW-846 8080 Method. IN turn, HLI
subcontracted the work to Environmental Monitoring Technologies,
Inc. of Morton Grove, Illinois (EMT). EMT followed EPA Method 608,
employing a gas chromatograph with electron capture and flame
ionization detectors (GC/ECD/FID). The sample was labeled S48,
corresponding to HLI's number, C156831.
Data Qualifications:
I.
Sample Holding Times: Acceptable.
The sample was collected at the Kenosha Iron & Metal site in
Kenosha, Wisconsin, on May 10, 1994. The HLI report noted that the
sample was received in an improper container.
The sample was
extracted May 20, and analyzed May 23, 1994. The sample was
handled in compliance with the respective 14-day and 40-day holding
time limits for extraction and analysis.
II.
Instrument Performance:
Acceptable.
The DDT peak retention time was greater than 12 minutes, as
recommended.
Pesticide standard peaks appear to have been
adequately resolved and were within the stated retention time
recycled o*D*f
windows. Internal standard reference peaks varied by less than the
1.5% limit between the standard and sample . [Evaluation Standard
Mixes A or B were not identified; therefore, the reviewer is unable
to calculate the DDT and Endrin percent breakdown.]
III. Initial & Continuing Calibrations:
Acceptable.
Percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) values of calibration
factors for aldrin, endrin, DEC, and DDT were not reported in EMT's
pesticide data packet. The correlation coefficients of eight peaks
for five standard concentrations of chlordane were greater than or
equal to 0.995 for the initial calibration, indicating that the
calibration for chlordane was linear.
A daily (continuing)
calibration standard run with the sample. Chlordane peak retention
time shifts between the standards and the sample were less than
15%, as required for the quantitation column.
IV.
Analytical Error:
Precision Not Determined.
Surrogate compounds were diluted beyond the lower detection limit.
V.
Blank: Acceptable.
No pesticide compounds were detected in the blank.
VI.
Compound Identification:
Acceptable.
Identification of chlordane was based on a multi-peak pattern
matching the initial calibration. A dual-column GC was used to
verify the compound identification.
VII. Quantitation & Detection Limits:
Acceptable.
Sample values were adjusted to reflect the extraction volume,
sample mass, and dilutions required to conduct the analysis. The
results are reported on a dry-weight basis.
Overall Assessment of Data:
This data evaluation is based upon guidelines established in OSWER
Directive 9360.4-01 (April 1990) and SW-846 "Test Methods for the
Evaluation of Solid Waste", (1986, 3rd ed.). Given the information
provided, the results may be considered acceptable for use as
reported.
C E R T I F I C A T E
O F
A N A L Y S I S
Service Location
Received
HERITAGE LABORATORIES,
1319 MARQUETTE DRIVE
ROMEOVILLE, IL 60441
INC.
19-MAY-94
complete
| 06-JUN-94
(708)3/8-1600
Printed
Project
Lab ID
C 156831
PO Nuifcer
VERBAL
Sampled
07-JUN-94
Report To
B i l l To
MARY JANE RIPP
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT,
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Ill WEST JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 60604
INC.
Sample Description
PROJECT
PROJECT
STATION
STATION
NAME: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT - T05-9405-802
NO.: EWI04235AA
LOCATION: S48
NO.: 0 4 300
ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC:ECD (7 PESTICIDES) SH846-8080
Analysis Date: 25 -MAY -94
Vendor: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING t TECHNOLOGIES
Parameter
Result
< 600
< 1200
< 400
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDRIN
METHOXYCHLOR
CHLORDANE
TOXAPHENE
< 2000
< 2000
35000
< 10000
Test: 0164.3.0
Det. Limit
600
1200
400
2000
2000
5200
10000
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
uq/kq
Sample Comments
Less Than Lower Detection Limit
Sample was received in improper container.
Sample chain of custody number 5-34715.
This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of the lab.
As indicated, some testing was performed at the following locations:
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & TECHNOLOGIES
8100 NORTH AUSTIN AVENUE, MORTON GROVE, IL 60053-3203
Quality Assurance Officer:
( &*>.<>)
Page 1 (last page)
;
APPENDIX C
TAT XRF 920 FIELD DATA
20
TAT XRF 920 SOIL SAMPLE DATA
KENOSHA IRON & METAL, KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
HAY 1994
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
0+0
ASSAY
STANDARD
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,296
31.64
20225
0.039
0+0
1-1.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,709
40.81
2.430
0.018
0+25
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.002
1,597
38.20
2.391
0.022
0+25
1-1.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,231
29.87
2.159
0.048
0+50
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
1,376
33.36
2.281
0.018
0+50
0-1.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,054
24.83
1.835
0.085
0+75
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,190
28.63
2.096
0.055
0+75
1-1.5
0.0
0.008
0.011
0.003
1,282
29.93
2.049
0.046
0+100
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
1,205
28.35
2.107
0.0352
0+100
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.002
1,340
31.02
2.207
0.046
0+125
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,209
29.07
2.118
0.049
0+125
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,024
23.28
1.530
0.115
0+150
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.105
0.003
882.2
20.86
1.818
0.017
0+150
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
839.5
19.10
1.719
0.076
0+175
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
862.8
19.88
1.607
0.098
0+175
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.001
0.003
1,130
27.02
2.034
0.032
0+200
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
727.5
15.74
1.299
0.120
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
0-1-200
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.014
0.003
857.6
19.34
1.590
0.088
0+225
0-1
0.0
0.005
0.140
0.002
542.5
5.899
0.0
0.205
0+225
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
406.3
0.979
0.0
0.254
0+250
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.087
0.003
450.3
1.180
0.0
0.325
0+250
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
753.0
17.52
1.615
0.090
0+275
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.031
0.003
586.0
9.223
0.537
0.165
0+275
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
626.5
10.15
0.579
0.140
25+0
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
485.5
7.264
0.150
0.166
25+0
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
454.7
5.302
0.0
0.193
0+200
0-1
0.009
0.008
0.162
0.001
626.5
7.968
0.579
0.140
0+200
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.002
500.3
6.802
0.182
0.197
TAT XRF 920 SOIL SAMPLE DATA
KENOSHA IRON fc METAL, KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
MAY 1994 (Cont.)
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
-25+100
DEPTH
IN
FEET
1-.5
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,252
50.27
2.601
0.017
Black
-22+0
0-.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,723
41.41
2.302
0.016
BROWN
-25+175
0-.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,545
39.28
2.361
0.032
TAN
-25+150
0-.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,479
59.82
2.559
0.035
BROWN
0-.5
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1.949
46.33
2,497 .
0.016
BROWN
+25+150
0-1
0.014
0.009
0.609
0.008
2,538
72.79
0.889
0.164
BLACK
+25+150
0-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
3,035
69.06
2.422
0.078
BLACK
25+25
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
xxxxx
0.0
0.369
BROWN
& TAN
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
XXXXX
0.0
0.312
BROWN
208.4
-25+200
25+25
0-1
262.5
25+50
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
7,720
156.2
0.890
0.249
BROWN
25+50
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
6,244
128.3
1.559
0.202
TAN
25+75
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.08
0.004
5,561
119.9
1.792
0.158
BROWN
25+75
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
4,846
103.3
1.761
0.180
BROWN
25+100
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.289
0.003
5,664
124.7
0.905
0.209
BLACK
25+100
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
4,387
95.05
2.258
0.128
BLACK
25+125
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.280
0.005
3.435
88.80
1.268
0.162
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
25+125
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
3.537
82.12
1.773
0.160
BLACK
25+175
0-1
0.039
0.009
0.571
0.007
2,375
65.93
1.044
0.143
BLACK
25+125
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.136
0.003
3.877
86.02
1,638
0.159
BLACK
25+200
0-1
0.051
0.009
0.592
0.009
2,157
65.36
0.766
0.173
BLACK
25+200
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.207
0.003
2,736
65.32
1.765
0.107
BLACK
25+225
0-1
0.126
0.010
0.718
0.017
0.0
0.332
BLACK
385.9
25+225
1-2
0.025
0.009
0.420
0.011
8,756
258.2
0.0
0.273
BLACK
25+325
0-1
0.084
0.010
0.941
0.014
2,562
81.02
0.0
0.290
BLACK
25+325
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.004
2,754
70.94
2.170
0.087
BLACK
25+250
0-1
0.044
0.009
0.335
0.007
1,734
53.11
1.426
0.117
BLACK
25+250
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
5,448
115.8
1.631
0.187
BLACK
25+275
0-1
0.0
0.009
0.551
0.010
2,481
80.81
0.0
0.250
BLACK
25+275
1-2
0.0
0.009
0.683
0.011
4,248
131.0
0.096
0.237
BLACK
25+300
0-1
0.053
0.009
0.334
0.008
1,753
55.98
1.364
0.124
BLACK
25+300
11.5
0.146
0.010
0.432
0.010
1,460
48.11
0.234
0.214
BLACK
25+325
0-1
0.084
0.010
0.941
0.014
2,562
81.02
0.0
0.290
BLACK
25+325
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.004
2,754
70.94
2.170
0.087
BLACK
25+350
0-1
0.033
0.009
0.586
0.013
7,596
232.7
0.0
0.290
BLACK
25+350
1-2
0.027
0.009
0.626
0.014
9,000
276.1
0.0
0.248
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
25+375
0-1
0.149
0.010
0.669
0.012
1,713
54.57
0.191
0.212
BLACK
25+375
1-2
0.107
0.009
0.523
0.009
2,085
64.66
1.241
0.124
BLACK
25+400
0-1
0.0
0.009
0.570
0.010
5,323
157.0
0.152
0.239
BLACK
25+400
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.485
0.011
0.0
0.290
BLACK
395.7
25+425
0-1
0.013
0.008
0.199
0.005
1,089
29.95
1.738
0.066
BLACK
25+425
1-2
0.063
0.009
0.663
0.013
2,448
84.61
0.124
0.226
BLACK
25+450
0-1
0.086
0.010
0.061
0.009
1,881
76.86
0.0
0.263
BLACK
25+450
1-2
0.008
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,460
61.82
2.335
0.069
BLACK
50+0
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,858
44.31
2,486
0.023
TAN
50+0
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,973
47.22
2.479
0.034
TAN
50+25
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,496
57.74
2.491
0.058
BROWN
50+25
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,122
49.65
2.544
0.019
BLACK
50+50
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,283
53.22
2,453
0.062
BROWN
50+50
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
2,182
50.92
2.573
0.027
TAN
50+75
0-1
0.02
0.009
0.503
0.007
1,125
25.53
1.081
0.127
BLACK
50+75
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,956
46.98
2.510
0.022
TAN
50+100
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,193
53.79
2.493
0.026
BLACK
50+100
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,027
48.37
2.464
0.041
BLACK
50=125
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.074
0.004
2,051
52.29
2.153
0.054
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
50+125
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,348
56.25
2.494
0.033
BLACK
50+150
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,723
63.33
2.264
0.086
BLACK
50+150
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,717
66.95
2.330
0.073
BLACK
50+175
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.231
0.003
2,980
72.29
1.649
0.125
BLACK
50+175
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.082
0.004
3,082
72.95
2.157
0.088
BLACK
50+200
0-1
0.010
0.008
0.365
0.006
3,307
90.18
1.434
0.134
BLACK
50+200
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.063
0.003
2,916
54.81
2.640
0.056
BLACK
50+225
0-1
0.036
0.009
0.328
0.007
2,264
67.44
1.213
0.148
BLACK
50+225
1-2
0.016
0.008
0.214
0.006
978.9
26.19
1.647
0.077
BLACK
50+250
0-1
0.067
0.009
0.548
0.010
2,353
76.05
0.745
0.178
BLACK
-50+250
-1-2
0.044
0.009
0.335
0.007
1,734
53.11
1.426
0.117
BLACK
50+275
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.422
0.008
2,659
82.50
0.796
0.188
BLACK
50+275
1-2
0.004
0.008
0.085
0.003
786.2
17.03
1.696
0.031
BLACK
50+300
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.466
0.009
3,001
95.34
0.974
0.171
BLACK
50+300
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.175
0.005
2,524
70.08
1.671
0.119
BLACK
50+325
0-1
0.0
0.009
0.660
0.010
2,929
90.19
0.0
0.315
TAN
50+325
1-2
0.052
0.009
0.244
0.003
845.7
16.68
1.548
0.016
BLACK
50+350
0-1
0.057
0.010
0.596
0.009
1,576
45.49
0.493
0.193
BLACK
50+350
1-2
0.040
0.009
0.566
0.009
2,040
61.12
0.694
0.181
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
50+375
0-1
0.026
0.009
0.582
0.010
2,103
66.14
0.151
0.229
BLACK
-50+375
-1-2
0.107
0.009
0.523
0.009
2,085
64.66
1.241
0.124
BLACK
50+400
0-1
0.050
0.009
0.534
0.009
2,127
66.01
0.537
0.198
BLACK
50+400
1-2
0.036
0.009
0.586
0.010
2,628
82.63
0.017
0.192
BROWN
50+425
0-1
0.024
0.009
0.505
0.009
3,301
100.1
0.854
0.179
BLACK
50+425
1-2
0.062
0.009
0.446
0.007
3,000
84.92
0.969
0.167
BLACK
50+450
0-1
0.050
0.009
0.469
0.010
2,555
85.72
0.482
0.206
BLACK
75+0
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.055
0.003
2,215
53.50
2.146
0.075
BLACK
75+25
0-1
0.021
0.008
0.486
0.006
1,973
54.32
1.545
0.083
BROWN
75+25
1-2
0.024
0.008
0.479
0.006
1,990
52.34
1.424
0.090
BLACK
75+50
0-1
0.004
0.008
0.360
0.004
1,862
47.16
1.449
0.094
BLACK
75+50
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,573
37.53
2.376
0.024
TAN
75+75
0-1
0.023
0.009
0.426
0.005
1,105
23.76
0.839
0.151
BROWN
75+75
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
997.2
24.13
1.852
0.079
TAN
75+100
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.194
0.004
1,883
49.39
1.627
0.112
BLACK
75+100
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
4,260
90.99
2.435
0.114
TAN
75+125
0-1
0.034
0.008
0.386
0.005
2,035
55.69
1.528
0.096
BLACK
75+125
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.156
0.004
2,346
61.42
1.856
0.096
BLACK
75+150
0-1
0.015
0.009
0.632
0.013
0.0
0.355
BLACK
501.0
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
75+150
1-2
0.0
0.009
0.386
0.009
0.0
0.364
BLACK
460.8
75+175
0-1
0.086
0.009
0.694
0.010
3,163
92.95
0.638
0.182
BLACK
75+175
1-2
0.055
0.009
0.418
0.005
1,789
47.87
1.423
0.095
BLACK
75+200
0-1
0.081
0.010
0.458
0.006
957.4
16.42
0.626
0.164
BROWN
75+200
1-2
0.0
0.009
0.496
0.009
0.0
0.352
BLACK
294.8
75+225
0-1
0.178
0.011
0.460
0.008
1,441
41.47
0.564
0.181
BLACK
75+225
1-2
0.122
0.010
0.574
0.008
1,856
51.17
0.273
0.207
BLACK
75+250
0-1
0.319
0.013
0.503
0.009
1,005
22.43
0.0
0.284
BLACK
75+250
1-2
0.156
0.011
0.635
0.011
3,333
104.6
0.0
0.299
BLACK
75+275
0-1
0.100
0.011
0.383
0.007
789.5
11.26
0.0
0.285
BLACK
75+275
1-2
0.061
0.009
0.617
0.011
4,008
124.6
0.175
0.228
BLACK
75+300
0-1
0.0
0.009
0.728
0.015
0.0
0.435
BLACK
311.7
0.0
0.009
0.039
0.004
0.0
0.422
BLACK
249.2
75+300
1-2
75+325
0-1
0.057
0.010
0.765
0.011
2,654
82.08
0.0
0.247
BLACK
75+325
1-2
0.010
0.009
0.559
0.010
2.755
85.64
0.037
0.243
BLACK
75+350
0-1
0.009
0.008
0.738
0.013
6,807
203.8
0.252
0.225
BLACK
75+350
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.072
0.005
7,023
159.7
0.067
0.281
BLACK
75+375
0-1
0.063
0.010
0.784
0.014
5,364
174.8
0.0
0.287
BROWN
75+375
1-2
0.049
0.009
0.546
0.011
4,234
132.9
0.012
0.243
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DBS CRIP
75+400
0-1
0.079
0.010
0.786
0.014
2,712
91.80
0.123
0.223
BLACK
75+400
1-2
0.097
0.010
0.867
0.019
7,843
278.9
0.0
0.299
BROWN
754-425
0-1
0.039
0.009
0.560
0.011
1,719
56.17
0.373
0.209
BLACK
75+425
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
815.9
18.10
1.480
0.114
TAN
75+450
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.112
0.008
7,278
205.2
0.617
0.216
BLACK
75+450
1-2
0.016
0.009
0.347
0.007
1,202
33.78
1.304
0.122
BLACK
100+0
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,597
38.90
2.317
0.025
TAN
100+0
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.030
0.003
1,929
48.59
2.249
0.039
BLACK
100+25
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,532
37.40
2.306
0.029
TAN
100+25
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,189
28.95
2.066
0.061
TAN
100+50
0-1
0.01
0.008
0.301
0.004
1,642
44.15
1.742
0.063
BROWN
100+50
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.002
1,612
39.50
2.376
0.030
TAN
100+75
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.275
0.005
2,026
56.56
1,638
0.102
BLACK
100+75
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
2,368
55.96
2.615
0.024
TAN
100+100
0-1
0.007
0.008
0.283
0.005
2,213
61.32
1.722
0.093
BLACK
100+100
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
2,251
54.05
2.514
0.048
TAN
100+125
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.004
1,808
47.06
2.201
0.053
BLACK
100+125
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
23.06
60.03
2.284
0.067
BLACK
100+150
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.189
0.004
2,586
66.27
2.140
0.050
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
100+150
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,206
52.85
2.332
0.053
BLACK
100+175
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.558
0.008
2,153
61.56
1.079
0.146
BLACK
100+175
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.195
0.001
1,905
44.32
1.750
0.076
BLACK
100+200
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.391
0.008
1,933
59.23
1.343
0.130
BLACK
100+200
1-2
0.0
0.010
0.400
0.008
2.092
64.35
0.0
0.418
BLACK
109.7+225
0-1
0.101
0.009
0.499
0.010
1,885
61.37
1.381
0.111
BLACK
109.7+225
1-2
0.043
0.009
0.173
0.006
1,361
40.89
1.206
0.148
BLACK
100+275
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,507
38.01
2.345
0.016
BLACK
100+375
1-2
0.005
0.007
0.0
0.004
2,065
55.01
2.344
0.040
BLACK
100+400
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,340
56.11
2.521
0.033
BLACK
100+400
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,245
55.12
2.369
0.058
BLACK
100+425
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,111
52.57
2.518
0.024
BLACK
100+425
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
27.24
64.46
2.432
0.063
BLACK
100+450
0-1
0.006
0.008
0.0
0.004
2,202
60.02
2.187
0.062
BLACK
100+450
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.108
0.004
2,402
60.07
2.136
0.065
BLACK
111.5+250
0-1
0.007
0.008
0.028
0.003
3,448
74.77
2.212
0.107
BLACK
111.5+250
1-2
0.009
0.007
0.0
0.003
3,182
76.67
2.643
0.040
BLACK
113.4+300
0-1
0.005
0.007
0.0
0.004
2,525
66.42
2.309
0.066
113.4+300
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,346
38.18
2.250
0.024
BLACK
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
113+275
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,202
56.06
2.344
0.061
BLACK
113+275
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
3,257
69.90
2.608
0.069
BLACK
116+325
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,601
66.86
2.407
0.068
BLACK
114.8+225
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
2,365
56.89
2.627
0.018
BLACK
116+350
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,474
65.13
2.377
0.065
BLACK
125+0
0-1
0.006
0.008
0.159
0.004
1,851
47.88
2.014
0.047
BLACK
125+100
0-1
0.006
0.009
0.362
0.004
3,059
77.70
1.257
0.145
BLACK
125+100
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.004
3,254
78.88
2.142
0.102
BLACK
125+125
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.242
0.003
3.029
74.94
1.852
0.097
BLACK
125+125
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.061
0.003
2,468
55.17
2.355
0.048
BLACK
125+150
0-1
0.033
0.008
0.652
0.011
2,471
77.95
1.211
0.133
BLACK
125+150
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.037
0.004
1,780
46.82
2.161
0.047
BLACK
125+175
0-1
0.010
0.009
0.635
0.009
1,944
36.38
0.537
0.193
BROWN
125+175
1-2
0.0
0.009
0.272
0.005
1,883
53.22
1.224
0.150
BLACK
125+200
0-1
0.003
0.007
0.009
0.004
2,283
61.40
2.204
0.061
BLACK
125+200
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,275
56.43
2.385
0.044
BLACK
125+225
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.004
3,262
81.43
2.167
0.100
BLACK
125+225
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
3,740
94.56
1.970
0.131
BLACK
125+250
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,856
74.37
2.161
0.100
BLACK
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
125+250
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,349
60.02
2.365
0.063
BLACK
125+275
0-1
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,065
35.58
2.315
0.059
BLACK
125+275
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,194
57.85
2.278
0.070
BLACK
125+300
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,812
44.52
2.439
0.017
BLACK
125+300
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,147
56.60
2.364
0.050
BLACK
125+325
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,522
37.52
2,306
0.031
TAN
125+325
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,706
41.77
2.417
0.025
BLACK
125+350
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
3,187
75.77
2.568
0.068
BLACK
125+350
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2.088
56.50
2.296
0.062
BLACK
125+375
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
3,369
84.16
2.388
0.079
BLACK
125+375
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
2,885
80.01
2.173
0.094
BLACK
125+400
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.021
0.003
2,529
61.20
2.422
0.032
BLACK
125+400
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.023
0.004
2,857
69.24
2.289
0.074
BLACK
125+425
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.004
2,520
62.46
2.438
0.037
BLACK
125+425
1-2
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.003
2,299
56.90
2.323
0.052
BLACK
125+450
0-1
0.007
0.008
0.245
0.007
2,434
56.65
1.545
0.022
BLACK
125+450
1-2
0.053
0.010
0.0
0.156
6,202
91.03
0.0
0.71
BROWN
0+450
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.045
0.003
1,581
37.95
2.187
0.022
BLACK
0+450
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.003
1,426
34.11
2.213
0.043
BLACK
[
SAMPLE
COORDINATE
DEPTH
IN
FEET
CHROMIUM
IN %
LEAD
IN %
BARIUM
IN PPM
MERCURY
IN PPM
SAMPLE
DESCRIP
150+0
0-1
0.0
0.007
0.043
0.003
1,100
26.61
1.942
0.040
BLACK
150+0
1-2
0.0
0.007
0.0
0.002
1,407
34.55
2.293
0.034
TAN
APPENDIX D
SOIL SAMPLE PCB DATA FROM TAT FASP LABORATORY
22
SOIL SAMPLE PCS DATA FROM TAT FASP LABORATORY
KENOSHA IRON t METAL, KENOSEA, WISCONSIN
MAY 1994
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
SI
50+0
0-1
ND
ND
S2
50+0
1-2
ND
ND
S3
75+0
0-1
1254/1260
1
S4
0+75
1-1.5
1248
31
S5
25+0
1-2
1260
(T)
56
0+25
0-1
ND
ND
S7
0-10
1-1.5
ND
ND
S8
0+50
1-1.5
ND
ND
S9
0+50
0-1
ND
ND
S10
0+0
0-1
ND
ND
Sll
75+0
1-2
ND
ND
S12
0+75
0-1
1248
(T)
S13
100+0
1-2
1254
(T)
S14
100+0
0-1
1254/1260
(T)
S15
125+0
1-2
1254
(T)
S16
25+0
0-1
ND
ND
S17
150+0
0-1
ND
ND
S18
0+25
1-1.5
ND
ND
S19
125+0
0-1
1254/1260
3
S20
150+0
1-2
ND
ND
S21
25+375
0-1
1254/1260
7
S22
25+400
0-1
1254/1260
18
S23
0+250
1-2
ND
ND
S24
0+225
0-1
ND
ND
S25
0+275
0-1
ND
ND
S26
25+225
1-2
ND
8
CONCENTRATION
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
S27
0+100
0-1
1248
3
S28
0+100
1-2
ND
ND
S29
0+125
0-1
ND
ND
S30
0+125
1-2
ND
ND
S31
5+450
0-1
1254
12
S32
0+150
0-1
1254/1260
T
S33
25+200
1-2
ND
ND
S34
0+150
1-2
ND
ND
S35
25+125
0-1
1254
11
S36
0+275
0-1
1254/1260
(T)
S37
25+350
0-1
1254/1260
12
S38
25+200
0-1
1254/1260
(5-10)
S39
50+275
0-1
1248
16
S40
25-275
0-1
1248
25
S41
25+425
1-2
1254/1260
18
S42
0+250
0-1
ND
ND
S43
25+425
0-1
1254/1260
7
S44
50+400
0-1
1248/1260
16
S45
50+350
1-2
1254/1260
12
S46
50+375
0-1
1254/1260
21
S47
0-450
1-2
ND
ND
S48
0+300
0-1
ND
CONTAINS
CHLOROANE
S49
0+300
1-2
ND
ND
S50
50+350
0-1
1248/54/60
18
S51
25+275
1-2
1248
48
S52
50+300
0-1
1248
52
S53
25+225
0-1
1254/1260
10
S54
25-100
1-2
ND
ND
S55
25-100
' 0-1
1254/1260
7
CONCENTRATION
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
S56
25+125
1-2
ND
ND
S57
0+175
0-1
ND
ND
S58
25+75
0-1
ND
ND
S59
25+75
1-2
ND
ND
S60
50+225
0-1
ND
ND
S61
0+225
1-2
ND
ND
S62
0+450
0-1
ND
ND
S63
0-200
0-1
ND
ND
S64
0+200
1-2
ND
ND
S65
0+175
1-2
ND
ND
S66
25+150
1-2
ND
ND
S67
25+150
0-1
ND
ND
S68
50-425
0-1
1248/1260
28
S69
25+400
1-2
1248/1260
30
S70
50+250
0-1
1254/1260
11
S71
25+325
0-1
1248
72
S72
25+375
1-2
1254/1260
18
S73
25+450
0-1
ND
ND
S74
25+300
0-1
1254/1260
40
S75
25-175
1-2
1254/1260
(T)
S76
50+325
0-1
1248/54/60
34
S77
50+300
1-2
1248
100+
S78
25+250
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S79
50-425
1-2
1254
15
S80
50-450
1-2
1248/1260
(5-10)
S81
25-50
1-2
ND
ND
S82
25+25
1-2
ND
ND
S83
25+350
.5-1
1248/54/60
36
S84
25+250
1-2
ND
ND
CONCENTRATION
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
CONCENTRATION
S85
25+325
1-2
1248
37
S86
25+25
0-1
ND
ND
S87
25+175
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S88
25+450
1-2
ND
ND
S89
50-400
1-2
1248/1260
26
S90
25-300
.5-1
1248/54/60
54
S91
25-50
0-1
ND
ND
S92
125+450
0-1
ND
ND
S93
125+400
0-1
ND
ND
S94
125+400
1-2
ND
ND
S95
125+425
0-1
ND
ND
S96
125+425
1-2
ND
ND
S97
125+450
1-2
ND
ND
S98
100+450
1-2
ND
ND
S99
100+450
0-1
ND
ND
S100
75+400
0-1
1248/54/60
28
S101
75+400
1-2
1248/54/60
26
S102
75+450
1-2
1254
19
S103
75+425
1-2
1254/1260
18
S104
75+450
0-1
1248/54/60
8
S105
100+400
1-2
ND
ND
S106
100+425
1-2
ND
ND
S107
100+425
0-1
ND
ND
S108
100+400
0-1
ND
ND
S109
75+425
0-1
1254/1260
12
S110
75-100
0-1
1248/54/60
16
Sill
-25+200
0-.5
ND
ND
S112
75+325
1-2
1248/54/60
124
S113
75+200
1-2
1248/54/60
18
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
S114
116+350
0-1
ND
ND
S115
100+125
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S116
-25+75
S117
75+125
1-2
1248/54/60
16
3118
-25+100
0-.5
ND
ND
S119
100+150
1-2
ND
ND
S120
75+250
0-1
1248/54/60
28
S121
100+375
1-2
ND
ND
S122
75+250
1-2
1248/54/60
34
S123
75+75
0-1
1254/1260
18
S124
75+25
1-2
ND
ND
S125
100+150
0-1
1248
26
S126
75+300
1-2
1248
49
S127
108+375
1-2
1254/1260
6
S128
75+300
0-1
1248/1260
92
S129
75-75
1-2
1254/1260
14
S130
75+50
1-2
ND
ND
S131
75-25
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S132
75-200
0-1
1248/54/60
38
S133
113.4+300
0-1
ND
ND
S134
114.8+325
1-2
ND
ND
S135
100+125
1-2
ND
ND
S136
100+100
1-2
ND
ND
S137
113+275
1-2
ND
ND
S138
75+325
0-1
1248/54/60
70
S139
75+275
0-1
1248/54/60
41
S140
75+350
0-1
1248/54/60
28
S141
100+375
0-1
ND
ND
S142
109.6+200
0-1
1248/54/60
32
CONCENTRATION
(IN PPM)
NO
CONCENTRATION
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FT)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FT)
PCB
S170
116+325
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S171
125+350
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S172
125+175
0-1
1254/1260
(T)
5/11/94
S173
50+50
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S174
125+200
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S175
100+25
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S176
75+225
1-2
1248/54/60
37
5/10/94
S177
175+275
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S178
75+375
0-1
1248/54/60
38
5/10/94
S179
100+100
0-1
1248/54/60
8
5/11/94
S180
75+350
1-2
1248
34
5/10/94
S181
125+100
0-1
1254/1260
23
5/11/94
S182
125+200
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S183
125+325
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S184
125+225
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S185
50+125
0-1
1248/54/60
14
5/10/94
S186
50+200
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S187
125+225
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S188
50+100
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S189
125+375
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S190
50+150
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S191
125+325
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S192
50+75
0-1
1254/1260
26
5/10/94
S193
125+325
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S194
125+150
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S195
125+275
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S196
125+100
1-2
1254/1260
5
5/11/94
S197
125+150
0-1
1248/54/60
16
5/11/94
DATE
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FEET)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FEET)
PCB
S143
111.5+250
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S144
109.74-225
1-2
1254/1260
13
S145
109.7+225
0-1
1254/1260
11
S146
75+50
0-1
1254/1260
(5-10)
S147
-22+50
0-.5
ND
ND
S148
75+275
1-2
1254/1260
29
S149
75-175
0-1
1248/54/60
18
S150
75+375
1-2
1248/54/60
15
S151
109.6+200
1-2
1254/1260
25
S152
100+50
1-2
ND
ND
S153
75+225
0-1
1248/54/60
26
S154
75+150
0-1
1248/54/60
8
S155
100+75
0-1
1254/1260
15
S156
75+175
1-2
1248/54/60
25
S157
100+50
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
S158
100+25
1-2
ND
ND
S159
108+175
0-1
1248/54/60
24
S160
100+75
1-2
ND
ND
S161
75+125
0-1
1254/1260
7
S162
-25+175
0-.5
0
ND
S163
113.4+300
1-2
0
ND
S164
75+150
1-2
1254/1260
4
S165
-25+150
0-.5
LOW
CHLOROANE
ND
S166
114.8+325
0-1
ND
ND
S167
115.5+250
1-2
ND
ND
S168
75+100
1-2
ND
ND
5169
114.8+325
1-2
ND
ND
ND = Non Detect
Trace <
CONCENTRATION
(IN PPM)
LAB
SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE
COORDINATES
(IN FT)
SAMPLE
DEPTH
(IN FT)
PCB
S198
50+175
0-1
1248/54/60
18
5/10/94
S199
50+200
0-1
1248
12
5/10/94
S200
50+25
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S201
50+50
0-1
ND
ND
5/10/94
S202
50+25
0-1
ND
ND
5/10/94
S203
125+125
0-1
1248/54/60
(5-10)
5/11/94
S204
50+150
0-1
ND
ND
5/10/94
S205
125+275
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S206
50+125
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S207
125+375
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S208
125+125
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S209
125+175
1-2
1254/1260
23
5/11/94
S210
125+300
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S211
125+250
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
S212
50+175
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S213
125-250
1-2
ND
ND
5/11/94
S214
50+75
1-2
ND
ND
5/10/94
S215
50+100
0-1
ND
ND
5/10/94
125+300
S216
Non Detect
ND
0-1
ND
ND
5/11/94
CONCENTRATION
DATE
(IN PPM)
Trace < 5 PPM
APPENDIX E
RCMS 4,0 COST ESTIMATE
24
Summery Report
Initial Co»t Projection Scenario: KIHOSHA IRON t METAL
Projection ID Number: W10423SA
Cleanup Contractor: RES5 - Riedel Envirormntal
Page: 1
Date: 06/03/94
TAT Contractor: EOXOGYIENVIRON
Cost Projection Sunmery
Contractor Personnel
Contractor Equipment
Unit Rat* Materials
At Cost Materials
Subcontractors
Waste Transportation
Wast* Disposal
211,447.20
35,717.66
73,517.26
0.00
27,629.75
33,215.33
257,759.70
Cleanup Contractor Subtotal
639,286.90
Federal and State Agencies
0.00
Extramural Subtotal
20 X Extramural Contingency
639,286.90
127.857.38
Extramural Subtotal
767,144.28
TAT Personnel
TAT Special Projects
TAT Analytical Services
74,037.60
0.00
0.00
Total TAT Costs
74,037.60
Other Cost Items
0.00
Extramural Subtotal
IS X Project Contingency
841,181.88
126,177.28
Total Extramural Cost
967,359.16
EPA Regional Personnel
25,564.00
EPA Hon-imglonal Personnel
EPA Headquarters Direct
(10 X of Regional Hours)
EPA Indirect
0.00
2,160.00
38,160.00
EPA Total
65,880.00
Project Total
1,033,239.16
Page: 2
SuMary Report (com.)
Initial Cost Projection Scenario: KINOSHA IRON t METAL
Projection ID Huaber: W10423SA
Cleanup Contrector: RESS - Riedel EnvironMntel
Date: 06/03/94
TAT Contractor: ECOLOCYtEMVIROM
Project Scope
000
Step/Milestone
EstiMted
Duration
GENERAL SITE COSTS
90 Days
Co*t
1,033,239.16
1,033,239.16
DETAILED REPORT BY CATEGORY
REDACTED
4 PAGES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE SELECTION OF THE
REMOVAL ACTION