Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Letter Re: Site Referral

Letter to Rey Rivera, regarding information at the Kenosha Iron and Metal Site, in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

254307

1994-03-17 00:00:00.0

WID988574257

Kenosha Iron and Metal

PDF

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Bill Ramsey

Administrative Record

Emergency Response & Removal

text

Letter

Kenosha Iron and Metal site

Environmental reporting

Midwest

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

City of Kenosha

1994-03-17

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

City of Kenosha

Copyright undetermined

eng

Kenosha, Wisconsin

PDF

C
State Of Wisconsin

\

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
101 South Webster Street
Box 7921
Madison, Wisconsin 53707

OEPT. OF NATUML RESOUMCU
G«org» E. M*y*r
S«crttary

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

March 17, 1994

SUPERFUND/SOLID WASTE FAX 608-267-2768
DIRECT DIAL 608-266-1618

254307

Rey Rivera
Site Assessment Section
U.S. EPA Region V HSM-5J
77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604

SITE ASSESSML.
Dear Rey:
Here is some information on the Kenosha Iron and Metal Site. It looks as though it
may require some sort of removal action. Could you please direct this to the attention
of Charlie Gebien. We spoke about it up in Stevens Point and he said that he would
be able to take a look at it
Thanks, _^
Bill Ramsey.
Waste Management Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
608-264-8962

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal Site Investigation
U.S. EPA ID# WID988574257
Address:

5512/5514 19th Ave .
Kenosha, VI 53140
SV 1/4 sec. 31
T2N, R23E

Site History:
The Kenosha Iron and Metal property has been used as a scrap
yard/recycling operation for roughly 40 years. Prior to its use as a scrap
yard the property was used as a coal storage yard. In 1948 The Chicago and
Northwestern Railway Co. conveyed the property by quit claim deed to The M & R
Land Co. In 1955 the M & R Land Co. conveyed the property by warranty deed to
Maurice Sabin, as trustee. In 1983 Maurice Sabin, as trustee, conveyed the
property by land contract to Harold R. , and Roy M. , Federman. In a letter
dated November 8, 1991, Harold Federman informed the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources (WDNR) that he had not fully executed the land contract with
Mr. Sabin and that in doing so ownership of the property had reverted back to
Mr. Sabin (ref. 1). Mr. Sabin, in response to a letter requesting permission
to sample at the Kenosha Iron and Metal site, informed WDNR that he was not
the owner of the property, but the trustee of a land trust that held title to
the property. He provided the names, last known addresses, and telephone
numbers of three individuals identified as owners (Ref. 2). Attempts to
contact these individuals yielded two non- responses and one letter was
returned to WDNR stamped "Undeliverable as addressed- Forwarding order
expired". The Preliminary Assessment performed for the site (11/13/90),
identified Mr. Harold Federman as the owner and operator. The Kenosha County
Register of Deeds lists the Federmans as the current owners. The property is
abandoned and tax delinquent. The city has identified the property as a
hazardous waste site and is no longer assessing taxes on the property.
In 1990 the City of Kenosha razed and removed two buildings onsite.
Within the scope of the razing order the city also removed deteriorating
fencing, a concrete scale, and metal debris. Currently the site is an
unfenced property of approximately 1.3 acres. The site was posted as a
potential health hazard by the city, but is used as a shortcut by area
residents and the students of two schools that are within a block of the
property.
An asb«*to« study performed in 1988 by Carnow, Conibear and Associates
found asbestos containing material throughout the yard area and one soil
sample was found to contain asbestos as well (Ref. 3). This asbestos
containing material was removed with the debris in 1990 but there is no
indication that special precautions were used during the asbestos removal. A
cursory asbestos survey conducted as part of the September 28, 1993 Site
Investigation (SI) yielded little evidence of current asbestos contamination
(Ref. 4).
A 1988 study, commissioned by the City of Kenosha, and performed by Foth
and Van Dyke, found PCB's in the soil in excess of 50 ppm (Ref. 5). Numerous

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
heavy metals detected onsite include Lead, at concentrations of up to 2,900
ppm, Cadmium, Chromium and Arsenic.
Several improperly stored drums were discovered in the yard during the 1988
inspection; some containing small amounts of hazardous substances. Most
appeared empty, but at least one of the drums was overturned and its contents
spilled on the ground. There were also areas of black oily staining in the
yard.
The 1988 Foth & Van Dyke reported the presence of an underground storage tank
with an approximate capacity of between 200 and 250 gallons (ref. 5). There
is no indication that this tank has been removed. Significant VOC
contamination was found to a depth of 7.5' near the underground storage tank.
Current Status:
The Kenosha Iron and Metal property lies in the heart of four census tracts
that have been targeted by the City of Kenosha for redevelopment. The site is
on the border between the Columbus Park census tract (39X of the population
below the federal poverty level), and the Washington Park census tract (27.5X
of the population below the poverty level).
The block that contains the Kenosha Iron and Metal site also contains a row of
homes along the north, railroad tracks to the south, and a dilapidated
warehouse to the west. A major impediment to the redevelopment of this block
is the contaminated property.
Interviews with the residents bordering the site indicate that there is
significant runoff to the north and into the storm sewer on 55th St. that
discharges to the Kenosha Harbor. The owner of 2007 55th St. believes there is
at least one car frame buried behind his house. During sampling, a great deal
of metal scrap was encountered by WDNR personnel.

Site Investigation Results:
1.

Priority pollutant and recommended removal action levels (RALs)

The following sample results show contaminant concentrations in excess
of recommended RALs for Soil/Sediment. They are listed by sample location.
S01/S02Cadmium- 61.6/52.0 mg/kg
(residence) Lead512/557 mg/kg
S04Lead(residence)
S10LeadS12-

1070 mg/kg
535 mg/kg

Chromium-34800 mg/kg

WDNR Contact: Bill Ramsey
608-264-8962

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
CopperLead-

8790 rag/kg
3380 mg/kg

S13-

Chromium-35500 mg/kg
Copper22000 mg/kg
Lead3290 mg/kg
Nickel4030 mg/kg

S15-

Chromium-34100 mg/kg
Copper26300 mg/kg
Lead2440 mg/kg
Arochlor 1248- 620000 ug/kg
Arochlor 1254- 350000 ug/kg
Arochlor 1260- 44000 ug/kg
Total PCBs1,140,000 ug/kg

S17-

Arochlor 1248- 23000 ug/kg

S20-

Cadmium- 27.7 mg/kg
Chromium-1010 mg/kg
Lead501 mg/kg
Arochlor 1248- 61000 ug/kg
Total PCBs96000 ug/kg

Observed Releases:
The following are considered observed releases after taking into consideration
the qualifiers attached to the data as reported. For a complete list of
results and qualifiers, see reference 6. For sample locations, see reference
7, the SI sampling report.
Metals:
S01/S02-

Cadmium- 61.6/52.0 mg/kg
Lead512 mg/kg

S03-

Lead-

268 mg/kg

S04-

Cmdtad.uaL*«i•iciwl-

15.7 mg/kg
1070 mg/kg
59.6 mg/kg

S05-

Lead-

246 mg/kg

S06-

Lead-

329 mg/kg

S07-

Lead-

266 mg/kg

S08-

Lead-

278 mg/kg

S09-

Lead-

433 mg/kg

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
510-

CadmiumLeadNickel-

8.4 mg/kg
535 mg/kg
81.7 mg/kg

511-

Lead-

408 mg/kg

512-

Chromium-34800 mg/kg
Copper8790 mg/kg
Lead3380 mg/kg
Mercury- 3.9 mg/kg
Nickel411 mg/kg
Silver1010 mg/kg

513-

Chromium-35500 mg/kg
Copper22000 mg/kg
Lead3290 mg/kg
Nickel4030 mg/kg
Silver1030 mg/kg
Zinc6840 mg/kg

515-

Chromium-34100 mg/kg
Copper26300 mg/kg
Lead2440 mg/kg
Nickel1480 mg/kg
Silver1000 mg/kg

516-

Lead-

171 mg/kg

S17/S18-

LeadMercury-

279/211 mg/kg
1.3/1.7 mg/kg

S20-

Cadmium- 27.7 mg/kg
Chromium-1010 mg/kg
Copper2770 mg/kg
Lead501 mg/kg
Mercury- 4.1 mg/kg
Nickel1230 mg/kg

PCB/Pesticid**:
501-

AldrinHeptachlor EpoxideDieldrinEndrin AldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254-

12 ug/kg
5.5 ug/kg
24 ug/kg
33 ug/kg
890 ug/kg
930 ug/kg

502-

Aldrin-

11 ug/kg

VDNR Contact: Bill Ramsey
608-264-8962

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257

DieldrinArochlor 1254-

15 ug/kg
420 ug/kg

S03-

Heptachlor Epoxide- 6.4 ug/kg
Dieldrin20 ug/kg
Arochlor 1254740 ug/kg

S04-

gamma-BHCAldrinEndosulfan IEndrinEndrin AldehydeArochlor 1254-

14 ug/kg
22 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
33 ug/kg
21 ug/kg
1400 ugAg

S05-

gamma-BHCAldrin-

6.8 ug/kg
37 ug/kg

Dieldrin-

Arochlor 1254-

51 ug/kg
51 ug/kg
23 ugAg
1700 ugAg
1400 ugAg

S06-

Aldrin-

8.5 ug/kg

S07-

Heptachlor EpoxideDieldrinalpha-Chlordanegamma-Ch1o rdane-

9.7 ug/kg
16 ug/kg
55 ug/kg
44 ug/kg

S08-

DieldrinEndrinEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254-

110 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
19 ug/kg
3900 ugAg
4000 ug/kg

S09-

Heptachlor epoxideEndrinEadosulfan IIEndrln aldehydeA»chlor 1248Arcchlor 1254Arochlor 1260-

21 ug/kg
160 ug/kg
68 ug/kg
55 ug/kg
1600 ug/kg
12000 ugAg
1800 ug/kg

S10-

delta-BHCAldrinEndrinEndosulfan IIEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254-

6.5 ugAg
17 ugAg
47 ug/kg
18 ug/kg
37 ug/kg
1400 ug/kg
1200 ug/kg

EndrinEndrin aldehyde Arochlor 1248-

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257

AldrinEndrinArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254-

69 ug/kg
490 ug/kg
4300 ug/kg
4900 ug/kg

S13-

DieldrinEndrinEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254Arochlor 1260-

98 ug/kg
190 ug/kg
150 ug/kg
19000 ug/kg
8800 ug/kg
5900 ug/kg

515-

AldrinHeptachlor epoxideEndrinEndosulfan IIEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254Arochlor 1260-

4800 ug/kg
950 ug/kg
1600 ug/kg
550 ug/kg
650 ug/kg
620000 ug/kg
350000 ug/kg
44000 ug/kg

S17-

Aldrin340 ugAg
Endrin390 ug/kg
Endosulfan sulphate-42 ug/kg
Endrin ketone120 ug/kg
Endrin aldehyde210 ug/kg
Arochlor 124823000 ug/kg
Arochlor 12603200 ug/kg

S18-

AldrinEndrinEndosulfan IIEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254Arochlor 1260-

15 ug/kg
200 ugAg
69 ugAg
110 ug/kg
15000 ugAg
9000 ug/kg
1700 ug/kg

S20-

AldrinH*9Cachlor epoxideEndrinEndrin ketoneEndrin aldehydeArochlor 1248Arochlor 1254Arochlor 1260-

40 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
360 ugAg
270 ug/kg
490 ug/kg
61000 ug/kg
19000 ug/kg
16000 ugAg

S12-

VDNR Contact: Bill Ramsey
608-264-8962

Preliminary Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257

Resident Information
S01/S02-

Gerald Torres (4 residents)
2007 55th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140

S03-

Donna York (5 residents)
2001 55th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140

S04-

Judy Cerminara (4 residents)
1933 55th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140
(renter)

Janet M Perry Cogger
3011 26th Av.
Kenosha, WI 53140
(owner)

S05-

Clara Asta (2 residents)
1929 55th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140

Ann Bezotte et al.
(same-daughter)

S06-

Beverly Brown (10 residents)
1923 55th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140
(renter)

Dusan and Shezena Matic
c/o Misty Pines Homes
903 Washington Rd.
Kenosha, WI 53140
(owner)

S07-

vacant for remodelling

Irene Morris
513 66th St.
Kenosha, WI 53140
(owner- 414-652-7071)

S08-

Max Schmidt (2 residents)
5506 19th Av.
Kenosha, UI 53140

fcV
f CO
7007

-w

v

OQ

._

'I
I

-

f

November 8, L9'3
State of Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
Southeast District
2300 N.Dr. M a r t i n Luther Kir.g Jr. Dr.
P.O. Box 12436
Milwaukee, Wi. 53212
ATTN: Margaret M. Graefe
RE:

Property located at 5512/14 19th. Ave
Kenosha, Wi.

Ms. Margaret M. Graefe
Hydrageologist, Environmental Repair Program
We are in receipt of your letter dated October 28, 1991, and thank
you for sharing the information regarding the property located at
above mentioned address.
Please be advised that we ARE NOT the owners of said property.
We
were in the process of purchasing the property through a land
contract, but that contract was never fully executed by being
completely paid,the owner retained ownership to the property, while
we only had an interest in it. The terms of the contract had not been
fulfilled, therefore a deed was never in our possession. The
contract, according to the law, reverted back to it's original owner
Maurice Sabin
1175 Lake Cook Rd.
Northbrook, IL
60062
I trust that this takes care of the matter.

Sincerely,

Harold Federma

MAURICE SABIN
1175 LAKE COOK ROAD
NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062

September 9, 1993

Mr. Bill Ramsey
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
101 South Webster Street
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, Wisconsin 53707
Re:

Kenosha Iron & Metal
5512-1419th Avenue
Kenosha, Wisconsin

Dear Mr. Ramsey:
I have received your letter dated September 2, 1993. As I have previously informed your
office, I am not the owner of the above-referenced property. My name appears in the chain of
title only because I am the trustee of a land trust which holds legal title. The owners and their
last known address and telephone numbers are:
1)

Max Wolkomir
3670 Glendon Avenue, #238
Los Angeles, CA 90034
50% ownership
Phone: unknown

2)

Shirley Halper
600 Naples Court
Glcnvicw, IL 60025
25% ownership
Phone:(708)699-1355

Mr. Bill Ramsey
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
September 9, 1993
Page Two
3)

Dorothy Berenson
795421st Avenue
Kenosha, WI 53143
25% ownership
Phone:(414)652-7116

The request for permission to do environmental testing should be forwarded to the above
owners.

Sincerely,

Maurice Sabin
MS:ns
LET9

RFCF1VED
MAR221989
O.M.R. SED Hqtrs.
Milwaukee, Wl

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
FOR
BBNOSHA IRON & METAL COMPANY
5512/5514 19TH AVENUE
KENOSHA WISCONSIN

PREPARED BY
WILLIAM BOSLETT, CSP

\RNms I ' >MHI

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
KENOSBA IRON & METAL COMPANY
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

I.

INTRODUCTION

Carnow, Conibear i Associates, Ltd. (CCA) was retained by the
City of Kenosha, Wisconsin to conduct an asbestos survey at
Kenosha Iron & Metal Company, 5512/5514 19th Avenue, under CCA
Project No. 1756-01. The purpose of the survey was to locate,
identify and recommend appropriate action for asbestos-containing
material.
The survey of Kenosha Iron & Metal Company, 5512/5514 19th Avenue
was performed on July 27, 1988. The survey covered Building 1
including warehouse and garage area, Building 2 and lot area
(yard). Fifty-three bulk asbestos samples were collected from
the various buildings and outside buildings in the yard.
The
majority of samples were collected from the lot area (yard).
II.

SUMMARY

No asbestos-containing material was found in any of the
buildings.
Asbestos-containing material was, however, found
throughout the yard area.
Drawings showing sample locations and the location of asbestoscontaining material can be found in Table II. Sample results of
all bulk sample analysis are summarized in Table I.
III. RECOMMENDATIONS

It is CCA 1 s understanding that the surveyed property is to be
purchased by the City of Kenosha and converted into a playground.
Following completion of this survey, it is evident that remedial
action should be taken to eliminate potential hazards posed by
the presence of asbestos-containing materials in the lot area
(yard) prior to utilizing this area as a. playground.
CCA recommends the following steps be taken:
1.

Remove all asbestos-containing materials and debris from the
lot as identified in Summary Section II of this report.
a.

Asbestos Removal Specifications should be developed in
accordance with the requirements of the EPA Regulation
40 CFR Part 61, Subparts A and B, and OSHA Regulation
on Asbestos, 29 CFR 1910.1001 and all pertinent
federal, state and local regulations.

»*<.! ht \ :< '. \ ->'-i *i I

LJ

n
a
n

Asbestos Inspection Report
Kenosha Iron & Metal Company
Kenosha, Wisconsin
b.

Removal should be performed by a carefully selected,
qualified asbestos removal contractor working in
accordance with the Asbestos Removal Specifications.

c.

The removal project should be monitored by an
independent asbestos project manager to ensure all woric
is done in accordance with the specifications, and all
airborne fiber levels are acceptably low during
removal. Following removal, the asbestos project
manager should inspect the removal area for visible
traces of fugitive contamination in order to determine
whether the area is clean and decontaminated from
airborne asbestos fibers.

2.

Removal of asbestos-containing material in lot area (yard)
should include removal of at least 6 inches of dirt.

3.

The area should then be covered with 3 feet of subsoil,
followed by a 6 inch topsoil cover upon which grass or sod
may be planted.

4.

An interim program prior to removal should be developed and
implemented until all asbestos removal is accomplished.
This program should include routine surveillance of
identified materials for signs of disturbance. All visitors
to the site should be warned of the presence of asbestos and
the hazards of asbestos. All personnel on the site who may
come in contact with the asbestos should be trained in the
proper handling of asbestos material and should be required
to wear, as a minimum, half-mask respiratory protection with
dual HEPA filtered cartridges and disposable footwear.
Disposable clothing should also be required if persons are
required to handle the asbestos material.

Respectfully submitted,
CARNOW, CONIBEAR & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

William S. Boslett, CSP
Manager, Asbestos Projects
Industrial Hygienist
WSB:aj
14656-02

II

\ R M U V ). ' I S I H I \K h X-iS< H I M I •• I I l>

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
July 28, 1933
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KENOSKA, WISCONSIN

Sample
Number

Description

Condition3

CC83115

Roof material, Building 2

Damage

None*

CC83116

Tar roof material, Building 2

Damage

None*

CC88117

Tar roof material, Building 2

Damage

None*

CC88118

Tar roof material, Building 1

Damage

CC88119

Roof material, Building 1

Damage

CC88160

Roof material, Building 1

Damage

CC83120

1 ' x 1 ' brown floor tile, Office

Damage

None*

CC88121

1' x 1' brown floor tile, Office

Damage

None*

CC88161

1' x 1' brown floor tile, Office

Damage

None*

CC88122

4' x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

None*

CC88162

4' x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

None*

CC88163

4' x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

None*

CC88123

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,
Building 1

Damage

None*

CC88124

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,
Building 1

Damage

None*

CC83164

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,
Building 1

Damage

None*

CC88125

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

None*

CC88126

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

None*

CC88165

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

None*

CC88127

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Damage

None*

COMHI \n 4

irn

Asbestos Content13

W%-20% Chrysotile

None*
2Q%-3Q% Chrysotile -^

3

a

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
Page 2
July 28, 1988
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KEMOSHA, WISCONSIN

3
7
Sample
Number

„ (^
1 1
|

CC83128

Description

Conditiona

Asbestos Content"3

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Damage

50$-60$ Chrysotile

-W

CC88166

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Damage

None*

-tTi

CC88129

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

5051-60$ Chrysotile

1
i

CC88130

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

55%-65% Chrysotile

t*
1

CC88131

Damage

50J-60* Chrysotile

M

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

CC88132

Dirt sample, outside building yard

1

iMJI

1J-5J Chrysotile

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

Trace-1? Chrysotile

CC88135

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

None*

Jjl

CC88136

Damage

L

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

jj

CC88137

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

4rdv

CC88138

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

-L^

CC88139

Damage

None*

P
I.

Tile particle, outside building yard

CC88140

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

|

n
"T^

rW
•
ilUl

CC88133
CC8813H

fl

IB i

^ ct:
-^
[

| < \RMHs KlSim vK •» \-sOi |\r»s LTD

\%-5% Chrysotile

Mi-5% Chr-ysotile

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS

Page 3
July 28, 1988
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
L

Sample
Number

Description

Condition3

j

CC83T41

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None'

CC881U2

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC88U3

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

Mi-5% Chrysotile

CC881U4

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

Mi-5% Chrysotile

CC381H5

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

1J-5* Chrysotile

CC881U6

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

"\%-5% Chrysotile

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

5$-15$ Chrysotile

Damage

1%-5% Chrysotile

I1
j
1
1
•
|

CC881U7

Asbestos Content53

1

CC88U8

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

I

CC88149

Dirt sample, outside building yard

I

CC88150

White insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

.

CC88151

Grey insulation particle

Damage

None*

'

CC88152

Tan insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC88153

Brown insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

No sample

CC8815U

Black insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

1
1

None*

•

1

( \ K N i i u i i >S;H! \ n •« \--i •> • \ M -

lie

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
Page 4

July 28, 1933
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KSMOSHA, WISCONSIN
Sample
Number

Description

Condition5

Asbestos Content 0

CC83155

Tile insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC38156

White insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC88157

Grey insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC88153

Grey insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC38159

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

None*

CC83160

Roof material, outside building yard

Damage

None*

- Denotes "none detected by the method".
Condition - Visual determination of material condition and assessment of
damage or deterioration. "Damage" ranges from none to severe. "Severe"
indicates that damage is widespread with dislodged pieces of material.
"Deteriorated" refers to a condition of accelerated aging of both service
jacket and interior pipe insulation. Deterioration is widespread but lacking
the signs of actual physical damage. The combination of "deterioration and
damaged" is used to describe conditions in which widespread aging as well as
"friable", "powdery", "hard clay", etc., are used to describe visual
characteristics of the material beneath the outer service jacket.

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS

Page 5
July 23, 1933
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

- Asbestos Content - Analysis was performed by polarized light microscopy
using the dispersion staining method described in the Federal Register,
Vol. 47, No. 103, 40 CFR, Part 793, page 23360, published May 27, 1932.
This method provides a quantitative identification of the fibrous material
component. The asbestos minerals: chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite,
anthophyllite and tremolite-actinolite, can all be individually quantitated
and identified by this method. The reproducibility of the method, however,
has an inherent error factor of approximately -5% (plus or minus five
percent in the sample preparation technique and the point counting method of
determining fiber percentage. The asbestos minerals in this column are
identified and recorded with the -5% error in percent concentration.
1U655T-01

TABLE I

1
11

3

0UOIX OnTTI^LtCi

Sa.-nple
Nunber

Description

Condition^

CC33115

Roof material, Building 2

Damage

MClOE. %-

CC88116

Tar roof material, Building 2

Damage

VjOKiS.

CC83117

Tar roof material, Building 2

Damage

Mo»0£ ~&

CC38113

Tar roof material, Building 1

Damage

CC88119

Roof material, Building 1

Damage

CC38160

Roof material, Building 1

Damage

^0-Jo'/. CHKYSonue

CC33120

T x T brown floor tile, Office

Damage

lOOlUG" ^t

CC88121

1' x T

brown floor tile, Office

Damage

Uo/U^T ^

CC88161

1' x T brown floor tile, Office

Damage

WO^E %•

CC88122

U' x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

00 O£

CC88162

4' x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

nouS

CC88163

V x 2' white ceiling tile, Office

No damage

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,

Damage

fl
a
i1

g

iVC»JVU* L*J

July 23, 1933
LOT 5512 4 55 14 19TH AVSNUE
KEM03HA, WISCONSIN

CC88123

Asbestos Content

#-

|0~~£O fo dHPs^SCTJf— tH
KJOUE

^

-^
-fa-

yjoiOtS.

"^

tjo O & -^

Building 1
CC88124

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,
Building 1

Damage

CC8816U

Brown wall insulation, warehouse,
Building 1

Damage

CC88125

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

CC88126

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

CC88165

White mortar wall, Office

Damage

CC83127

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Damage

CC33128

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Damage

UO/UEl

uooe.

*

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
Pa
5e 2
July 23, 1933
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVEMUS
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

rn
LH

fTJ
Sample
Number

Description

Conditiona

.,

rrQA 1 *£,

Machinery insulation, Building 2

Ul

Damage

CC33129

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

CC88130

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

LU

CC38131

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

[H

CC33132

1LIBd

Dirt sample, outside building yard

CC88133

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

M

CC88134

Damage

u*\A£-^-

TjLj

Tile particle, outside building yard

CC88135

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

kjOfJfcc ~fcr

1

CC88136

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

\-5 /o CH^VSC.'

T

CC88137

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

IJO|UE= ^f-

j

CC83133

Damage

*00 VjG" £-

n

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

T*

CC83139

Tile particle, outside building yard

Damage

1)0 U £ 'f

LP •'

CC881UO

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

kJOOE -f&

1
^
[Jj

CC88141

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Dama

i...,r-

rW
I

ill

M-*

Lvf
III

(jj

a
L

f

I

, \ -\

A

v

.».:.. v- ••••

\' • - • : : >

Asbestos Content
(03 OGE. T^~(\^/~^°/
55~£>S/o

/

t

^e

C.H^SOT[i_

*••' / w

\-5°/o

CH^SGTfL-

^

1 /<> Ct"^ —

£i

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
Page 3
July 23, 1988
LOT 5512 4 5514 19TH AVENUE
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

[llll
I
Sample
| • flj
Number Description

Condition5

Asbestos Content

|-X-f4

CC83142

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

-1-

CC38143

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

\-5 %

CHWSoTlLr

1

CCSam

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

'~b~7*

CrtMSoTI

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

\~^/o CH^So'
1-5

tOo^G *fc-

^^ O/

|

CC88145

|^

CC88146

Damage

ITI rriU

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

CC88U7

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

CC38148

Pipe insulation, outside building yard

Damage

E

.J
J

CC831H9

Dirt sample, outside building yard

fr -•

CC88150

fc-X-^

fe

CHP-VSo

5-15 %

CKM SoT

\~$'ft

CHM^T,

-*,
1

Daua^u.

j^oO £

4

White insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

^^

^

CC88151

Grey insulation particle

Damage

k}0<f£

^

^T<

CC33152

Tan insulation part-'ole, outside
building - yard

Damage

IJOOE

^

*-T*

CC83153

Brown insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

^

(IP

CC88154

Black insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

KPIOS

jjjl

CC88155

Tile insulation particle, outside

Damage

, . g-

-i

building - yard

I

|

i \ •< \ • • \\ i i • -. : • • x v •. \ - - • i ' v :

Sft^PLfc.
^
^

TABLE I
BULK SAMPLE RESULTS
Page
July 23, 1933
LOT 5512 4 5514 igTH AVENUE
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

1

1

Sample
Number

j

Description

Conditiona

CC88156

White insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

CC33157

Grey insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

^CKJfcS

CC88153

Grey insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

IOOK3EE. "k-

CC88159

Insulation particle, outside
building - yard

Damage

00 ^ G *-

CC38160

Roof material, outside building yard

Damage

3
\I
1

I

Asbestos Content 0
NcuE ft
h

20-3^7° CWPxYSC:7

* - Denotes "none detected by the method".
- Condition - Visual determination of material condition and assessment of
damage or deterioration. "Damage" ranges from none to severe. "Severe"
indicates that damage is widespread with dislodged pieces of material.
"Deteriorated" refers to a condition of accelerated aging of both service
jacket and interior pipe insulation. Deterioration is widespread but lacking
the signs of actual physical damage. The combination of "deterioration and
damaged" is used to describe conditions in which widespread aging as well as
"friable", "powdery", "hard clay", etc., are used to describe visual
characteristics of the material beneath the outer service jacket.
- Asbestos Content - Analysis was performed by polarized light microscopy
using the dispersion staining method described in the Federal Register,
Vol. 47, Mo. 103, 40 CFR, Part 793, page 23360, published May 27, 1932.
This method provides a quantitative identification of the fibrous material
component. The asbestos minerals: chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite,
anthophyllite and tremolite-actinolite, can all be individually quantitated
and identified by this method. The reproducibility of the method, however,
has an inherent error factor of approximately -55t (plus or minus five
percent in the sample preparation technique and the point counting method of
determining fiber percentage. The asbestos minerals in this column are
identified and recorded with the -5$ error in percent concentration.
14655T-00

S j v p 1 i r. 3 a r e a I . D . :
Description:
YARD

Ai

I
I

i in
ua

Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors: Cabot / Osowski
Date Inspected: July 27, 1993

Description:

ill

tit
Ert
trt

in
Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors: Cabot / Osowski
Date Inspected: July 27, 1988
'i— j *ji *^rj

Descnption:

30

• 6U>

(D

00

8

1.1

li

3
IJ
1!

Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors: Cabot / Osowski
Date Inspected: July 27, 1988

Samp l i n g area I.D.
Mi
Description:
WH TE. MQPkTA?N WAUL--

30

VS

Oo

Mo,
6LD.

o

ro

Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors: Cabot / Osowski
J 'j 1 y 27, 1 9 '= 3
Date-Inspect ed

8?

S.i.-pl :.~.3 a r e a I . D. :
Description: ^

ML

1

11

a
d
g

a

CfF)CE

Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors: Cabot / Osowski
Date Inspected: July 21, 1933

S o r p i in g j r e j I .D . :
Description:

I-M.

flFDCE

Site: Kenosha Metal Co.
Address: 5512 5514 19th
Inspectors:
Cabot / Osowski
Date Inspected: J u l y 27, 1988

Descriot.cn:

n
c
LI
BH

&

in
tn

c

0

ro 00

IH

ni

M

in

I

o?

°5

.
"

BLD. No
6LD. * I

t»v

u
o
••i

j

278

&
Metal Co.
5512 5514 19th
Cabot /
In
sp^cted: July 27, 1938

ress:

Sarp 1 inq a r e J
Description:

I.

30

u3

tin

o,
o§

ro

. BU)

8§
i
OM
I

N
*>* .
*> ^ O

IS

BLD. NS I

f

Sl

te: Kenosha Metal Co.
"Address:
D u r e s s : 55512 5514 19th
I n s p e c t o r s : Cabot / Osowski
D<
ate I n s p e c t e d
J u l y 27, 1938

6LD. * I

CC88I2.0
-OrricE

INFORMATION REGARDING BULK ASBESTOS/AN.
BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Wisconsin Occupational Health Laboratory^
Reference Method
The reference method used for analysis was the EPA-600/M4-82-I
Interim Method. Based on this method, a material containing
>1% asbestos concentration is considered positive for
asbestos.
Analytical Procedure
Samples are initially examined with a binocular stereoscope.
A small portion of each sample is then mounted on a glass
slide with a few drops of a specific Cargille high dispersion
refractive index liquid. The mounted portion of the sample is
then examined at various magnifications utilizing Polarized
Light Microscopy with dispersion staining techniques to
determine the identities and percentages of the six varieties
of asbestos which may be present.
These varieties of
asbestos, one or more of which may be present in varying
combinations and percentages, include CHRYSOTILE, AMOSITE,
CROCIDOLITE, ANTHOPHYLLITE, TREMOLITE and ACTINOLITE.
All samples which have been determined by PLM to contain less
than five percent asbestos are subjected to further analysis
utilizing FTIR Spectrometer.
This method involved pulverizing the sample to a fine,
homogeneous powder with the liquid nitrogen cooled grinding
mill, mixing the powdered sample with Potassium Bromide,
pressing the mixture into a pellet, and scanning the pellet to
determine the percentage of asbestos present in the sample
versus a known standard. In the event that the FTIR analysis
differs from the original PLM analysis, the sample is
rechecked by PLM. FTIR analysis is used only as a quality
control check and is sometimes subject to interference from
the pelletized sample. Therefore, all final results are
determined by PLM analysis only.
Instrumentation
The instruments used were a polarized light microscope
equipped with a lOx dispersion staining objective, 2x, lOx and
20x pol objectives and a Nicolet FTIR spectrometer.
Quantitation Limit:

<1% asbestos present

Quality control performed as required by NVLAP
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.)
NVLAP lab code #1109

d:\deeann\cover\plm

(National

979 Jonathon Drive
Madison, WI 53713-3226
Phone: (608)263-6550
FAX: (608) 263-6551

WISCONSIN STATE
LABORATORY OF HYGIENE
In reply please refer to:
Wisconsin Occupational Health Laboratory

University of Wisconsin
Center for Health Sciences

10/11/93

WI DNR-Air Prog Particulates
GEF II
PO Box 7921
Madison, WI 53703
Dear Joe Brehm:
The results for the analyses of the bulk asbestos samples we
received on 09/29/93 are as follows:
Field f

Lab t»

Sample Description

Kenosha Iron & MetalS09

25225

Black tile and soil

Kenosha Iron & Metalsio

25226

Black tile and soil

Kenosha Iron & MetalSll

25227

Gray/brown roofing and aoil

Kenosha Iron & Metal514

25228

Brown/black roofing

Kenosha Iron & Metal516
Kenosha Iron & Metal5l7
Kenosha Iron & MecalSSO

25229
25230
25231

Gray/brown ceiling tile
Reddish brown gasket
Brown ceiling tile

Project

JohrtrKnigh
Analyst

% Asbestos
Chry
Amo

Comments
>1% chrysotile present in tile pieces
Cellulose 5%, synthetics, carbs, clay
Cellulose, fiberglass, quartz, mineral
grains and clay
Cellulose, synthetics, quartz, mineral
grains and clay
Cellulose 95%, mineral grains and
asphalt matrix

0
25
0

Date Analyzed

This report relates only to the items tested and shall not be used to claim
product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Cellulose 100%
Metal base
Cellulose 100%

979 Jonathon Drive
Madison, WI 53713-3226
Phone: (608)263-6550
FAX: (608)263-6551

WISCONSIN STATE
LABORATORY OF HYGIENE
In reply please refer to:

University of Wisconsin
Center for Health Sciences

Wisconsin Occupational Health Laboratory
Continued
Field tt Lab tt

Project

Sample Decription

% Asbestos
Chry
Amo

Kenosha Iron & MetalSSl

25232

Gray & brown insulation & soil

a

Kenosha Iron & Metal552

25233

Multi colored floor t shingle

0

Kenosha Iron & Metal553
Kenosha Iron & MetalS53A
Kenosha Iron & Metal554

25234
25235
25236
25237

White plaster
Gray/white plaster
Gray/yellow wrap paper
Dark gray transite

Kenosha Iron & MetalSSS

0
0
0
25

Comments
Synthetics, quartz, mineral grains
and clay
Cellulose 50%, synthetics 5V, quartz,
carbonates, min grains, asphalt matrix
Carbonates and binder
Quartz, carbonates and mineral binder
Cellulose 95* and mineral binder
Portland cement

Chry & Amo are abbreviations for chrysotile asbestos and amosite asbestos.

Analysis was performed by EPA interim method EPA-600/M4-82-020,
and confirmed where necessary by FTIR, X-ray Diffraction and TEM.
If a sample was inhomogeneous, each subsample was analyzed separately
and results were combined to produce the above concentration.
If you have any questions, please call the lab at 608 263-6550.
Sincerely yours,

Asbestos Section Head

Joljfi Knight
Analyst

Date Analyzed

This report relates only to the items tested and shall not be used to claim
product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

WISCONSIN ASBESTOS PROJECT - BULK

M a i l samples and form to:
C o l l e c t bulk samples in containers
such as small jars, f i l m canisters
or p r e s c r i p t i o n bottles.

Wisconsin Occupational Health Lab
979 Jonathon Drive
Madison, Wisconsin 53713
Phone: 608 263-6550

PLASTIC BAGS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.

Date Received at Lab

Lab #

Field #

T^ge of M a t e r i a l

RUSH

Locat i on

37

SEMD

B I L L TO:

RESULTS TO:

P.O. *
Project # _j>_<
SITE NAME:

CONTACT PERSON:

t
\

COMMENTS:

PHONE t:

January 1990

Foth & Van Dyke
REPORT

—K
PF
p1F1I \Vi
t U
MAR 2 2 1969
J.N.R. SED hq. s.
Milwaukee, Wl

Environmental Site Assessment
Kenosha Iron & Metals Co. Property
Kenosha, Wisconsin
Phase II Summary Report
Scope I.D.: 88K23.

City of Kenosha
Redevelopment Authority

August 1988

j
J
i
J

Foth & Van Dyke
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. O. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wl 54307-9012
414/497-2500

Foth & Van Dyke
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. O. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wl 54307-9012
414/497-2500

August 18,

1988

Ms. Sharon Krewson
Real Estate Agent
Department of City Development
625 52nd Street, Room 301

88K23-04

Kenosha, Wisconsin 53140
Dear Ms. Krewson:
RE:

Summary Phase II Report
Environmental Site Assessment
Kenosha Iron & Metal Co., Inc.

Foth & Van Dyke is pleased to submit to you our enclosed
report titled Environmental Site Assessment. Kenosha Iron &
Metals Co. Property. Kenosha. Wisconsin — Phase II Summary
Report.
As per your request, we are enclosing four copies of the
report for your distribution.
You will also find enclosed one copy of the report titled
Asbestos Inspection Report for Kenosha Iron & Metal Company.
5512/5514 19th Avenue. Kenosha. Wisconsin, prepared by Carnow,
Conibear & Associates, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois. This copy
is the one which they sent to Foth & Van Dyke; however, as you
have not yet received your copy of the report, it is enclosed
for your convenience.
Please call Dr. Richard Burbidge, who is the Manager of our
Department of Environmental Compliance and Remediation, or
myself if you have any questions regarding our work.
Sincerely,
FOTH & VAN DYKE

Bruce H. Burton

Senior Project Geologist
BHB:kmc
Enclosure

DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of Copies

Sent to
Ms. Sharon Krewson
Real Estate Agent
Department of City Development
625 52nd Street, Room 301
Kenosha, Wisconsin 53140

88K23

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
OF KENOSHA IRON & METALS CO. PROPERTY
KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
PHASE II SUMMARY REPORT

Prepared for:
CITY OF KENOSHA/REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Prepared by:
FOTH & VAN DYKE and Associates, Inc.
2737 S. Ridge Road
Green Bay, Wisconsin

AUGUST 1988

Foth & Van Dyke
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. O. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wiiconiin 54307-9012
414/497-2500

Copyright©, Foth & Van Dyke and Associates Inc.
1988

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
1.0

INTRODUCTION

1

1.1
1.2

1
1

Contents of Report
Summary of Findings

2. 0

SCOPE OF WORK

3

3.0

SITE DESCRIPTION

4

3.1
3.2
3.3

4
5
6

4. 0

SITE BACKGROUND INFORMATION
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5

5.0

6.0

Legal Description
Physical Description
Cultural Description
."

8

General Information
Buildings & Facilities
Process Description
Underground Tank
Potential Environmental Hazards

8
8
10
11
11

DESCRIPTION OF PHASE II SITE INVESTIGATION

14

5.1
5.2
5.3
5. 4

14
14
15
16

General
Soil Borings and Sampling
Field Procedures
Asbestos Survey

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

17

6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4

17
17
18
19

General
Summary of Analyses - Heavy Metals
Summary of Analyses - Priority Pollutant VOCs .
Summary of Analyses - PCBs

7.0

CONCLUSIONS

21

8.0

RECOMMENDATIONS

23

88K23

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. 1

Location Map

FIGURE NO. 2

Site Map

LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A:

Boring Logs

APPENDIX B:

Photographs of Boring Locations

APPENDIX C:

Analytical Results, Heavy Metals

APPENDIX D:

Analytical Results, Volatile Organic Compounds

APPENDIX E:

Analytical Results, Polychlorinated biphenyls

APPENDIX F:

Chain-of-Custody Records

88K23

1.0

INTRODUCTION

1.1

Contents of Report

Foth & Van Dyke has conducted Phase II of an Environmental
Site Assessment on a parcel of land located at 5512/14 19th
Avenue, City of Kenosha, County of Kenosha, State of
Wisconsin. This parcel of land, which is currently owned by
Harold R. Federman and Roy M. Federman, is inactive but was
formerly occupied by a scrap metal recovery facility.
Foth & Van Dyke and Associates Inc. was requested by Sharon
Krewson of the Kenosha Department of City Development to
perform this Phase II investigation.
Results of the Phase I Background Investigation of this site
were given in a letter report to Ms. Krewson entitled
Environmental Site Assessment, Kenosha Iron & Metal Co., Inc.f
Phase I - Background Investigation. The present report
summarizes pertinent facts and conclusions from the Phase I
report and presents results of the Phase II investigation.
1.2

Summary of Findings

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been found to be present
in soils at this property. PCBs are toxic substances and are
carcinogens (cancer-causing). Two of five samples were
reported by the analytical laboratory to contain levels of
PCBs in excess of 50 parts per million (ppm). It is highly
probable that amounts of PCB-bearing materials in excess of 10
pounds (approximately one gallon) have been spilled on this
site.
According to the Federal Superfund law (CERCLA - Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980), this spill site must be reported to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the owner of the
property. Additionally, remediation of the property must be
88K23

undertaken. Remediation of the property would take place as
defined under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) under
the supervision of the EPA.
Heavy metals were also found in the soils sampled in the yard.
Analyses were performed for lead, cadmium, chromium, and
arsenic. Of these, lead is of primary concern, as levels of
up to 2,900 ppro were reported by the analytical laboratory.
Present data suggest that levels of lead in the soil may, in
certain areas of the property, exceed levels of toxicity set
by the Resource Recovery and Control Act (RCRA). If this is
the case, the site would have to be remediated with respect to
lead according to RCRA guidelines before any use or
development of the property could take place.
Asbestos fibers have been reported by Carnow, Conibear and
Associates to be present in relatively high concentrations in
the yard soils, in roofing materials discarded in the yard,
and in roofing materials used in the buildings on site. The
site would have to be remediated with respect to asbestos
according to TSCA guidelines before any use or development of
the property could take place.
Foth & Van Dyke finds that there is evidence of significant
environmental impairment present at the site owned by Kenosha
Iron and Metal Co., Inc. There is also potentially
significant financial liability for the owner of the site.
Under Federal law, any purchaser of this property would assume
direct financial responsibility for remediation of existing
environmental problems.

88K23

2 .0

SCOPE OF WORK

Phase I work on the Kenosha Iron & Metals Co. site identified
several specific sites in the yard and buildings as having
significant potential for environmental impairment. A program
involving drilling, sampling, and analysis of soil samples was
proposed as a Phase II program for the site. These activities
were designed to assess the degree of environmental impairment
present at the site.
A total of nine soil borings completed. Two were driven by
hand auger inside structures on the site, and the other seven
were completed using a hollowstem auger drilling rig. Fortythree (43) samples were taken from these borings. The samples
were analyzed, as appropriate, for selected representative
heavy metals (lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic), "priority
pollutant" volatile organic compounds (VOCs, including
benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). A photo-ionization detector
(PID) was used to monitor organic vapors during drilling and
to select samples for VOC analysis.
The results of the analyses are presented herein, followed by
conclusions and recommendations.

88K23

3.0

SITE DESCRIPTION

3.1

Legal Description

The following is the legal description of the property which
is the subject of the Environmental Site Assessment, as
supplied to Foth & Van Dyke by Ms. Sharon Krewson of the
Kenosha Department of City Development:
A tract or parcel of land including within its boundaries, Lot
Two (2) (except the North 4.40 feet thereof and a part of Lot
Three (3) all in Block Four (4) of risk's Addition to the City
of Kenosha, according to the recorded plat thereof, which said
tract or parcel of land is more particularly bounded and
described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a rail monument, in
the West line of Nineteenth (19th) Avenue, distant, 27.80 feet
south of its point of intersection with the south line of
Fifty-Fifth (55th) Street, which point is also the Southeast
corner of the land conveyed by the Chicago and North Western
Railway Company to Charles C. Borwn [Brown?] by Quit Claim
Deed dated February 27, 1896; thence South along the West line
of 19th Avenue 120.80 feet; thence Southwesterly along a line
forming an angle of 85°55/ (in the southwest quadrant) with
said West line of 19th Avenue a distance of 169.16 feet;
thence northwesterly along a line forming an angle of 14°13'
with an extension of the last described course a distance of
296 feet, more or less, to the West line of Lot'Three (3) in
said Block Four (4); thence North along the West line of Lots
Two (2) and Three (3) in said Block Four (4) a distance of
80.00 feet, more or less, to a rail monument at the southwest
corner of the land so conveyed by said deed of February 27,
1896; thence East along the south line of the land so conveyed
by said deed of February 27, 1896, a distance of 459.42 feet,
more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 52,359
square feet, more or less. Being part of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 31, Town 2, Range 23. The Tax Key number
of the property is 12-223-31-334-021.

88K23

3 .2

Physical Description

Examination of the Kenosha 7.5 minute U.S. Geological Survey
topographic map (1955; photo-revised 1982) shows the site to
be at an elevation of approximately 622 feet above mean sea
level. The general terrain in the area of the scrap yard
facility is a low-relief surface with a slope generally to the
east at approximately 17 feet per mile. This slope steepens
east of the site, assuming a gradient of about 30 feet per
mile.
Soils in the site area belong to the Hebron-Montgomery-Ashkum
association, which consists generally of well-drained to
poorly drained soils that have a loam to silty clay subsoil.
These soils are underlain by clayey to loamy lacustrine and
outwash material (Soil Survey of Kenosha and Racine Counties,
Wisconsin, 1970, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture). The specific
soil unit r.apped onto the site is "loamy land", consisting of
"filled and leveled areas where the fill is mainly a mixture
of soil materials".
Within the yard area, the uppermost soils consist of medium to
fine-grained sand to silty or clayey sand. The upper few
inches to several feet of this soil contain fragments of
metal, ceramics, coal, and miscellaneous debris. This unit is
underlain by one to several feet of clean, medium-grained
sand. The top of a layer of stiff clay is present at a depth
which varies from four to eight feet beneath the yard. The
average thickness of the clay layer is not known, but two
borings indicate a minimum thickness of approximately 4 feet.
The probable direction of groundwater flow in this area, based
upon topography, is to the east toward Lake Michigan. Lake
Michigan lies approximately 1 mile east of the property.
Depth to groundwater is estimated to be about 40 feet at this
site.

88K23

3.3

Cultural Description

The scrap yard property is located within a mixed neighborhood
consisting of industrial and residential properties. The
northeast corner of the property is located approximately 30
feet south of the southwest corner of the intersection of 52nd
Avenue and 55th Street. Figure No. 1 is a location map which
shows the Kenosha Iron & Metal Co. property.
The scrap yard is bordered on the north by residences, and on
the west by residences and industrial property. Railroad
tracks border the south side of the scrap yard, with
industrial and residential properties south of the tracks.
East of the scrap yard is 52nd Avenue; across the street is an
industrial property.

88K23

SCHOOL

PARK

55th

ST.

LU

<

KENOSHA IRON & METAL CO.

a NW RR

CD

56th

ST.

N

KENOSHA

I R O N a METAL CO
FIGURE NO. I

LOCATION
SCALE:

|

« 100

PREPARED BY: FOTH &

MAP

DATE:

VAN DYKE

6-30-88

EVi 9HB
88K23

4.0

SITE BACKGROUND INFORMATION

1.l

General Information

The owners of the site are Harold R. Federman and Roy M.
Federman. Harold Federman is the contact person for this
study. The Federmans purchased the business and property
about five years ago from a Mr. & Mrs. Ruppa. Mr. Ruppa is
deceased; Mrs. Ruppa still lives in Kenosha.
According to Harold Federman and a neighborhood resident, who
has lived in the area since 1953, the site has been a scrap
yard for at least the past 40 years. Prior to its use as a
scrap yard, the property was reportedly used as a coal storage
yard. The property comprises approximately 56,000 square
feet.

4.2

Buildings & Facilities

Figure No. 2 is a sketch map of the scrap yard premises.
Three buildings are located on the site. The main building,
which measures approximately 75 feet by 56 feet, is of mixed
brick and cement block construction, and has a concrete floor
approximately three inches in thickness. Attached to the main
building is a 22 foot by 22 foot shed constructed of wood.
The floor of the shed is half wood, and half dirt. The third
structure is separate from the first two; constructed of
cement blocks, it measures approximately 22 feet by 16 feet.
The main building is reported by the owner to have been
constructed in the 1920s, although it has the appearance of
having been repaired or added onto from time to time since
then. The building contains office space (about 30 feet by 30
feet) and open warehouse space. The warehouse space is "L"
shaped and measures approximately 3,240 square feet.

88K23

SURFACE -

DRUMS
MAIN
BUILDING

TB-I
-SCALE

HB-I
TANK
WOODEN_
SHED

BATTERY
STORAGE^^

I®

e HB-2

TB-2

STEEL
PIPES

AIR
CONDITIONERS'

e SOIL BORINGS
© SURFACE SAMPLES
PALLETS

PILE

-

^^ SURFACE-2
THIN ©,

ALUM a

STEEL

TB-3

STEEL WIRE

r

XVAULT

CRUSHER-3ALER_
BLDG

•LARGE EQPT

- —^
TB-5

I
/

\

SURFACE-3

TB-6,

TB-7

e

n

TRAILERS

KENOSHA IRON 8 METAL CCX
FIGURE NO.2
S I T E MAP
• I • 50
ED 5>: F O T M &

*L: 6 - 3 0 - 8 6
VAN

DYKE

BHB

I

The date of construction of the wooden shed is unknown. Mr.
Federman stated that the previous owner, Mr. Ruppa, used the
shed to store batteries. Mr. Federman used the shed to store
tires, welding gases, and a truck tractor.
The third building houses machinery for crushing and baling of
scrap metal. A concrete-lined vault approximately four feet
deep extends about 16 feet in front of the building and
contains additional machinery.
4.3

Process Description

The primary business carried on at the site involved the
purchase and acceptance of scrap metal, followed by sorting,
sizing, and resale. Both ferrous and non-ferrous metals were
handled, with ferrous metals primarily handled out in the open
yard, and non-ferrous metals handled in the warehouse area of
the main building.
Oversize pieces of ferrous scrap metal were cut apart with
welding torches or cut up with heavy shears mounted in the
south-central part of the yard. After sizing, the pieces were
baled, or if appropriate, crushed and then baled. Mr.
Federman reported that he stopped using the crusher
approximately four and one-half years ago.
Non-ferrous metals were hand-sorted into storage containers in
the main building. An aluminum smelter was used to reduce
scrap aluminum to ingots.
The Kenosha Iron and Metal Co. accepted batteries. Mr.
Federman stated that he did not crush or cut the batteries^
but stored them on pallets at a location in the yard which he
pointed out. When sufficient batteries had accumulated, he
bundled them together and shipped them to a third party for
processing.

10

88K23

Mr. Federman stated that he did not accept either transformers
or asbestos-covered piping, as he was aware that these could
be environmentally sensitive substances. However, he conceded
that there could be asbestos mixed in with some of the yard
material, as it was "impossible to examine every truckload".
4.4

underground Tank

There is an underground storage tank on the property, which
was used to store diesel fuel. The tank was reported to be of
approximately 200 to 250 gallons capacity. Approximately 200
gallons of diesel fuel were added to the tank about every
third week, according to Mr. Federman.
The vent riser for the tank is located on the south side of
~he main building, approximately four feet east of the
southwest corner. The surface location of the vent riser does
not mark the location of the tank, as the riser exhibits a
right-angle bend about half a foot below grade. The vent
riser extends about one foot above grade, and the opening is
covered by an old metal can.
The fill riser is located inside the building, about 6 feet
north of the vent riser. A rod inserted into the fill riser
extended approximately five feet into the floor and into the
interior of the tank. The tank is therefore located beneath
the concrete floor slab. A pump for dispensing of the fuel is
located inside the southwest corner of the building.
Approximately 22 gallons of diesel fuel were removed from the
tank by a salvage company between the time of Foth & Van
Dyke's Phase I Background Investigation and Phase II field
work.
4.5

Potential Environmental Hazards

Several sites in the yard and buildings of the Kenosha Iron
and Metal Co. were identified, on the basis of the Phase I
background investigation, as having significant potential for
11

88K23

environmental impairment. Recommendations were made to
investigate each of the several areas discussed in the
following paragraphs.
It was considered likely that the soil of the yard has been
contaminated with various heavy metals. This was because the
yard has been used for many years to store scrap metals much
of which may be assumed to have been plated with various
substances.
The long-term leaching effect of rain-water was
considered likely to have concentrated heavy metals in the
soils. Foth & Van Dyke suggested that toxic metals,
consisting of lead, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic, be sampled
for in the soil.
It was learned by Foth & Van Dyke that batteries had been
stored in at least two places on the property - in the wooden
shed, and in a location in the open yard on pallets. It was
judged possible that acid solutions from the batteries might
have leaked onto the ground, and that there would be potential
for significant lead contamination at these sites.
Hydraulic machinery was used on the site. Leaks of hydraulic
fluid might have occurred from this machinery. The vault in
front of the building containing the crusher/baler appeared to
be contaminated with an oily organic substance.
The underground storage tank containing diesel fuel was
recommended for investigation. The age of the tank was
unknown. Old tanks and tank piping are prone to leakage.
Therefore, Foth & Van Dyke recommended that the soil in the
vicinity of the tank be sampled and checked for the presence
of BETX (benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes).
Several areas of soil within the yard were observed to be
discolored and "oily", presumably caused by leaks or spills of
unknown types of oils. Sampling for PCBs (polychlorinated
biphenyls) was suggested by Foth & Van Dyke as a precautionary
measure.
12

88K23

Improperly stored drums containing small amounts of hazardous
substances were discovered in the yard. Most of the drums on
the property appeared to be empty of their original contents.
However, at least one of these drums, containing a resin
solution, was discovered to have spilled a portion of its
contents as a result of being overturned.
Strong-smelling
organic vapors were detected within this drum during the Phase
I Background Investigation.
According to statements made by Mr. Harold Federman, plus
observations made by Foth & Van Dyke personnel, there was
reason to suspect that some amount of asbestos might be found
on the property. The City of Kenosha had also requested
specifically for an asbestos survey of the property.

13

88K23

5.0

DESCRIPTION OF PHASE II SITE INVESTIGATION

5.1

General

The scope of work for Phase II of the environmental site
assessment performed on the Kenosha Iron and Metal Company
property was based on information obtained during the initial
site walk-through and during the Phase I Background
Investigation. The following paragraphs summarize the
activities of Foth & Van Dyke during Phase II.
5.2

Soil Borings and sampling

Foth & Van Dyke drilled nine (9) soil borings, 5 to 12 feet in
depth, at the.locations shown on Figure No. 2. These borings
were designed to provide information sufficient to assess the
degree of contamination present in the soil beneath the site.
The nine borings had the following objectives:
HB-1

A hand-augered soil test boring adjacent to the
underground tank, designed to test for BETX and
other VOCs.

HB-2

A hand-augered soil test boring within the wooden
storage shed, designed to check for heavy metals in
the soil due to battery storage.

TB-1

A soil test boring in the area where the drums
contained resin solution, designed to check for
VOCs.

TB-2

A soil test boring in the yard area where batteries
were stored on pallets, designed to check for heavy
metals in the soil.

TB-3,4,
5,6,7

Soil test borings designed to check for the presence
of heavy metals and VOCs generally in the yard. Two
of these borings were additionally tested for PCBs.
14

88K23

Logs for each boring are presented in Appendix A. Appendix B
contains photographs of the boring locations, with the
exception of the location of HB-1, which was not accessible at
the time photographs were being taken. A hand-powered auger
was used to drill borings HB-1 and HB-2, and grab samples
consisted of cuttings taken from corresponding depths.
Borings TB-1 through TB-7 were drilled using a hollowstem
auger drilling rig, and samples were taken using a split-spoon
sampler.
Soil borings were sampled for heavy metals, VOCs, and PCBs as
appropriate. Samples consisting of 1.5 feet of undisturbed
core were generally taken at starting depths of 2.5 feet, 5.0
feet, 7.5 feet, and 10 feet. All soil samples were fieldcharacterized for VOCs using a photo-ionization detector.
Samples indicating a hydrocarbon concentration greater than 10
parts per million were always submitted for analysis.
A total of five (5) soil samples were taken for PCB analysis.
Two of the five samples were taken from near-surface borehole
cuttings. The other three samples were taken as surface grab
samples from randomly-chosen discolored areas of soil.
5.3

Field Procedures

Soil sampling procedures conformed to ASTM methods, where
appropriate. Samples were handled and transported in
accordance with EPA/WDNR protocol, including chain-of-custody
procedures, to Foth & Van Dyke's state-certified laboratory
for analysis. All samples were refrigerated from the time of
collection to the time of analysis.
Soil sampling equipment was washed in TSP-type detergent and
rinsed with both de-ionized water and methanol between each
sample in order to minimize cross-contamination. Soil augers
were washed in detergent and rinsed with de-ionized water
between each boring.

15

88K23

5.4

Asbestos Survey

A preliminary survey for the presence of asbestos was
performed by a firm which specializes in this service. The
results of this survey have been presented in a separate
report, entitled Asbestos Inspection Report for Kenosha Iron &
Metal Company. 5512/5514 19th Avenue. Kenosha. Wisconsin, by
Carnow, Conibear & Associates, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois.

16

88K23

6.0

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

1.l

General

The results of analytical testing for all samples are given in
Appendices C through E. Appendix C presents heavy metal
analyses; Appendix D presents analyses for Priority Pollutant
VOCs; and Appendix E presents the results of PCB analyses.
Appendix F contains copies of the chain-of-custody records for
the samples listed in Appendices C through E.
Borehole locations for the samples, plus the locations of each
of the three surface grab samples for PCBs, are shown in
Figure No. 2.
6.2

Summary cJ Analyses - Heavy Metals

A total of twenty (20) soil samples from eight borings were
analyzed for lead, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic. Specific
boreholes and depths analyzed are as follows:
HB-2

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-1

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-2

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-3

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-4

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-5

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-6

2 .5'

5. 0

TB-7

2 .5'

5. 0

7.5'

10.0'
10.O7
10.0'

Analyses stated in Appendix C are reported in micrograms per
gram dry weight (equivalent to parts per million).
Lead is the primary heavy metal for which samples returned
values of toxic concern. Two samples, TB-4(2.5') and TB6(2.5'), contain 1,400 ppm and 2,900 ppm of lead,
respectively. The existence of these values suggests that
levels of lead in soils may, in certain areas of the property,
17

88K23

exceed RCRA levels of toxicity. The volume of soil containing
high lead values cannot be calculated from existing sampling
data.
Maximum values reported for cadmium, chromium, and arsenic in
soil samples are as follows:
Cadmium
Chromium
Arsenic

14 ppm
63 ppm
11 ppm

TB-6(2.5')
TB-2(2.5/)
TB-5(5.0')

Based upon these data, there is a slight possibility that
cadmium and chromium may be present in the soils in excess of
RCRA levels of toxicity. Arsenic values present in these
samples do not suggest exceedance of RCRA toxicity.
6.3

Summary of Analyses - Priority Pollutant VOCs

Nine soil samples from five of the borings were sampled for
VOCs based on field screening with a photoionization detector
or on visual and/or olfactory evidence of potential VOC
contamination. The laboratory report sheets are shown in
Appendix D.
Three samples were taken from hand boring HB-1 located
adjacent to the underground diesel fuel storage tank located
at on the property. The sample at five feet showed no VOCs.
The sample at five and one-half feet, on the other hand,
showed minor amounts of ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes,
which are typically found in hydrocarbon fuels. The sample at
7.0 feet showed benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes,
all typical of fuels, and additionally showed very small
amounts of chloroform and dichlorobromomethane. The source of
these latter two compounds is unknown, but they do not suggest
major problems in such small amounts as are reported.
Two samples were taken from boring TB-1, in the southeast
corner of the property where several drums containing "resin
18

88K23

solution" had been overturned. The sample at five feet showed
520 parts per billion of methylene chloride and 4.2 parts per
billion of 1,1,1-trichloroethane, while the sample at seven
and one-half feet contained 390 parts per billion of methylene
chloride only. These amounts in soils do not suggest
significant environmental liability.
Two VOC samples were taken from boring TB-3, and the one at
five feet shows some small amounts of ethylbenzene, toluene,
and xylenes, but nothing to suggest environmental liability.
The sample from ten feet shows no detectable levels of VOCs.
Two VOC samples were taken from boring TB-6. No detectable
levels of VOCs were reported from the one foot sample, and
only 2900 parts per billion of toluene were .reported in the
two and one-half foot sample.
In general, levels of VOCs in the samples taken from the yard
suggest that there is little problem with these substances in
soils on this property. Ground water beneath the site was not
tested as part of the Phase II study.
6.4

Summary of Analyses - PCBs

Five samples were collected and analyzed for PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) as part of the Phase II study of this
property. Three of the samples were taken from'areas of
discolored (oily-looking) soils at the surface. Two
additional samples were taken from depths of one foot and two
and one-half feet, respectively, from oily soils in borings.
Results of analyses are presented in Appendix E.
PCBs were found to be present in soils at the site. PCBs are
known carcinogens (cancer-causing) and are toxic substances.
Four of the five samples were found to contain detectable
levels of PCBs. The four amounts detected were 14.5, 48, 60,
and 102 parts per million.

19

88K23

The Foth & Van Dyke Analytical Laboratory reports that the
specific PCBs involved are Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254.
These are heavily chlorinated varieties of PCBs which are
indicative of electrical transformer cooling and insulating
oils.
Harold Federman, the property owner/operator, stated to a
representative of Foth & Van Dyke that he did not accept
electrical transformers of this type. Unfortunately, we have
no information concerning the policies of previous owners of
the site. The property has been used as a scrapyard for at
least 40 years, and PCBs are very persistent. There is,
therefore, a high probability that transformers were received
and worked with at this property at some time in the past.
Ordinarily, if oil containing PCBs is spilled on the surface,
the PCBs do not penetrate more than a few inches due to the
high affinity of PCBs for soil particles. One of the samples
came from approximately 2.5 feet in depth, and still contained
48 parts per million of PCBs at this depth. This suggests
repeated spills or one rather large spill in that specific
area.

20

88K23

7.0

CONCLUSIONS

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been found to be present
in soils at the Kenosha Iron & Metal Co., Inc. property.
PCBs
are toxic substances and are carcinogens (cancer-causing).
Four out of five samples tested positive for PCBs, and two of
the four were reported by the Foth & Van Dyke Analytical
Laboratory to contain levels of PCBs in excess of 50 parts per
million (ppm). It is highly probable that amounts of PCBbearing materials in excess of 10 pounds (approximately one
gallon) have been spilled on this site.
According to the Federal Superfund law (CERCLA - Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act), this
spill site must be reported to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) by the owner of the property.
Additionally, remediation of the property must be undertaken.
Remediation of the property would take place as defined under
the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) under the supervision
of the EPA. A failure on the part of the owner to notify the
EPA could mean up to three (3) years imprisonment or a
$10,000 fine.
At this point, the total amount of soil containing PCBs on the
property is not known. Before any remediation of PCB's on the
site can be begun, the Environmental Protection Agency will
require a sampling program on the site sufficient to quantify
the problem.
Heavy metals were also found in the soils sampled in the yard.
Analyses were performed for lead, cadmium, chromium, and
arsenic. Of these, lead is of primary concern, as levels of
up to 2,900 ppm were reported by the analytical laboratory.
Present data suggest that levels of lead in the soil may, in
certain areas of the property, exceed levels of toxicity set
by the Resource Recovery and Control Act (RCRA). If this is
the case, the site would have to be remediated with respect to
lead according to RCRA guidelines before any use or
21

88K23

development of the property could take place. There is also a
smaller possibility of cadmium and chromium contamination.
Asbestos fibers were reported by Carnow, Conibear and
Associates, Ltd., to be present in insulative materials
discarded in the yard and in roofing materials used for the
buildings on the site. There is also, presumably, a high
potential for asbestos fibers to be present in the yard soils.
The site would have to be remediated with respect to asbestos
according to TSCA guidelines before any use or development of
the property could take place.
The presence of asbestos in the soil could have a limiting
effect on cleanup procedures at this site. Normally, PCBs are
either incinerated at high temperatures or disposed of at
hazardous waste landfills which will accept them. If asbestos
are present, incineration may not be an option, due to the
problem of exhaust stack release of asbestos fibers.
Foth & Van Dyke has been informed by Mr. Harold Federman that
a contractor has been hired to remove "everything" from the
property except the aluminum fence and the pile of scrap wire.
The photographs included in the Carnow, Conibear report
clearly show that, in some locations,
asbestos-bearing
materials were included within existing piles of scrap metals.
If all metals have been removed from the yard, there is a
significant possibility that some asbestos-bearing materials
have been transported off-site with the metals. If this has
happened, it is a violation of TSCA regulations, and present
and future owners of the property could be held liable for
consequences.
Foth & Van Dyke finds that there is evidence of significant
environmental impairment on the property of Kenosha Iron and
Metal Co., Inc. There is a significant potential financial
liability for the owner of the site. Under Federal law, any
purchaser of this property would assume direct financial
responsibility for remediation of existing environmental
impairments.
22

88K23

8.0

RECOMMENDATIONS

Foth & Van Dyke has developed specific recommendations for
work to be done on the Kenosha Iron & Metal Company site if
the City of Kenosha is still interested in acquiring the
property. The recommended work would be performed to
accomplish the following:
to provide the City of Kenosha with information
concerning the extent and severity of each type of
contamination present on the site.
to provide the information necessary to construct a
work plan and cost estimate for complete remediation
of the site in accordance with all applicable federal,
state, and local laws and regulations.
The following specific work tasks are recommended by Foth &
Van Dyke:
A grid survey for PCBs should be performed, with
horizontal sampling intervals of no less than 25 feet.
This would result in approximately 45 to 50 borings of
five foot depth each. Each boring would be sampled
and analyzed at depths of 1 foot, 2.5 feet, and 5
feet. This type of grid survey is considered
necessary by the Environmental Protection Agency for
"old spills" where the location or extent of the PCBbearing spill(s) is not known. Remedial efforts are
then guided by the results of the survey.
Extraction Procedure Toxicity (EPTOX) tests should be
run on selected soil samples obtained during the Phase
II study, in order to determine whether soils present
in the yard exceed RCRA levels of toxicity for heavy
metals. If existing soil samples do exceed toxicity
limits, heavy metals should be included in the grid
sampling program in addition to PCBs.
The amount of asbestos present in the yard soils can
best be determined by grid sampling based on the grid
points established by the PCB survey. This should be
supplemented by sampling of all materials within the
yard which may contain asbestos.
23

88K23

Fotn & Van Dyke L A s s o c i a t e s ,

Inc.

(assumed)

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: H B - 1

SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:
MSL
ELEV
622.0

City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority
Kenosha ron & Metal Co.
B8K23
Inside bldg, SU corner

DEPTH FR|SAMP DEPTH]
LND SURF I I N T E R V A L ITYPE

*

N

REC|
(ft)

|

--0
.

618.0

616.0

6U.O

--2
--4
--6
--B

2.5-2.75

DATE: July 8, 1958

ICLASSI

|0-3" concrete
|mg SAND w/clay binder,
|yellw-brn, s. moist; 2" thick black
layer below concrete.

.

620.0

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

BORING DEPTH: 7.0 feet

LABORATORY
TESTS

D R I L L I N G AND
SAMPLING NOTES

(head tests except
as noted

SC

GRB|2.5|

a2.5'.T]P=1.3ppm

ft

5.0-5.5
5.5-6.0

GRB 5ftj
GRBJ5.5
|ft

6.75-7.0

GRB 7ft __

mg SAND, yel-brn u/irreg masses of
dk brn to dk gray SAND, moist.

SP

wet SAND
ICLAY. It gray, plastic, s t i f f .
7.0'-End of Boring. Bit refusal.

CL

| strong odor, not
jappar. diesel fuel
135.0', TIP=U7ppm
ja5.5',TIP=468ppm

'
a6.5',TIP=692ppm
on wet cuttings

I
612.0

.
--10
•

610.0

--12

608.0

--14
.
-

606.0

--16

604.0

.
--18

I
I

.
602.0

--20

600.0

--22

1

I D R I L L I N G DATA

UATFR 1 FVEl

START DATE: July 8. 1988
COMPLETION DATE: July 8, 1988
LOGGED BY: BHB

DRILLING METHOD: Hand Augered
D R I L L I N G CONTRACTOR: Foth & Van Dyke

INFORMATION

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:

CAVE IN DEPTH:
D R I L L I N G LOSSES:

Foth & Van Dyke & A s s o c i a t e s ,

Inc.

(assuned)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

LOG OF TEST BORING MO.: HB-2

CLIENT: City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority

I
BORING DEPTH: 5.25 feet

PROJECT: Kenosha Iron £ Hetat Co.
PROJECT NUMBER: 8SK23
LOCATION: Interior wooden shed
HSL
ELEV
622.0

DEPTH FR|SAMP DEPTH|
WD SURFl INTERVAL ITYPE

it

N

REC
Kft)

DATE: July 8, 1988

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

It brn, S1LTY SAND, w wood chips,
misc debris: mo to fq. dry.
ye 1 -brn SAND, mg, slightly moist,
loose

--0
.
.
.

j
CLASS!
SM |

LABORATORY
TESTS

D R I L L I N G AND
SAMPLING NC^ES
JF1LL

SP |

620.0 --2

.
.
618.0

2.5-2.75

32. 5', TIP= 0 ppm

GRB 2.5
ft

yel-tan SAND, mg to fg, slightly

--4
.
.
-

SP

moist, loose; slight clay 3 5'.
4.75-5.25

25', TIP= 1.7ppm

GRB 5ft

no odor observed

5.25'-End of Boring

616.0

-•6

6i;~o

--B

612.0

--10

610.0

--12

608.0 --H

l
606.0

--16

604.0

--18

602.0

--20

600.0

--22

D R I L L I N G DATA

WATER LEVEL INFORMATION

START DATE: July 8, 1988
COMPLETION DATE: July 8, 1988
LOGGED BY: BHB

DRILLING METHOD: Hand Augered
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Foth £ Van Dyke

|

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:

CAVE IN DEPTH:
DRILLING LOSSES:

Foth & Van Dyke I A s s o c i a t e s ,

Inc.

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: T B - 1

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:

HSL IDEPTH FR
FLEV ILND SURF

City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority
Kenosha Iron & Metal Co.
88K23
SE corner of yard

SAMP DEPTH
I N T E R V A L TYPE

*

REC|
N |(ft)

|dk brn to dk gray, mg SAND u/<10S
(gravel; feels "greasy". Contains
jbits of ceramics and probable coal

622.0 --0
.
620.0

616.0

DATE: July 8, 1988

ICLASSI

LABORATORY
TESTS

SP

D R I L L I N G AND
S A M P L I N G NOTES

TIP = 3.0 ppm on
loose cuttings

_
--2

(headspace tests)

61S.O

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

BORING DEPTH: 12 feet

TIP = 0 ppm

2.5-4

SS

18

3 3', color change to It yel-brn

5-7

SS

36

gray to brn mg to fg SILTY SAND
contains bits of probable coal

SM

yel-brn eg to mg SAND u/gravel,
moist

SP

yel-brn CLAYEY SAND, mg, u -

SL

mcd gray, CLAY w/tnixed rounded and
sharp gravel; prob glacial orig.
very stiff, moist.

CL

- -4

-

--6
-.

7.5-9.5

--8
.
.
612.0 --10

SS 4T

TIP = 3 ppm

-

614.0

610.0

10-12

SS

TIP = 0 ppm

64

--12
|12.0'-End of Boring

608.0

--14

606.0 --16
1
1
1
| 604.0 --18

602.0

-•20

600.0

--22

D R I L L I N G DATA

|

UATER LEVEL INFORMATION

START DATE: July 8, 198S
COMPLETION DATE: July 8. 1988
LOGGED BY: BHB
DRILLING METHOD: HSA, 4-1/2" ID
D R I L L I N G CONTRACTOR: Wisconsin Test D r i l l i n g ,

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
Inc.

D R I L L I N G LOSSES:

Foth I Van Dyke t Associates.

Inc.

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

LOG OF TEST BORIMG NO.: TB-2
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:
DEPTH FR
MSL
ELEV LND SURF
622.0 --0
.
620.0

618.0

616.0

City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority
Kenosha Iron £ Metal Co.
88K23
Battery storage site in yard

SAMP DEPTH | |
INTERVAL ITYPE *

N

REC
Uft)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

|dK brn, mg SAND w/slight amt s i l t
ainder, trace gravel, dry.
3 0.5', color change to ye 1 -brn

--2
--

2.5-4.5

-•4
--6

5-7

SS

ss

BORING DEPTH: 12 feet
DATE: July 8, 1988
|
ICLASSI

LABORATORY
TESTS

SP

|(headspace tests)

2.5 33
ft

5ft 39

D R I L L I N G AND
SAMPLING NOTES

| T I P = 0 ppm
med gray, mg to fg SAND, wet;
grades finer down-section.
med gray CLAY u/trace coarse sand
and gravel, very stiff, gravel is
part rounded, part jagged, prob
glacial origin, si ightly moist

SP
CL

TIP = 0 ppm

•
-

6U.O

--8
i
I

612.0

--10

SS

10-12

-

10 98
ft

310', dry to slightly moist

TIP = 0 ppm

.
610.0

--12
.

608.0

--14

606.0

--16

604.0

--18

602.0

--20

600.0

--22

12.0-End of Boring

I

D R I L L I N G DATA

START DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLING METHOD:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

|
I

UATFR IEVFI

July 8, 1988
July 8, 1988
BHB
HSA, 4-1/2" ID
Wisconsin Test Drilling, Inc.

INFORMATinu

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
DRILLING LOSSES:

Foth t Van Dyke & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc.

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: TB-3

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:

City of Kenosha/Redevel opment Authority
Kenosha Iron & Metal Co.
B8K23
South side yard between scrap piles.

" MSL (DEPTH FR|SAMP DEPTH
ELEV 1LND SURF INTERVAL ITYPEl *
622.0

--0

620.0

--2

2.5-4.5

618.0

ss

REC|
N l{*t)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

2.5 10
ft

--4
5-7

ss

5ft 12

gray-green fg SAND w/incl of the
above die pray sand. Moist
roed gray CLAY, moist, firm, small
amt mg sand.

SP

SP
CL

LABORATORY
TESTS

DRILLING AND
SAMOLING NOTES
(heaaspace tests)

[TIP = 2.8 ppm

g-ay-green fq SAND, wet
med gray CLAY w/ pebbles (smooth,
rounded), v. moist to wet

6K.O

--8

38', clay cuttings are gray-grn,
s l i g h t l y moist, trace sand &
pebbles.

612.0

--10

610.0

--12

10
ft

ICLASSl
SP

--6

ss

DATE: July 8, 1988

d* gray mg to fg SAND w/clay binder, slightly "greasy" feel, moist

616.0

10-12

BORING DEPTH: 12 feet

CL

[TIP = 9.1 ppm

|T IP = 0 ppm

163

gray-grn, fg SAND, s. moist, v. dense

SP

'2.0' -End of Boring
608.0

--H

606.0

--16

60A.O

--18

602.0

--20

600.0

--22

(DRILLING DATA

START DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLING METHOD:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

WATER LEVEL

July 8, 19S8
July 8, 19B8
BHB
HSA, 4-1/2" ID
Wisconsin Test Dri lino. Inc.

INFORMATION

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
D R I L L I N G in^rs-

Fotn & Van Dyke i A s s o c i a t e s ,

Inc.

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: TB-4
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:

City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority
Kenosha Iron & Metal Co.
88K23
Between scrap wire and scrap a I in i nun piles

' HSL (DEPTH FR|SAMP DEPTH | I
ELEV JLND SURFl INTERVAL TYPE!
622.0 --0

a 1 foot

.
620.0 --2
.
618.0 --4

2.5-4.5

-

5-7

616.0

--6

6U.O

--8

612.0

--10

GRB

SS

ss

#

REC
N Kft)

1ft

BORING DEPTH: 7.0 feet
DATE: July 8, 1988
LABORATORY

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

|brn S1LTY SAND w/scrao wood, metal
dk gray, mg to eg SAND w/s light
prob clay matrix; feels "greasy";
loose.

CLASS I

TESTS

SM
SP

D R I L L I N G AND

i SAMPLING NOTE?
sampled cuttings
for PCB's. TIP =
0.8 ppm

2.5 22
ft

(headspace tests)

gray-green CLAY u/yel-brn
inclusions or alterations, small
pebbles, moist.
5ft 26

TIP = 0 ppm

S 5 feet, slightly moist

7.0' -End of Boring

610.0 --12

608.0

--14

606.0

--16

604.0 J - - 1 8

602.0

--20

600.0

--22

DRILLING DATA

START DATE: July 8, 1988
COMPLETION DATE: July 8, 1988
LOGGED BY: BHB
DRILLING METHOD: HSA, 4-1/2" ID
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Wisconsin Test Drilling, Inc.

UATER LEVEL INFORMATION

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
D R I L L I N G LOSSES:

I Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: TB-5
|

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

CLIENT: City of Kenosha/Redevelopment Authority

PROJECT: Kenosha Iron & Metal Co.
PROJECT NUMBER: 88K23
LOCATION: In front of crusher/baler building
MSL
IDEPTH FR|SAMP DEPTH]
ELFVjIMD SURFI INTERVAL |TYPE| * 1 N

REC
(ft)1

622.0 --0

62C.O

DATE: July 8, 1988

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L
ICLASSl
brn-qrey SILTY SAND w/metal scraps
SM

dk gray CLAYEY SAND, plastic, mg
sand, med dense, moist

LABORATORY
TESTS

D R I L L I N G AND
S A M P L I N G NOTES

1

(headspace tests)

SC

--2

2.5-4.5

618.0

BORING DEPTH: 12.0 feet

SS 2.5 14
ft

TIP = 0 ppm

2 3', med gray, less clay
3 3. 5', wood & coal frags • FILL
dk gray-grn SAND u/clay binder,
moist, loose.

--4
5-7

616.0

--6

6H.O

--8

ss

IFILL to 3.5'
SP

5ft 24

TIP = 2.4 pp<n
gray-grn CLAY w/ pebbles of fg
red material, moist, firm

CL

I
drier

612.0

--10

610.0

--12

10-12

SS

10 124

gray-grn SILTY CLAY, firm, s. moist

CL

| TIP = 0 ppm

12.0-End of Boring
608.0 --14

1
i

.
606.0

:
I

--16
*

t

604.0 --18

602.0 --20

I
600.0

--22

DRILLING DATA
START DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
LOGGED BY:
D R I L L I N G METHOD:
D R I L L I N G CONTRACTOR:

WATER LEVEL INFORMATION
July 8, 1988
July 8. 1988
BHB
HSA, 4-1/2" ID
Wisconsin Test Dri ling. Inc.

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
D R I L L I N G LOSSES:

Foth £ Van Dyke £ A s s o c i a t e s , Inc.

(assumed)

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.: TB-6

SJRFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:

City of Kenosha/Redeveloproent Authority
Kenosha Iron £ Metal Co.
B8K23
Southwest corner of yard

SAMP DEPTH |
INTERVAL ITYPE

MSI
IDEPTH FR|
ELEV 1LNO SURF

--0
.
.
620.0 --2
.
-

*

N

622.0

618.0

1-2

GRB 1ft

2.5-4.5

SS |2.5

616.0

--6

6H.O

--8

612.0

--10

I't

ICLASSl

LABORATORY
TESTS

D R I L L I N G AND
[_ SAMPLING NOTE1;

|brn SILT1 SAND u/metal ,uood, glass,
ceramics
|dk gray CLAYEY SAND, mg to eg sand
moist, loose, "greasy", incl metal
shavings

SM

(heaaspace tes:s)

SC {Sampled for
PVCs

Pungent organic
ooor. TIP = 0 ppm

|gray-green SAND, moist, fg.
pungent odor, oily residue on
sampler; cutting oil?

SP

j
1
J T 1 P = 0 ppm

5-7

SS

5ft|U

gray-green CLAY w/pebbles, stiff,
small amt oily residue observed
on pebble faces, slight odor

10-12

SS

10 |111

310', no oily residue, no odor obs

610.0

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

DATE: July 8, 1988

20

--4

•

REC|
(ft)l

BORING DEPTH: 12. C feet

CL

(TIP = 0 ppm

TIP - 0 ppm

gray-green, fg SAND, s. moist

--12
12.0'-End of Boring
m

608.0

--H

606.0

--16

604.0

--18

602.0

--20

I
I

i1

.

600.0

--22

DRILLING DATA

START DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLING METHOD:
D R I L L I N G CONTRACTOR:

UATFR I FVTI

July 8, 1988
July 8, 1988
BHB
HSA, 4-1/2" ID
Wisconsin Test D r i l l i n g , Inc.

lUFDRMATinu

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
DRILLING LOSSES:

F o t n & van Dyke £ A s s o c i a t e s ,

LOG OF TEST BORING NO.:

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:

616.0

--6

614.0

--a

612.0

--10

610.0

--•.2

608.0

--H

606.0

•-16

604.0

--18

632.0

--20
r
|
I

(assumed)
SURFACE ELEVATION: 622.00

TB-7

City of Kenosha/Redevelopment
Kenosha Iron & Metal Co.
B8K23
Northwest corner of yard

MSL IDEPTH FR| SAMP DEPTH|
ELEV ILND SURF INTERVAL (TYPE
622.0 --0
.
.
1620.0 |--2
.
618.0 -•i,
~

Inc.

*

REC|
N |(ft)

|

Authority

DESCRIPTION OF M A T E R I A L

BORING DEPTH: 7.0 feet
DATE: July 8, 1988

|CLASS|

brn SILTY SAND w/scrap wood, metal

LABORATORY
TESTS

D R I L L I N G AND
S A M P L I N G NOTES

SM

Cuttings, wi re.

dK gray SILTY SAND, s. moist,
loose, mg to eg.
2.5-4.5

SM

SS |2.5|21

|

|yel-grn SAND, tug, moist, loose
|yel-grn CLAY w/pebbles, firm.
s. moist, pebbles rounded (glacial)
5-7

| TIP = 0 ppm

ft

ss

SP
CL

5ft 36

|T IP = 0 ppm

7.0' -End of Boring

600.0 --22
[DRILLING DATA
START DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLING HETHCO:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

!
UATFB i FVFi i wFnpMAT i nw
July 8, 1938
July 8, 1988
BHB
HSA, 4-1/2" ID
Wisconsin Test D r i l l ing. Inc.

DEPTH AT COMPLETION: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH: None observed
LATER TIME/DEPTH:
CAVE IN DEPTH:
DRILLING LOSSES:

APPENDIX B
Photographs of Boring Locations

Photograph No. 7

Site of Boring TB-6

Photograph No. 8

Site of Boring TB-'

Photograph No. 5

Photograph No. 6

Site of Boring TB-4

Site of Boring TB-5

Photograph No. 3

Site of Boring TB-2

Photograph No. 4

Site of Boring TB-3

Photograph No. 1

Photograph No. 2

Site of Boring HB-2

Site of Boring TB-1

APPENDIX C
Analytical Results, Heavy Metals

PQTH AND VAN DYKE
Engineers/Archi tec ts
2737 S. Ridge Road
P.O. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wise. 54307-9012

W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

Keno sha Dept o-f City Dev.

Client
Address

Name o-f Rep.
Telephone No.

(000 > 000-0000

Sample I . D.

HB-2
2.5'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

Date Col lected
Date deceived
ar
*^a3Filer
m cau4~
iD o
cror K*
3 cf

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

HB-2
5.0'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

i i nV.X=r
^* c.
mn-JL

TB-1
2.5'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

52

<

43

0.5

<

76

0.5

1 .3

Cr, ug/g

9.4

7.8

7.7

As, ug/g

2.4

2.7

3.0

comments:

TB-1
5.0'
7/8/ 88
7/11 /88

130

2 .3
12

6.0

Results reported as ug/g dry weight

Signed

TB-1
7 .5'
7/8/88
7/11/88

rXeSU i L s

Pb, ug/g
Cd, ug/g

Sampl ed By
BHB
Scope I .D.
8BK23
Bil ling Line No .
Liaison
B. Burton
Supply Order No .
Result Sheet No
38247.01

:

SV

-J 7 •

k-^ CXjL^t JL A

( I JAAAJ

Date

16

< 0.5
12

7.8

AND VAN DYKE
Engineers/Architects
2737 S. Ridge Road

LABORATORY A N A L Y S I S RESULTS

P.O. Box 19012

W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

Green Bay, Wise. 54307-9012

Keno sha Dept of City Dev .

Client
Address

Name o-f Rep.
Telephone No.

< 000 ) OOO-OOOO
TB-1
10.0'
7/8/88
7/1 1 /88

Sample I . D.
Date Col lected
Date Received
Parameters^

units

19

< 0.5
17

Cr, ug/g

9.0

As , ug/g

comments:

TB-2
5.0'
7/8/BB
7/11/88

T B-2
1 0.0'
7 /B/8B
7 /I 1 /B8

TB-3
2.5'
7/8/88
7/1 1 /SB

Resu Its

Pb, ug/g

C d , ug/g

TB-2
2.5'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

Sampled By
BHB
Scope I . D .
88K23
B i l l ing Line No. 3
Liaison
B. Burton
Supply Order No. 2
Result Sheet No.
36247.02

15

18

2.5

2.3
63

61

6.9

9.0

.3

< 0 .5
13

8.3

300

3.1
14

6.9

Results reported as ug/g dry weight

Signed:

ilf

Date:

I,

FGTH AND VAN DYKE
Engineers/Architects
2737 5. Ridge Road
P.O. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wise. 54307-9012

Name o-f Rep.
Telephone No.

(000)

000-0000
TB-3
5.0'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

Sampl e I . D .
Date Collected

Date Received
p o^r r~
t*~ c.
l
o n^i tmrf*
L t+•
r ro -^
f LIin ii4-r^= i

—

Pb, ug/g

< 0.5
14

As, ug/g

TB-3
10.0'
7/B/88
7/1 1/88

Sampl ed By
BHB
Scope I .D.
B8K23
Bil ling Line No. 3
Liaison
B. Burton
Suppl y Order No. 2
Result Sheet No.
38247.03
TB-4
2.5'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

5.4

TB-4
5.0'
7/8/B B
7/1 I/ 88

.18

< 0.5
13

7.5

1400
6.0
210
10

18

< 0.5
15
9. 0

Results reported as ug/g dry weight.

Signed:

TB-5
2.5'
7/8/B8
7/11/88

s

—

59

Cr , ug/g

comments:

W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

Kenosha Dept o-F City Dev.

Client
Address

Cd , ug/g

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

-j

Date:

ji£?

0

100

0.8
12

5.4

FDTH AND VAN DYKE
Engineers/Architects

LABORATORY

2737 S. R i d g e Road
P.O. Box 19012
Green B a y , Wise. 54307-9012

W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev .

Cl lent

Address

Name o-f Rep.
Tel ephone No .

Sampl e I . D .

Date Col lected
Date Received

(000) 000-0000

TB-5
5.0'

A N A L Y S I S RESULTS

TB-6
2.5'

7/8/88

7/8/88

7/1 1/88

7/1 1 /SB

Sampl ed By
Scope I .D.
Bi 1 1 ing Line No .
Liaison
Supp 1 y Order No.
Resul t Sheet No.

TE-6
5.0'
7/8/88
7/1 1/88

.
Parameters, uni

TB-7
2.5'
7/8/8 8
7/1 I/ 88

*-\
A.

36247.04

TB-7

5.0'
7/8/88

7/11/88

s

Pb , ug/g

19

Cd , ug/g

< 0.5

14

Cr , ug /g

16

53

As , ug /g

11

comments:

BHB

88K23
3
B. Burton

24

2900

<

0.5
15

3.9

6.0

20

< 0. 5
14
6. 0

Results reported as ug/g dry weight

Signed:

Date:

18

< 0.5
15
9.0

APPENDIX D
Analytical Results, Volatile Organic Compounds

A N £ _ Y S I S RESUL

FCTH AND VAN DYKE
2737 5. R i d g e Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012

C l i e n t : Kenosha
Address:

Samole ID: HB-1 5.0'
Date C o l l e c t e d : 7/B/B8
Date Received: 7/11/B8
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *:
3B338.06
Scope: BSK23
3.L
S.O

Dept of City Dev

Attn.:

P R I O R I T Y POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS

PARAMETER
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromome thane
Carbon tetrac hi or ide
Chi orobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethy1viny 1 ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Di bromoc h 1 orome thane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dich 1 oroben zene
Die hiorobromomethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichlorotheyiene
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-cis-Dich1oropropene
1,3-trans—Dieh1oropropene
Ethylbenzene
r-iethylene c h l o r i d e
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
V i n y l Chloride
Xylenes

..
-

CONCENTRATION
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 4.0
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 6.0

Comments:

Signed

T

Date:

UNITS
ug /kg
ug / kg
ug / kg
ug / kg
ug/kg
ug / kg
ug /kg
ug/ kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/ kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug / kg
ug / kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

weight
we ig ht
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weig ht
weig ht
weig ht
weig ht
weig ht
we ig ht
weig ht
weight
weight
we ig ht
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weig ht
weight

AND VAN DYKE
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012
Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Sample ID: HB-1 5.5'
Date Collected: 7/8/BB
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet «:
38338.07
Scope: 88K23
B.L.: 3
S O

PRIORITY POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
Benzene
Promo-form
omomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethy1 vinyl ether ..
Chloro-form
Cnloromethane
Dibromoch1oromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Dich1orobromomethane
I , 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
,
1 , 1-Dichlorotheylene
,
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
2-Dichloropropane
,
-,3-cis-Dichloropropene ..,
1,3-trans-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
hethylene chloride
,
1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane ,
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 , l-Trichloroeth«ne . . ..
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane . .. .
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes

CONCENTRATION
10
10
5,,0
5,,0
5,,0
5,,0
20
10
5.
10
10
10
10
10
5.,0
5.,0
10
10
10
10
10
2100
< 10
< 10
< 10
890
<
5,,0
< 5,,0
< 10
<
5.0
27,000

UNITS
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight

Comments:

Sign.ed :

Date

°T

^ I. 19??

;TQTH AND

VAN

G'/k'E

LABORATORY A N A L Y S I S RESULTS

2737 S. R i d g e Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9O12

C l i e n t : Kenosha
Address:

Dept o-f City Dev

Attn . :

Sample ID: HB-1
7.0'
Date Collected: 7/8/BS
Date Received: 7/11/8B
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet ** :
3833B.08
Scope: 8BK23
S.O
B.L

PRIORITY POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID

PARAMETER
Benzene
Bromororm
Bromomethane
,
Carbon tetrach1oride ....
Ch1orobenzene
,
Chloroethane
,
2-Chloroethy1 vinyl ether
Chloro-form
Chioromethane
Dibromochloromethane . . .
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
....
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
....
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ....
Dieh1orobromomethane . . .
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1-Dichlorothey1ene . . .
1,2-trans-Dichloroethy1ene
1,2-Dich1oropropane
1 ,3-cis-Dichloropropene
..
1,3-trans-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
1,2,2-Tetrach1oroethane
ietrach1oroethylene .,
To 1uene
,
1,1,1-Trich1oroethane
1,1,2-Trich1oroethane
Trichioroethy 1ene . . .
V i n y l Chloride
Xy1enes
,

CONCENTRATION
1 100
< 10
< 5 .0
< 5 .0
< 5 .o
< 5 .0
< 20
79
< 5 0
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
36
< 5 ,0
< 5 ,0
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
2500
< 10
< 10
< 10
11,000
<
5.0
<
5.0
< 10
<
5.0
19,000

ANALYSIS
UNITS
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Tg/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kgug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

Commen ts:

Signed

Date;

/,

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
wei g ht
weight
weig h t
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
wei g h t
weight
weig h t
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weig ht

TOTH AND VAN DYKE

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI
54307-9012
Sample ID: TB-1 5.0'
Date Collected: 7/B/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet K:
38338.09
Scope: B8K23
B.L
S.O

Client: Kenosha Dept of City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

PRIORITY POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS

PARAMETER
Benzene
Bromo-form
: >momethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethy1 vinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromoc h 1 oromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichlorothey1ene
1,2-trans-Dichloroethy1ene
1

2—Diehloropropane

»_,3—ci5—Dieh1oropropene
1,3-trans-Dichloropropene
Ethyl benzene
r"iethy lene chloride
i,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes

CONCENTRATION
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 0.50
< 0.50
< ".50
< 0.50
< 2.0
< 1.0
< 0.50
< 1.0
< 1.0
< l.O
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 0.50
< 0.50
< l.O
< 1.0
<

1.0

< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
520
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
4.2
< 0.50
< 1.0
< 0.50
< 3.0

UNITS
ug/kg
ug/ kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

Comments:

Signed:

Date i

t—T

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight

PQTH AND VAN

L A B O R A T O R Y A N A L Y S I S RESULTS

DYt-'E

2737 S. R i d g e Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 543G7-9G12
Sample ID: TB-1
7.5'
Date C o l l e c t e d : 7/8/B8
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet t* :
3B33B 10
Scope: 88K23
B.L. : 3
5.0

C l i e n t : Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev.
Address:

Attn . :

P R I O R I T Y POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS

PARAMETER

CONCENTRATION

UNITS

Benzene
Bromo-form
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrach1oride
,
Ch 1 oroben zene ....'..'
,
Chloroethane
,
2-Chloroethy1viny1 ether .,
Chloro-form
,
Chloromethane
Dibromoch1oromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene

<
<
<
<

1 .0
1 .0
0 .50
0 .50
< o .50
< 0 .50
< 2 .0
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
390
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 3 .0

ug/ kg
ug/kg
ug/ kg
ug/kg

Dichlorobromomethane

1,1-Dich1oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1-Dieh1orothey 1ene
1,2-trans-Dichloroethy1ene
1,2-Dichioropropane
1,3-cis-Dich1oropropene
..
1,3—trans—Dieh1oropropene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene c h l o r i d e
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrach1oroethy1ene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1—Trieh1oroethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethy1ene . . . ,
V i n y l Chloride
,
Xy1enes
,

ug/kg

ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug / kg
ug/ kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg dry
ug/kg dry
ug/kg dry

Commen ts:

Signed:

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

Date:

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig h t
weig h t
weight
weig h t
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weig h t

PQTH AND VAN DYKE
2737 5. R i d g e Road

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI

54307-9012

Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

Sample ID: TB-3 5.0'
Date Collected: 7/B/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *:
38338.11
Scope: 88K23
B.L.
S.O,

PRIORITY POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
Benzene
P'-omoform
omomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethy1viny1 ether ..
Chloro-form
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
,
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4—Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorobromomethane
,
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
,
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
,
1 , 1-Dichlorotheylene
,
1 , 2-trans-Dichloroethylene
2—Dichloropropane
,
*-, 3—c is —Die h 1 oropropene . . ,
1 , 3-trans-Dichloropropene ,
Ethylbenzene
fiethylene chloride
1 , 1 , 2.2-Tetrachioroethane ,
Tetrach1oroethy1ene
Toluene
,
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ....
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ....
Trichloroethylene
V i n y l Chloride
Xylenes

CONCENTRATION
5
5
2
2
2
2
10
5
2
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
290
< 5
< 5
< 5
150
< 2
< 2
< 5
< 2
2400

UNITS
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug / kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

Comments:

Signed :

Date:

/,

weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight

PQTH AND VAN DYKE
2737 5. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wl
54307-9012

C l i e n t : Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

LABORATORY A N A L Y S I S RESULTS

S a m p l e ID: TB-3 10.0'
Date Collected: 7/8/BB
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *:
38338.12
B.L.
S.O,
Scope: 83K23

P R I O R I T Y POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS

PARAMETER
Benzene
Bromo-form
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
,
Ch1orobenzene
Chloroethane
,
2-Chloroethy1viny1 ether .,
Chloro-form
,
Ch1oromethane
,
Dibromochloromethane
,
1 ,2-Dichiorobenzene
,
1 ,3-Dich1orobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
DiehIorobromomethane
1,i-Dichloroethane
,2-Dich1oroethane
, 1-Dieh1orothey 1ene
,
2-trans-Dichloroethylene
,2 —Dichloropropane
,
'- , 3-c is-Dichl oropropene . . ,
1,3-trans-Dieh1oropropene ,
Ethylbenzene
,
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrach1oroethane
Teirachioroethy1ene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ....
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane .....
Trichloroethy1ene
,
V i n y l Chloride
Xylenes

CONCENTRATION
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 2 .0
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0

UNITS
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug / kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg

< 1 .0

< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0

ug /kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug /kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

< 1 .0
< 1 .0
< 1 .0

< 0 .50
< 0 .50
< 1 .0
< 0 .50
< 3 .0

ug /kg

Commen ts:

Signed:

,.,-J

Date:

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
d ry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

weight
weight
weight
weight
weig ht
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
we ight
weight
weight
weig ht
weight
weig ht
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weig h t
weight
weight
weight
weight
weigh t
weight

PGTH AND VAN DYKE
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012
Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Sample ID: TB-6 1.0'
Date Collected: 7/8/8B
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *:
38338.13
Scope: BBK23
B.L.
S.O

PRIORITY POLLUTANT VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
P nzene
Bromomethane ..............
Carbon tetrachloride ......
Chlorobenzene ..... . .......
Chloroethane ..............
2-Chloroethy 1 vinyl ether ..
Chloro-form
................
Chloromethane .............
Di bromochloromethane ......
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
.......
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
.......
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
.......
D ichl orobromomethane ......
'. , 1 -Dichloroethane
........
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
........
1 , 1-Dichlorothey lene ..... ,
2-trans-Dichl oroethy lene
r, 2-Dichloropropane .......
1 , 3-cis-Dichl oropropene . . ,
1 , 3-trans-Dichl oropropene ,
Ethylbenzene
.............
,
Methylene chloriae ....... ,
1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
,
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ...
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane . . .
Trich1oroethy1ene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes

CONCENTRATION
< 15
< 15
< 7.5
< 7.5
< 7.5
< 7.5
< 30
< 15
< 7.5
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 7.5
< 7.5
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 15
< 7.5
< 7.5
< 15
< 7.5
< 45

Commen ts:

Signed

Date;

UNITS
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

dry weight
dry weight
dry weight

dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight
dry weight

POTH AND

VAN

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

DVK'E

2737 5. R i d g e Road
P. 0. Box 19O12
Green Bay, MI 54307-9012

Client: Kenosha
Address:

Dept of City Dev,

Attn.:
PRIORITY POLLUTANT

PARAMETER
Benzene
Sromo-form
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
ChloVobenzene
.
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethy1 vinyl ether ..
Chloro-form
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorobromomethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
,
1 , 1-Dichlorotheylene
,
i , 2-trans-Dichloroethylene
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
,
1 , 3-cis-Dichloropropene
.. ,
1 , 3-trans-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrach1oroethy1ene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ....
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ....
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes
Comments: High detection

Signed :

Sample ID: TB-6 2.5'
Date Collected: 7/B/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *:
38338.14
Scope: 8BK23
B.L.
S.O,

VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLID ANALYSIS

CONCENTRATION
250
250
120
120
120
120
500
250
120
250
250
250
250
250
120
120
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
2900
< 120
120
250
120
750

UNITS
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg

dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry
dry

limits due to in'

Date:

U-frJUjO

•i /

weight
weight
weight
weight

weigh .
weight
weight
weight

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight

weight
weight

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight
weight

weight
weight
weight
weight
weight

weight

APPENDIX E
Analytical Results, Polychlorinated Biphenyls

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

FOTH AND VAN DYKE
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI
54307-9012
Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn.:

Sample ID: Sur-face 1
Date Collected: 7/8/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet *t:
38338.01
Scope: BBK23
B.L.: 3
S.O.

PCS SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER

CONCENTRATION

UNITS

Aroclor 1016

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1221

< 0.80

mg /kg dry weight

Aroclor 1232

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260

mg /kg dry weight

1 .5

mg /kg dry weight

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

13

mg /kg dry weight

< 1 .6

Commen ts:

Signed :

Date:

,+ (.

8

LABORATORY

FOTH AND VAN DYKE

ANALYSIS RESULTS

2737 5. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wl 54307-9012
Sample ID: Sur-face 2
Date Collected: 7/8/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet K:
38338.02
Scope: 8BK23
B.L.: 3
S.O,

Client: Kenosha Dept of City Dev
Address:

Attn. :

PCS SOLID ANALYSIS
CONCENTRATIlON

UNITS

1016

< 0.80

mg /kg dry weight

1221

< O.BO

mg/kg dry weight

1232

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

PARAMETERR

21

1242

mg/kg dry weight

< 0.80

1248

mg/kg dry weight

39

1254

<

1260

mg/kg dry weight
mg/kg dry weight

1.6

Commen ts;

Signed :

4/
of

Date;

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

AMD VAN DYKE
2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012

Sample ID: Surface 3
Date Collected: 7/8/BB
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet tt: 38338.03
Scope: 88K23
B.L.: 3
S.O,

Client: Kenosha Dept of City Dev,
Address:

Attn.:

PCS SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER

CONCENTRATION

UNITS

Aroclor 1016

<

8.0

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1221

< 8.0

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1232

< 8.0

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1242

< 8.0

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1248

< 8.0

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1254

< 16

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1260

< 16

mg/kg dry weight

Comments: High detection limits due to substantial interferences.
cleanup required.

Signed:

Date:

Extensive

/,

/TO

.ABORATORY

PQTH AND VAN DYKE

ANALYSIS RESULTS

2737 S. Ridge Road
P. 0. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012
Sample ID: TB-4
2.5'
Date Collected: 7/8/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet tt: 38338.04
Scope: 88K23
B.L.: 3
S.O,

Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev,
Address:

Attn.:

PCB SOLID ANALYSIS
PARAMETER

CONCENTRATION

UNITS

Aroclor 1016

< 0 . 80

mo /kg dry weight

Ar-oclor 1221

< 0 . 80

mg /kg dry weight

Aroclor

1232

< 0 . 80

dig /kg dry weight

Aroclor

1242

Aroclor

1248

Aroclor

1254

Aroclor

1260

50

<

mg /kg dry weight

0.80

mg / kg dry weight

52

<

mg /kg dry weight

ma/ka dry weight

1.6

Comrnen ts :

Signed:

T '/i
I L^l/V/W^U

Date :

fl_

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

POTH AND VAN DYKE

2737 S. Ridge Road
P. C. Box 19012
Green Bay, Wl 54307-9012
Sample ID: TB-6 1'
Date Collected: 7/8/88
Date Received: 7/11/88
Sampled By: BHB
Liaison: BHB
Result Sheet #:
38338.05
Scope: 8BK23
B.L.: 3
S.O,

Client: Kenosha Dept o-f City Dev
Address:

Attn . :

PCS SOLID ANALYSIS

PARAMETER

CONCENTRATION

UNITS

Aroclor 1016

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1221

< 0.80

mg/kg dry weight

Aroclor 1232

< O.BO

mg /kg dry weight

1 .0

Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248

< 0.80

Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260

mg /kg dry weight
mg /kg dry weight

mg/kg dry weight

47

<

mg /kg dry weight

1.6

Comments:

Signed:

Date

.(L

APPENDIX F
Chain-of-Custody Records

I <=• I

.„ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJECT NO.

3 •"

PROJECT NAME

NO.
SAMPLERSrJS/gnafure)

STA.
NO.

DATE

TIME

COMP

OF

REMARKS

CONTAINERS

m

a:
U

STATION LOCATION

/ay 5-.

r.*

<-*'/«
x

5.5ff

7.*

HB-l
5.*'

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signat

DATE/TIME

-

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature)

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature)

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (S.gnature)

>—

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature)

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signaiuie)

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY
BY:. (Signature)

DATE/TIME

REMARKS:
.' //I*

~{

'/- ^ " ~ ^ ' r y x~>r ^

PROJECT NO.

OF CUSTODY RECCED

PROJECT NAME

NO.
SAMPLERSrtfjgnafureJ

OF
Q.

STA.
NO.

DATE

TIME

1
u

REMARKS

CONTAINERS
STATION LOCATION

Of

O

I'
st

/v

Tff-7

r.
S-i

XX

,'-/
Sf

RELINQUISHED BY:J5ignay

DATE/TIME

x •/
..-? i
RELINQUISHED BV: (Signature)
DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

7RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (S/gnature;

* ^'' l ~'
RECEIVED BY: (Signature)

"
RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY

DATE/TIME

REMARKS:

(OHM 'MMCfM

li i

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJECT NO.

PROJECT NAME

NO.
SAMPLED: (Signature)

OF
STA.
NO.

DATE

TIME

0.

00

0
u

0

REMARKS

CONTAINERS

2

STATION LOCATION

r,

7Z?-/
-7.5
'X .

[

3-

#

K

N
/r

f

/o.c

P
(

fS

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED BY: (Signature;

RELINQUISHED BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY
BY: (Signature;

DATE/TIME

REMARKS:

(OHM > U M O ( M

I''••«• i

KENOSHA IRON & METAL- Case # 20908- Notes on Inorganic Qualifiers
General Information
This package contains eighteen soil samples (and two duplicate samples) that
were collected for the complete Target Analyte List (TAL) analyses of metals.
Field QC
Sample S02(MEST42) is a field duplicate of sample S01(MEST41) .
Sample S18(MEST58) is a field duplicate of sample S17(MEST57).
Sample S19(MEST59) is a background sample.
Soils
The Matrix Spike Recoveries for Mn, V, and Cd are OX. The Mn, V, and Cd
results for samples S12(MEST52), S13(MEST53), and S15(MEST55) are unusable
(R). Mn, V, and Cd results for the remaining samples are estimated (J) due to
low bias.
The Matrix Spike Recovery for Sb is low outside QC limits. The Continuing
Calibration Blanks contain Sb. The Sb result for sample S18(MEST58) is
estimated (J) due to low bias and interference. The Sb results for the
remaining samples are estimated (UJ) due to possible elevation of the
detection limit.
The serial dilution audits for Cr, Ag, Cu and Zn were flagged (E) by the lab
and are out of control. All Cr, Ag, Cu and Zn data are estimated (J) due to
interference.
The matrix spike recovery for As is low outside QC limits. The A.- result for
sample S20(MEST60) is estimated (UJ) due to possible elevation of the
detection limit. The As results for the remaining samples are estimated (J)
due to low bias.
Se results for samples S03(MEST43) and S16(MEST56) were flagged (E) by the lab
and are estimated (J) due to interference. Se results for samples
S04(MEST44), S08(MEST48), S09(MEST49), SIO(MESTSO), S12(MEST52), S13(MEST53),
S14(MEST54), S17(MEST57), S18(MEST58), and S20(MEST60) were flagged (W) by the
lab. The Se result for S13(MEST53) is estimated (J) due to interference.
The
Se results for the remaining aforementioned samples are estimated (UJ) due to
interference.
The Tl results for samples S11(MEST51) and S17(MEST57) were flagged (E) by the
lab and are estimated (UJ) due to interference.
The relative percent difference in the duplicate analysis for Hg was flagged
(*) by the lab and is out of control. All Hg results are estimated (J) due to
poor precision.

Kenoshe Iron and Metal- Case It 20908

INORGANIC ANALYSIS OF S
Rec'd 9/29/93 by AATS- LA

PAGE 1 OF 4

I
| (LocationTraffic Rpt <| (Location Traffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt *| (Location Traffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt #
||S19
[HEST59
(1 SOI
NEST41
JJS02
MEST43
||S04
HEST44
MEST42
||S03
|| |
|

inu
LUW

Analyte
Aliminum
Ant imony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryl 1 ium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
lhal 1 ium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide

SOIL
|| X Solid BACKGROUND
|| X Solid 2007 55th St. | | X Solid
DUPLICATE
|| X Solid 2001 55th St. (1 X Solid 1933 55th St
CRDL
| | 79.9
jj
89.5
|| 81.8 OF S01
II
83.1
II 77-8
(mg/Kg) ||
| (corrected sample
| (corrected sample
|| corrected
sample
|| corrected
sample
| (corrected sample
| | CRDL
concentration)
|
CRDL
concentration)
| CRDL concentration
concentration) | CRDL
concent rat i on 1 1 CRDL
9080

| | 48

40 (1

50

12 ||

15

2 II
40 ||

3
50

6.1 NJ
67.7

||
||

2
48

0.48 B
1.41 NJ

||
||

1
1

||

1203

1 II

1

1 II
1000 ||

1
1252

2 II
10 ||

3
13

5 ||

6

2.8 UNJ ||

15200

14

18.7 EJ

||

2

5.8 B

||

12

57.9 EJ

||

6

20 ||

25

14300

1 II
1000 ||

1
1252

50.6

||

1

8890

||

1203

||

4

3 ||

4

0.2 ||

0.3

8 ||
1000 ||

10
1252

1 II

1

2 II

3

1000
2
10
4

|| 1252
||
3
||
13
||
5

II

o

318 NJ

| | 24

0.13 U*J ||
0.2
18. 3
||
10
1280
| | 1203
3.8U

||

0.75 UEJ (1
1520

1.0U

||

||

21.4 NJ ||
370 EJ | |

II

1
2
1203

2
12
5

o

4710

||

2.6
6.9
254
0.43
61.6
27200
30.8
5.2
474
25300

UNJ ||
15
NJ ||
2
jj
49
B
||
1
NJ ||
1
|| 1222
EJ ||
2
B ||
12
EJ ||
6
j|
24

49
4320

2.7 UNJ
5.3 SNJ
290
0.38 B
52.0 NJ
29400
39.8 EJ
5.3 B
411 EJ
20600
557
512
||
1
13200
| | 1222 13300
344 NJ ||
4
410 NJ
0.44 *J
0.47 *J ||
0.2
31.7
33.9
||
10
593 B
640 B || 1222
0.72U
||
1
3.9 B
0.73 UEJ
0.72 UEJ ||
2
1320
1340
| | 1222
0.98 U
0.96 U ||
2
14.8 NJ ||
12
14.7 NJ
1490 tJ ||
5
1410 EJ

II

o

||
4
46
5
80
jj
13
2.5 UNJ
4.4 NJ
||
2
| | 45
153
0.33 B
||
1
4.9 NJ
||
1
jl 1117
47300
13.9 EJ
||
2
1.6 B
||
11
147 EJ
|j
6
| | 22 15800
268
||
1
26000
|| 1117
292 NJ
||
3
0.11 U*J
||
0.2
||
9
16.5
728 B
|| 1117
3.4 UEJ
||
1
0.67 UEJ
jl
2
1410
Jl 1117
||
2
0.89 U
13.7 NJ
||
11
599 EJ
||
4

II

o

4620
51
14.1 UNJ
||
3
7.9 SNJ
295
||
51
(1
1
0.65 B
15.7 NJ
||
1
11100
|| 1285
103 EJ
||
3
||
13
5.8 B
511 EJ
||
6
64000
j|
26
1070
||
1
|| 1285
4750 B
385 NJ
11
4
0.45 «J
||
0.3
59.6
jj
10
1730 B
|| 1285
0.77 UUJ
||
1
3.9 UEJ
||
3
2260 B
(I 1285
1.3 B
||
3
22.3 BNJ
||
13
1510 EJ
||
5
||

jj

15

II

o

INORGANIC ANALYSIS OF SOIL
Kenosha Iron and Metal- Case * 20908

1
11

Kec'd 9/29/93 by AATS- LA

PAGE 2 OF A

| (Location (Traffic Rpt 0| (Location (Traffic Rpt #( (Location (Traffic Rpt *| (Location (Traffic Rpt *| (Location (Traffic Rpt 0|
|| SOS

SOIL
CROL

1

JMEST45

||S06

Mercury
Nickel

Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thai I ium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide

JNEST47

JJS08

JMEST48

||S09

JNEST49

••

••

••

•-

••

•—

—

| (corrected) sample
) (corrected) sample
| (corrected) sample
| (corrected)
sample
| (corrected) sample
|| CROL | concent rat ion 1 1 CROL (concentration) | CRDL (concentration] | CROL (concentration] | CRDL
(concentration

Analyte

Manganese

JJS07

|| X Solid (1929 55th St.|| X Solid (1923 55th St.|| X Solid (1913 55th St.|| X Solid (5506 19th Ave|| X Solid |
(I
75.4 j
jj 84.5 |
|| 80.6 j
jj 83.6 j
jj 85.0 j

ting/Kg) ||

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryl 1 ium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
1 ron
Lead
Magnesium

JNEST46

40
12
2
40
1
1

||
||
II
||
II
II

53
16
3
53
1
1

1000 ||

1326

2 II
10 ||

3
13

5 II
20 ||

7
27

1 II
1000 ||

1
1326

3 II
0.2 ||

4
0.3

8 ||
1000 ||

11
1326

1 II
2 II
1000 ||

1
3
1326

2 II
10 ||

3
13

4 ||

5

II

o

4260
11
2.9 UNJ ||
12.7 NJ jj
215
||
1.5
||
4.8 NJ
7600
16.7 EJ
10.0 B
136 EJ
19900
246
1800
235 NJ
0.47 *J
36.6
640 B
0.80 U
0.80 UEJ
1560
1.1 U
19.0 NJ
665 EJ

47
14
2
47
1

||
1
|| 1183
||
2
||
12
||
6
|j
24
||
1
|| 1183
jj
4
||
0.2
||
9
|| 1183
||
1
||
2
I) 1183
||
2
||
12
||
5

II

5930
11
2.6 UNJ ||
11.6 NJ j|
177
||
0.76 B
3.8 NJ
7800
18.3 EJ
8.1 B
89.1 EJ
31800
329
3600
429 NJ
0.15 *J
21.0
777 B
3.6 U
0.71 UEJ
1700
0.95 U
28.9 NJ
671 EJ

50
15
2
50

||
1
|j
1
| | 1241
(I
2
jj
12
jj
6
| | 25
||
1
1241
4
0.2
10
1241
1

2
1241

2
12
5

o

8830
2. 7 UNJ
6.4 NJ
173
0.39 B
2.9 NJ
7530
26.4 EJ

5.4 8
226 EJ
14400
266
4060
331
0.34
16.7
1220
3.7
0.74
1220
0.99
21.8
477

||
jj
14
|j
2
11
48
jj
1
||
1
|j 1196
jj
2

|j
jj
jj
||

|| 1196
NJ jj
4
M ||
0.2
jj
10
B || 1196
U ||
1
UEJ ||
2
B || 1196
U ||
2
NJ ||
12
EJ ||
5

II
===========

12
6
24
1

o

4
5130
8
2.6
8.3
130
0.25
3.4
5610

||
47
UNJ ||
14
NJ jj
2
11
47
B
||
1
NJ ||
1
|| 1176

16.0 EJ
3.3 B
154 EJ
10800

278
2330
183 NJ
0.32 *J
17.1
535 B
3.6 UUJ
0.72 UEJ
1620
0.96 U
17.6 NJ

997 EJ

7000

2.6 UNJ

8.0 NJ
361
0.15 B
6.3 NJ
12400
30.0 EJ
j|
2
4.0 B
j|
12
560
EJ
jj
6
||
24
20100
||
1
433
5680
|| 1176
205 NJ
||
4
0.99 *J
j|
0.2
||
9
43.3
388 B
|| 1176
||
1 | 0.71 UUJ
||
2 | 0.71 UEJ
j| 1176 | 1650
0.94 U
jj
2
22.0 NJ
||
12
900 EJ
jj
5

II

o |

INORGANIC ANALYSIS OF Si
Kenosha Iron and Hetal- Case * 20908

1

inu
LUW

|| |
|

SOIL
CRDL

|| X Solid
|| 84.7

|| X Solid
II
88.3

|| X Solid

|| X Solid

II 82.2

|| 80.5

|| X Solid
|| 80.6

......

1

| (corrected sample
| (corrected sample
|| corrected
sample
| (corrected sample
|| corrected
sample
1 1 CRDL
concentration) | CROL
concentration) | CRDL
concent rat ion 1 1 CRDL
concentration
concentration) | CRDL

| Analyte
(Aluminum
(Ant imony
(Arsenic
(Barium
(Beryll ium
(Cadmium
(Calcium
(Chromium
(Cobalt
(Copper
(Iron
(Lead
(Magnesium
(Manganese
(Mercury
(Nickel
(Potassium
(Selenium
(Silver
(Sodium
(Thallium
(Vanadium
(Zinc
[Cyanide

PAGE 3 OF 4

1
| (LocationTraffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt *| (Location Traffic Rpt #|
HSIO
MEST50
||S11
MEST51
||S12
HEST52
||S13
HEST54
HEST53
||S14

1
1
1
1
1
1
11

)

Rec'd 9/29/93 by AATS- LA

40
12
2
40

1
1
1000
2

||
||
||
|

47
14
2
47

II
1
II
1
|| 1181
II
2

10 ||
5 ||

12
6

20 ||

24

1 1
1
1000 || 1181
3
4
0.2
0.2
8
9
1000
1181
1
1
2
2
1000
1181
2
2
10
12
4 ||
5

II

o

:=======£=£==========:

6320
2.6 UNJ
6.1 NJ
160
0.51 B
8.4 NJ
13600
37.9 EJ
6.4 B
842 EJ
33500
535
3360
261 NJ
1.4 *J
81.7
651 B
3.5 UWJ
0.71 UEJ
1530
0.94 U
21.2 NJ
1200 EJ

| | 45
jj
14
I)
2
11
45
||
1
||
1
jj 1133
||
2
||
11
||
6
j|
23
||
1
|| 1133
||
3
||
0.2
||
9
|| 1133
||
1
||
2
|| 1133
||
2
||
11
||
5

II

o

4700
2.5 UNJ
8.2 NJ
154
0.88 B
6.1 NJ
15000
18.0 EJ
10.3 B
103 EJ
15500

408
6970

| | 49
||
15
||
2
| | 49
||
1
||
1
jj 1217
||
2
||
12
||
6
| | 24

||

519 NJ ||
0.11 U*J ||
30.8
||
615 B
0.68 U
0.68 UEJ
1630
4.5 UEJ
18.5 NJ
894 EJ

1

|| 1217

4
0.2
10

jj 1217
||
1
||
2
|| 1217
j|
2
||
12
|| 5

II

o

:======s=±=r ======£==£===:

12000

| | 50

2.7 UNJ
12.2 NJ
933
1.9
1.2
33400
34800
17.8
8790
105000
3380
4.6
3.2

UNJ

EJ
EJ

U
UNR

3.9 *J
411
864 B
0.73 UWJ
1010 EJ
2060

0.97 U
1.2 UNJ
1.7 UEJ

||
||
j|
||

15
2
50
1

27300

11

50

2.7 UNJ 1)

15

3560

2.7 UNJ

11.0 BSNJJj
2
4.5 NJ
79.1
749
| | 50
1.5
||
1
0.53 B
1.6 NJ
1.2 UNJ ||
1
||
1
|| 1242
29400
||
1241
57400
11
2
35500 EJ | | 2 10.8 EJ
25.6
I)
12
0.99 U
||
12
69.7 EJ
6
||
6 22000 EJ 1 1
31300
|j
25 117000
||
25
95.1
||
1
3290
||
1
32300
I) 1242
4.7U
|| 1241
3.2 UNR ||
4
235 NJ
||
4
0.12 U*J
jj
0.2
1.4 *J ||
0.2
14.4
||
10
4030
jj
10
604 B
710 B || 1241
|| 1242
3.7 UWJ
3.9 BWJ ||
1
||
1
0.74 UEJ
1030 EJ j j
2
jj
2
|| 1242
1600
||
12411800
0.99 U
0.99 U ||
2
||
2
14.7 NJ
1.2 UNJ ||
12
I)
12
6840
EJ
j
|
5
182 EJ
||
5

II

o

II

°

INORGANIC ANALYSIS OF SOIL

Kenoshe Iron and Metal- Case * 20908

Rec'd 9/29/93 by AATS- LA

PAGE 4 OF 4

| (Location(Traffic Rpt #| | Location
(Traffic Rpt «| (Location Traffic Rpt *| (Location (Traffic Rpt #| (Location Traffic Rpt *|
||S15
JHEST55
||S16
JMEST56
JJS17
HEST58
| |S20
MEST57
JJS18
NEST60
JIL
(OL

|| X Solid
|| 83.7 I

|| X Solid |
II 86.4 I

|| X Solid
II 81.6

|| X Solid DUPLICATE
II 79.2 (OF S17

|| X Solid
|| 78.4 I

| (corrected sample
| (corrected sample
|| corrected
sample
| (corrected sample
| (corrected sample
| | CRDL
concentration) | CRDL
(concentration) | CRDL
concent rat ion 1 1 CRDL
concentration) | CRDL
concentration

JAnalyte

===== =r=======r== IS==========£====E===S=ZZ i=======:===r===j==:===r=r=::===cc======r=====c====== =i================r====== .B===r=r==s===

(Aluminum
|Ant imony
(Arsenic
(Barium
|B?rytIium
(Cadmium
(Calcium
|Chro<nium
| Cobalt
(Topper
11 ron

11 ead
(Magnesium
| Manganese
(Mercury
(Nickel

(Potassium
(Selenium
(Silver
(Sodiun
| Thai Iium
) Vanadium
(Zinc
(Cyanide

40 ||
12 ||

2
40
1
1
1000
2
10
5
20
1
1000
3
0.2
8
1000
1
2
1000
2
10
4

48
14

146000
| | 46
3400
2.6 UNJ ||
14
2.5 UNJ
7.9
SNJ
||
2
4.5
NJ
II
2
| | 48
1420
| | 46
129
1.5
||
1
0.39 B
II
1
1.2 UNJ ||
1
2.4 NJ
II
1
(I 1195
26200
||
1157 73300
34100 EJ ||
2
13.5 EJ
II
2
||
12
25.1
||
12
1.3 B
||
6
26300 EJ 1 1
6
127 EJ
2.2U
||
23
||
24
18900
2440
11
1
171
II
1
|| 1195
4.5 U
|| 1157
36100
3.1 UNR II
3
420 NJ
||
4
1.4 «J ||
0.2
0.12 U*J
||
0.2
1480
11
9
14.4
||
10
1030 B
|| 1157
700 B
|| 1195
3.6U
||
1
3.5
UEJ
II
1
1000
EJ
||
2
0.69
UEJ
II
2
1650
|| 1157
1580
|| 1195
0.96
U
|
|
2
0.93
U
II
2
14.4 NJ
1.2 UNJ ||
12
||
12
||
5
7760 EJ ||
5
323 EJ

II

o

II

o

| | 49
||
15
||
2
11
49
||
1
||
1

1010

2.7 UNJ
2.8 NJ+
98.0
0.12 B
5.1 NJ
|| 1225
9230
39.7 EJ
||
2
2.2 B
||
12
||
6
780 EJ
17900
||
25
279
||
1
3730
|| 1225
||
4
181 NJ

||
||

||

0.2

1.3 *J
36.4
1225 170 B
3.7UWJ
1
10

||
||
2
0.74 UEJ
||
1225410 B
||
2
4.9 UEJ
||
12
3.5 BNJ
607 EJ
||
5

II

o

||
51
937
||
15
4.0 BNJ
||
3
8.1 SNJ
90.0
||
51
||
1
0.10 U
||
1
6.3 NJ
5130
|| 1263
||
3
58.7 EJ
||
13
3.5 B
11
6
530 EJ
j | 25
38500
||
1
211
||
1263
2320
I)
4
270 NJ
||
0.3
(I
10
(1 1263
||
1
||

3

|| 1263
||
||
||

II

3
13
5

o

||
||
15
||
3
||
51
||
1
||
1
j j 1276
||
3
||
13

51
2130
2.8 UNJ
0.77 U+NJ
108
0.10 U
27.7 NJ
5880
1010 EJ
20.3
||
6 2770 EJ
55800
||
2
6
501
||
1
1210 B
|| 1276
689 NJ
||
4
1.7*J I)
0.3
4.1 *J
1230
41.1
||
10
231 B
163 B || 1276
3.8 UUJ ||
1
3.8 UUJ
1.8 BEJ
0.76 UEJ ||
3
527 B
502 B
(I 1276
5.1 U
5.1 U ||
3
150 NJ
4.3 BNJ ||
13
1860 EJ
589 EJ j j
5

II

o

Kenosha Iron and Metal- Notes on Organic Qualifiers
General Information
This package includes eighteen soil samples (and two duplicate samples) that
were collected for the complete Target Compound List (TCL) analyses of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and
PCB/pesticides. Data summary tables will not include undetected compounds.
A number of samples were re-analyzed because internal standard recoveries were
not within QC limits. These samples were re-analyzed and this re-analysis is
identified by the -RE suffix on the traffic report number. In instances where
the re-analysis recoveries were better (more standards within QC limits), the
results from this re-analysis are used. Where there is no improvement in
recoveries, the original analysis is used.
A number of samples were quantified at concentrations exceeding the linear
range of the instrument. These samples were diluted and re-analyzed and are
identified by the -DL suffix. Results from these re-analyses are reported
only for those compounds that exceeded the range of the original analysis.
Field QC
Sample S02(EXB42) is a field duplicate of sample S01(EXB41).
Sample S18(EXB58) is a field duplicate of sample S17(EXB57).
Sample S19(EXB59) is a background sample.
VOCs
Positive results are estimated (J) and non-detected results are estimated
for the following compounds due to calibration outliers:

(UJ)

Chloromethane for samples S04(EXB44), S05(EXB45), S06(EXB46),
S07(EXB47), S08(EXB48), S09(EXB49), S10(EXB50), S11(EXB51), S12(EXB52),
S13(EXB53), S14(EXB54), S15(EXB55), S16(EXB56), and S17(EXB57)
Acetone and 2-Butanone for samples (EXB58), (EXB59), (EXB60), and the
re-analyses of samples S05(EXB45RE) and S17(EXB57RE)
The volatile method blanks associated with samples S01(EXB41), S02(EXB42),
S03(EXB43), and the re-analyses of samples S05(EXB45RE) and S17(EXB57RE)
contain the common laboratory contaminant, Methylene Chloride. The presence
of Methylene Chloride in any of these samples is flagged (U), undetected, when
the concentration is less than ten times the concentration in the associated
blank.
The volatile method blank associated with samples S04(EXB44), S05(EXB45),
S06(EXB46), S07(EXB47), S08(EXB48), S09(EXB49), S10(EXB50), S11(EXB51),
S12(EXB52), S13(EXB53), S14(EXB54), S15(EXB55), S16(EXB56), and S17(EXB57)
contain the common laboratory contaninants Methylene Chloride and Acetone.
Positive results for these compounds are flagged (U), undetected, when the

concentration in the sample is less than ten times the concentration in the
associated blank.
The volatile method blank associated with samples S18(EXB58), S19(EXB59), and
S20(EXB60) contains the common laboratory contaminants Methylene Chloride,
Acetone, and 2- Butanone. The presence of these compounds is flagged (U),
undetected, when the concentration in the sample is less than ten times the
concentration in the associated blank.
Surrogate recoveries were high outside QC limits for samples S05(EXB45),
S17(EXB57), and the re-analysis of sample S05(EXB45RE). Positive results for
these samples are estimated (J), and non-detected results do not need to be
qualified.
Two internal standards were recovered low outside the required QC limits for
samples S05(EXB45), and S17(EXB57RE). Positive results for the following
compounds are estimated (J) and non-detected results are estimated (UJ):
Chloromethane; Bromomethane; Vinyl chloride; Chloroethane; Methylene chloride;
Acetone; Carbon disulfide; 1,1-Dichloroethene; 1,1-Dichloroethane; 1,2Dichloroethene (total); Chloroform; 1,2-Dichloroethane; 2-Hexanone; 4-Methyl2-pentanone; Tetrachloroethene; 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane; Toluene;
Chlorobezene; Ethylbenzene; Styrene; and Xylene (total).
One internal standard was recovered low outside QC limits for sample
S17(EXB57). Positive results are estimated (J) and non-detected results are
estimated (UJ) for the following compounds: 2-Hexanone; 4-Methyl-2-pentanone;
Tetrachloroethene; 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane; Toluene; Chlorobezene;
Ethylbenzene; Styrene; and Xylene (total).
All three internal standards were recovered low outside QC limits for sample
S05(EXB45RE). Positive results for this sample are estimated (J) and nondetected results are estimated (UJ).
SVOCs
Positive results are estimated (J), and non-detected results are estimated
(UJ) for the following compounds due to calibration outliers:
Benzo(k)flouranthene for samples S01(EXB41), S02(EXB42), S03(EXB43),
S06(EXB46), S07(EXB47), S09(EXB49), S17(EXB57DL), and S19(EXB59)
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate and Di-n-octyl phthalate for samples
S01(EXB41RE), S02(EXB42RE), S06(EXB46RE), S09(EXB49RE), S16(EXB56;
EXB56RE), S17(EXB57), S18(EXB58; EXB58DL), and S19(EXB59DL)
The medium level soil SVOC method blank contained the common lab contaminants
Di-n-Butylphthalate, bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate, and 10 tentatively identified
compounds (TICs). Positive result for the TCL compounds are flagged (U),
undetected, when the concentration is less than ten times the concentration in
the associated blank. Positive results for the TICs are flagged (U),
undetected, when the concentration is less than five times the concentration
in the associated blank. The following samples are affected: S04(EXB44),
S05(EXB45), S08(EXB48), S10(EXB50; EXB50RE), S11(EXB51; EXB51RE), S12(EXB52;

EXB52RE), S13(EXB53; EXB53RE); S14(EXB54; EXB54RE), S15(EXB55), and S20(EXB60;
EXB60RE).
The low level soil SVOC method blank contained the common lab contaminant Din-Butylphthalate and four TICs. Positive results for Di-n-Butylphthalate are
flagged (U), undetected, when the concentration is less than ten times the
concentration in the associated blank. Positive results for the TICs are
flagged (U), undetected, when the concentration is less than five times the
concentration in the associated blank. The following samples are affected:
S01(EXB41; EXB41RE), S02(EXB42; EXB42RE), S03(EXB43), S06(EXB46; EXB46RE),
S07(EXB47), S09(EXB49; EXB49RE), S16(EXB56, EXB56RE), S17(EXB57, EXB57DL),
S18(EXB58, EXB58DL), and S19(EXB59, EXB59DL)
MS/MSD recovery of 2,4-Dinitrotoluene is high outside QC limits. The presence
of this compound in the unspiked sample, S03(EXB43), is estimated (J).
The recovery of one internal standard was low outside QC limits for the
following samples: S01(EXB41; EXB41RE), S02(EXB42; EXB42RE), S03(EXB43),
S06(EXB46; EXB46RE), S09(EXB49; EXB49RE), S10(EXB50; EXB50RE), S11(EXB51;
EXB51RE), S12(EXB52; EXB52RE), S13(EXB53; EXB53RE), S14(EXB54; EXB54RE),
S15(EXB55), S16(EXB56; EXB56RE), S17(EXB57; EXB57DL), S18(EXB58), S19(EXB59;
EXB59DL), S20(EXB60; EXB60RE). Positive results for the following compounds
are estimated (J) and non-detected results are estimated (UJ): Pyrene;
Butylbenzyl phthalate; 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine; Benzo(a)anthracene; bis(2Ethylhexyl)phthalate; and Chrysene.
In addition, another internal standard was recovered low outside QC limits for
the following samples: S01(EXB41; EXB41RE), S02(EXB42; EXB42RE), S15(EXB55),
S20(EXB60; EXB60RE). Positive results for the following compounds are
estimated (J) and non-detected results are estimated (UJ): Di-n-octyl
phthalate; Benzo(b)fluoranthene; Benzo(k)fluoranthene; Benzo(a)pyrene;
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene; Dibenz(a,h)anthracene; and ^enzo(g,h,i)perylene.
Lastly, one internal standard was recovered below 10Z for the following
samples: S06(EXB46; EXB46RE), S16(EXB56; EXB56RE), S17(EXB57; EXB57DL),
S18(EXB58). Positive results are estimated (J), and non-detected results are
unusable (R), for the following compounds: Di-n-octyl phthalate;
Benzo(b)fluoranthene; Benzo(k)fluoranthene; Benzo(a)pyrene; Indeno(l,2,3cd)pyrene;Dibenz(a,h)anthracene; and Benzo(g,h,i)perylene.
PCB/Pesticides
A surrogate recovery for sample S19(EXB59DL) was recovered low outside QC
limits. Positive results for this sample are estimated (J) and non-detected
results are estimated (UJ),
Surrogate recoveries for samples S01(EXB41DL). S02(EXB42DL), S11(EXB51),
S14(EXB54; EXB54DL), S15(EXB55, EXB55DL), S16(EXB56), S19(EXB59DL), and
S20(EXB60DL) were recovered outside QC limits. Positive results for these
samples are estimated (J) and non-detected results are unusable (R).
Surrogate recoveries for samples S01(EXB41), S02(EXB42), S03(EXB43),
S04(EXB44; EXB44DL), S05(EXB45). S06(EXB46), S07(EXB47), S08(EXB48),
S09(EXB49), S10(EXB50), S11(EXB51DL), S12(EXB52; EXB52DL), S18(EXB58),

S19(EXB59), S20(EXB60) were low outside QC limits. Positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detected results are estimated (UJ).
Surrogate recoveries for sample S13(EXB53DL) were low outside QC limits.
Positive results are estimated (J) and non-detected results do not require
qualification.
MS/MSD recovery of Heptachlor was OX; Aldrin, Endrin, and 4,4'-DDT were
recovered at less than 10X. The MS recovery of gamma-BHC (lindane) was OX and
the MSD recovery was high outside QC limits. Positive results for the
afforementioned compunds in the unspiked sample S15(EXB55) are estimated (J)
and non-detected results are estimated (UJ).
The relative percent difference between the MS and the MSD for Dieldrin is
extremely high outside QC limits. Positive results for this compound in the
unspiked sample, S15(EXB55), are estimated (J) and non-detected results are
estimated (UJ).

PAGE 1 OF 2

1
[VOLATILE ANALYSIS

1)

|

II

OF SOIL

I1 I1
II

1

|Kenosha Iron and Metal
|Case * 20908
i
1
|Rec'd 9/29/93

LOW

|by Encotec

SOIL

I

p

o

TIC's

o

(I

TIC's

II

(Traffic Rpt •II
PH
(EXB59
HN.A.

PH

HN.A.

m
CRUL

(Location
(S19

|| X Solid (Description
II
80 (BACKGROUND
1||1

(Location
1 (SOI

I
I

TIC's

(Traffic Rpt •II pH
(EXB41
I I N.A.

(Location
1 (S02

I
I

(Traffic Rpt •II
(EXB42

TIC's (location
1 |S03

pH
N.A.
I

|| TIC's
II

(Traffic Rpt •II
PH
JEXB43
HN.A.

(Location

1 (S04
(Traffic Rpt *
(EXB44

I) X Solid (Description I I X Solid (Description I I X Solid (Description (1 X Solid (Description
71 JDUP S01
89 |
II
82 I
II
78 1
II
II

|
|(ug/Kg)| (corrected) Sample | (corrected) Sample |
| (corrected) Sample
corrected) Sample
I I corrected) Sample
| | CROL(Concentration) | CROL (Concentration) | CROL (Concentration)
CROL (Concent rat ion 1) CROL (Concentration
1
| ==================================
============ -============= ============ ============= === SZ===3Z=E=S=========== = = ======================= =========== ===============

i
i
i
i

(Acetone
| 2 Butanone
|Tetrachloroethene
(Toluene

| 10.0
II
1
II
1
II
I
II
1
II
| 10.0
II
1
II
1
II
I
1
II
II
| 10.
1
II
I
1
I I0
1
II
II
II
| 10.
II 0
12 1
«•»
II
1
II
I
II
1
II
!================================== ============ ============= ============ ====e======zz zzz====================== === ====================== =========== ====I=r========
N.A.-

NOT AVAILABLE

I

I"
|
I

OF SOIL

1
(Kenosha Iron and Hetal
|Case * 20908
I

1
(Rec'd 9/29/93
|hy Encotec
i
1
1
1
t|
= _=
(Acetone
( ?- Butanone
| TetracMoroethene

(Toluene

|| TIC's (Location
II TIC's0 (Location
I I TIC's (Location
0
(S08
JS07
II
o (S09
II
II
II
pH
(Traffic Rpt •II
(Traffic Rpt *
(Traffic Rpt •II
pH
(Traffic Rpt •II
(Traffic Rpt •II
1
PH
PH
PH
N.A.
(EXB48
(EXB49
(EXB46
N.A.
(EX847
HN.A.
(EXB45
HN.A.
|N. A.
II
II
| X Solid[Description I) X Solid (Description II X Solid (Description I I X Solid (Description || X Solid (Description
II
90 1
II
83 1
II
72 1
II
II
i
| TIC's (Location
1
2 (SOS

(VOLATILE ANALYSIS

LOW
SOIL
CROL

|| TIC's

(Location

2 JS06

84 |

82 |

1

| (corrected) Sample
Sample
corrected] Sample
<ug/Kg)| (corrected) Sample
| (corrected) Sample ||
I I corrected)
| CROL (Concentration) | CRQL | Concent rat ion 1 1CROL (Concentration) | CROL (Concent rat ion 1) CROL (Concentration
10.0 I I
10.0 1
10.0 I I
10.0 II

I
I
I
U

I

3 J

II
II
II
II

I
I
I
I

II
II
II
II

I
12 |
I
I

II
2 J II
II
II

1
1
1
1

II
II
II
II

I
I
I
I

I = = = = = == £ = E = = 3 = = = == = = = = = = = = = E = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = S = = = = = = = = = 5 = = = = = = = = = XESEEE = = E = SSS = = = £S = = = a = X = E3 = ==C = = = = = = r = = = ± = E = EE = = E = = S = = = = = = 3 = = aEEXCC = E = E = = = = r = = = = = = X = E = EEEK = =S

N . A . - NOT AVAILABLE

PAGE 2 Of 2

1
(VOLATILE ANALYSIS
|

II
II

OF SOIL

TIC'S

1

M _.

(Kenosha Iron and Metal

II

|Case 0 20908

||N.
_ _ A.

1
| Rec'd 9/29/93
|by Encotec
1
1
1

| Acetone
|?-Butanone
| letrachloroethene
| Toluene
N.A.-

|| TIC's

(Traffic Rpt «(( pH
(EXB50
HN.A.

(Location

|| TIC's

(Trarfic Rpt «((

IEXBSI

pH

HN.A.

(Location
(S12
(Traffic Rpt
JEXB52

|| TIC's

II
•II PX
HN.A.

o

(Location
|S13

|| TIC'S (Location
II
o |SH

[Traffic Rpt •II PH
JEXB53
HN.A.

(Traffic Rpt •
(EXB54

M
LOU
II « Solid (Description || X Solid (Description || X Solid (Description || X Solid (Description || X Solid (Description
SOIL II __
83 1
II
88 |
|| 82I
II
80 I
II
85 I
CRQL
(ug/Kg)||co rrectec | Sample
| (corrected)
Sample
| (corrected) Sanple
| (corrected) Sample
| (corrected)
Sample
CROL (Concentration) | CRQL (Concentration) | CROL (Concentration) | CRQL (Concentration) | CRQL (Concentration

M

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0

II
II
II
II
II

1
1
12 1
1

*J
U

II
II
II
||

1
1
1
11 |

II
II
II
1 J ||

1
1
1
12 |

II
1
II
1
II
1
2J ||

1
1
1

II
II
II

|

|

||

NOT AVAILABLE

IVOIATILE ANALYSIS
|

(Location
(S10

OF SOIL

II TIC's
II
I
I'll
||N.A.

(Location
|S15

|| TIC'S (Location
0 |S16
||

|| TIC's (Location
II
0 (S17

|| TIC's (Location
(1
0 (S18

II
II

TIC's

(Location
(S20

I

I
(renosha Iron and Hetal
[Case * 20908
Rec'd 9/29/93
by Encotec

(Traffic Rpt *|| pH
(EXB55
||lJ.A.

(Traffic Rpt *|| PH
(EXB56
HN.A.

(Traffic Rpt «(( pH
HN.A.
(EXB57

(Traffic Rpt *(( pH
(EXB58
HN.A.

(Traffic Rpt *
JEXB60

Ii
I'LOU
Solid [Description || X Solid (Description (1 X Solid (Description II x Sol id (Description
ll x Solid (Description |X |
(1
81 |DUP S17
80 1
87 |
SOIL I I
84 I
II
83 |
II
II
CRQL
•
||co rrected | Sample
Sample
| (corrected)
Sample
| (corrected) Sample
| (corrected)
Sample
(ug/K g) | (corrected)
|| CRQL (Concentration) | CROL |Cori:entretion| | CROL (Concentration) | CROL |Concentriti<m|| CROL (Concentration

I

!3XXK=

Ai ptone
? Butanone
let rachloroethene
Toluene
N.A.-

NOT AVAILABLE

10.o II
10.o II
10.o II
10.0 II

12 I
12 I
I
12

29 B | |
7 J ||
II

I
I
I

II
II
II
II

I
I
I
12 I

1 J

II
II
II
II

1
1
1
12 I

6J

II
II
II
II

1
1
1
12 1

3 J

PAGE 1 OF 4

1
ISEHIVOLATILE ANALYSIS
|

|| TIC's
II
18
||
II
II
PH
II
7.8

OF SOIL

i1
|Kenosha Iron and Metal
|Case * 20908
1
1
|Rec'd 9/29/93
|by Encotec
i
1
1
1

LOW
SOIL

Location
S19

|| TIC's (Location
I)
19 |S01

Traffic Rpt *|| pH
EXB59
||

|| X Solid Description
||
80 BACKGROUND

|| TIC's Location
||
18 S02

Traffic Rpt *))
8.0
EXB41
jj

|| X Solid Description
| | 82
I

pH

|| TIC's

||

|| TIC's Location
||
9 S04

Traffic Rpt *
Traffic Rpt *|| pH
EXB44
EXB43
j
|
7.4
7.8

Traffic Rpt *|| pH
7.8 EXB42
||

|| X Solid Description
II
71 1

Location

17 S03

Description
| | X Solid
II
89 I

|| X Solid Description

II

78

(ug/ICg) 1 1 corrected Sample
|| corrected Sample
|| corrected
Sample
|| corrected
Sample
| (corrected Sample
|| CROL Concentration) | CRQL Concentration) | CRQL Concentration) | CROL Concentration | | CROL Concentration
I — E2 = = ZSSZS = = ;S = = ~~ZSSZCSS
5S»E£SSSESSXXXXKS:5C — SSZS"-=ZSS££SX3S5vSSSS~SZS£ZC5:

|Phenol

|<.-Methylphenol
1 1 ,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
{Naphthalene
| ?-Methy (naphthalene
(Dimethytphthalate
JAcenaphthalene
| Acenapthene
|Dib«nzofuran
|Diethylphthalate
|Fluorene
|N-Ni trosodiphenyl amine
|Phenanthrene
(Anthracene
jCarbazole
| F luoranthene
|Pyrene
|Butylbenzylphthalate
| Benzo( a) anthracene
|(hrysene
|bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
|0i N Octyl Phthalate
| Benzo(b)f luoranthene
(Renzo(a)Pyrene
| 1 dcno( 1,2,3- cd)pyrene
|D ib*nz(a,h) anthracene
|Benzo(g,h, i )perylene
i
,--- — ,«=- .
.
.
.

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

||
||
||
||
||
||
||
820
120
||
||
||
||
||
||
820
710
||
820
450
630
||
820
||
820
4200
|| 1600
5800
150
||
820
||
820
1300
||
820
4300
|
820750
|
|
1600 6300
| 820
1400
|
820 640
||
820
76
||
820
590

II
1
1
190 J
| 800
|
800
290 J

J

1
| 800

II
II
II
||
1)
II

460
460

220 J

(I

"0

39 J

||

200 J

||
||

460

II

800

170 J

||

460

||

800

110 J

II
||

460

J
J
J

II
11
||
||
||
||

800
800
800
800

30 J
89 J

||
||
II
44 J ||
II
46
7200 | |
78 J ||
67 J ||

II
||
||
460
||
460
||
460
550
1100 J
||
460
120 J
||
460
340 J
||
460
460 J
||
460
1400 J
||
460
||
460
43 J
730 J
2600 J | | 460
1200 J ||
460
300 J
110 J
390 J I)
460

II
2100
||
800
190 J
||
800
260 J
||
800
1900
||
800
3700 J
DJ | |
800
J
||
800
130 J
1000 J
J ||
800
1400 J
J | | 800
1300 J
J ||
800

D

450 J

II
||

370

II

||
II

J
J
J

II
II
II
130 J | | 370

460

170 J

II
II
II
||
||

13000
13000

1000 J

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
1400
J ||
37

13000

2800 J

13000
13000
13000
13000
13000

1000 J
1000 J
1400 J
770 J
2200 J

13000

1800 J

45 J
80 J

120 J
||
370
140 J
j|
370
2300 J
||
370
62 J
||
370
120 J
||
370
440 J
||
370
29 J
||
370
190 J
||
370
60 J
||
370

II
II
||
||
|I
IJ
||
||
||
||
||

||
II
||

II
II
II

1300 J

:=a~=csx=s=ssxssxsx££S==r=:===S==SSS=====— 2S3S=SS=":±±=SK==£===SSBEaE£~=SS=SI KXXZXC&==S===

PAGE 2 OF 4

(| TIC's

SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS

Kfnosha Iron and Metal
Case * 20908
Rec'd 9/29/93
by Encotec

(Location

LOU
SOIL
root
LKWL

| | TIC's [Location
|1
20 |S06

|| TIC's (Location
||
17 |S07

Location

|| TIC's

||
3
II
1
1
[Traffic Rpt *| 1
[Traffic Rpt *\\ pH
| Traffic Rpt *| ) pH
PH
II
PH
|1
||
7.7 EXB47
||
7.8
7.8 EXB46
II
7.8 EXB45
II
11
|| X Solid [Description || X SolidDescription || X Solid Description |) X Solid
||
72 1
83 1
II
82 I
II
W
11
I I . -|
...
|
-...
13 (SOS

OF SOIL

|S08

|| TIC's

Location

17 S09

||

I Traffic Rpt *||
pN
EXB48
||

traffic Rpt »
EXB49
8.0

Description || X Solid Description
I
II
*>

| Sample
| (corrected
<ug/Kg)| (corrected | Sample |(corrected | Sample
|| corrected
| Sample
| (corrected
( Sample
Concentration] | CROL Concentration)) CROL Concentration) | CROL Concentration) | CROL Concentration
||
CROL
Phenol
4 Methylphenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenz*ne
Naphthalene
? Me thy (naphthalene
[Mmethylphthalate
Acenaphthalene
Acenapthene
nibcnzofuran
Diethylphthalate
F luortne
v Hi trosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
F luoranthene
Pyrene

Butylbenzylphthalate
6enfo(a)anthracene
Chrysene

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
)i N-Octyl Phthalate
Ben;o(b)f luoranthene
Ben?o(a)Pyrene
ldeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
3 ibenz( a, h) anthracene
)enzo(g,h, i )perylene
IB*

330 ||
330 |
330 |

II
II
II

330 | UOOO
330 | UOOO
330 |
330 |

860 J
1700 J

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

UOOO
UOOO
UOOO
UOOO

||
||
||

||
||

32 J

400

400

38J

||

II

||
| UOOO
| UOOO
|

|

750
1400

II

330 |
330 (|
330 ||
330
330
330
330

400
400

UOOO
UOOO

400

280 J

400

79 J

2100 J
4000 J

||
II
||
II
||

400
1300
86J
400
400
49 J
400
440
1500 J
400
1500 J
1600 J
|
400
86 J
1
400
440 J
1000 J ||
400700 J
1700 J ||
|
400
380 J
I

400
120 J
||
||
140
||
40
0J
||
400
150 J
74 J
||
400
||
400
71 J
110 J
||
400
||
400
230 J

I1
890 R
1600 J ||
400
370 JR
950 J || 400
160 JR
1 | 400

II
||
400
| | 400
||

11
1 | 400

II
230 JR ||

190 J
79 J

II
II
II
II
||
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
|f

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

12000

980 J

II
II
||
||
||
||
||
||
II
||
||

12000

II
II
II

========== ==S5===B=====a=

700 J

370
370

120 J
150 J

370
370

37 J
62 J

II

370

42 J

II
||
II
II
II
II
II

370
370
370
370
370
370

II
II
II
II

370
370
370

630
90 J
87 J
690
1000 J
210 J
440 J
560 J
390 J

||
II
II

370
370
370

1300
450
170 J

370

160 J

II

II

PAGE 3 OF

1
ISEHIVOLATILE ANALYSIS
|

II

OF SOIL

TIC's

II
||
11

i1
|Kenosha Iron and Metal
|Case # 20908
l
1
|Rec'd 9/29/93
|by Encotec
l
1
1
1

II

II

LOU
SOIL

PH

Location
|S10
1

|| TIC's Location
||
13 |S11

Traffic Rpt #| | pH
EXB50
||
7.8

|| X Solid Description
||
83

|| TIC's Location
||
9 S12

Traffic Rpt *||
6.9
EXB51
||

|| X Solid Description
II
88

pH

|| TIC's

||

Traffic Rpt *|| pH
7.7 EXB52
||

|| X Solid Description
II
82

Location

13 S13

Traffic Rpt #| | pH
7.7
EXB53
||

|| X Solid Description
II
80

|4-Hethylphenol
1 1 , 2 , 4 • T r i eh I orobenzene
(Naphthalene
|2-Methylnaphthalene
JDimethytphthalate
|Acenaphthalene
|Acenapthene
|0 ibenzofuran
|Diethylphthalate
|Fluorene
|N Ni trosodiphenylamine
|Phenanthrene
|Anthracene
(Carbazole
|F luoranthene
|Pyrene

|Butylbenzylphthalate
|Benzo( a) anthracene
|Chrysene
|bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
|Di-N Octyl Phthalate
|Benzo(b)f luoranthene
|Benzo(a)Pyrene
| ldeno( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
|Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
|FJenro(g,h, i )perylene

Traffic Rpt #
EXB54
7.8

|| X Solid Description
II
85

(ug/Kg)| (corrected
Sanple
|| corrected
Sample
|| corrected
Sanple
|| corrected
Sample
| (corrected Sample
_
|
|
CRQL
Concentration)
j
CRQL
Concentration
Concent
rat
ion
1
1
CRQL
Concentration)
|
CRQL
Concent
rat
i
on
1_1_ _______
CRQL ______________
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
___
.-_-,-__________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
___ __._.

.__ __

s

-------

|Phenol

|| TIC's Location
||
10 S14

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||

II
II
II
12000

790 J

|| 11000
|| 11000
II
II
II
|| 11000

12000

12000
12000
12000
12000

12000

1000 J

1000 J
1300 J
680 J
980 J

1800 J

II
II
II
|| 11000
II
II|| 11000
|| 11000

II
|| 11000

|| 11000
II
II
|| 11000
II
II
II
II

II
II
II
3300 J
4900 J

||
(I

940 J

II
II
II
||
II
II

3700 J

1400 J
1600 J
1100 J
1200 J

11
[I
11
j|
||
||
j|
||
I)

12000
12000

12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000

II
II
880 J

n
n
n
n

730 J
1700 J

II
II
II
||
||

2400
5500
1300
750
7100
9100
1500
5500
6700

II
II
II
II
II
II
||
|| 12000
|| 12000
|| 12000
|| 12000
|| 12000
||
||
| | 12000

J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J

12000

|| 12000
| j 12000
| | 12000

II
II
6000 J || 12000
4000 J | |
4000 J | | 12000

II
11

4400 J

12000

II
||

890 J

||

3300 J

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
||

12000

1300 J

1000 J | |
940 J
3800 J
3600 J

||
||
||

12000
12000

II
II
2600 J | |
II
II
5800 J | |

3100 J

II
||
II
II

900 J
1400 J

PAGE 4 OF 4

1
ISEHIVOLATILE ANALYSIS
|

TIC's

OF SOIL

II
II
11
1
II
I

Ii
[Kpnosha Iron and Hetal
(Case * 20908
i1
|»ec'd 9/29/93
|by Encotec
I1

1
1
(Phenol

|4 Hethylphenot
| 1 ,?,4-Trichlorobenzene
(Naphthalene
\2 Me thy (naphthalene
(nimethylphthalate
|Acenaphthalene
(Acenapthene
|[i ibrnzofuran
,'i'ipthylphthalate
| F luorene
|N Ni trosodiphenylamine
|Phenanthrene
| Anthracene
jfarbazole
|Fluoranthene
| Pyrene
(Butylbenzylphthalate
|Bpruo( a) anthracene
|l hrysene

|his(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
|ni-N-Octyl Phthalate
|Benzo(b)f luoranthene
|8enzo(a)Pyrene
| Idrnod ,2,3-cd)pyrene
|D ibenz(a.h) anthracene
|Benzo(g,h, i Jperylene

| Local ion

20 (SIS
PH

|| TIC's (Location
||
17 |S16

(Traffic Rpt *||
||
8.5 (EXB55

pH

|| TIC's Location
||
19 [S17

|| TIC's Location
||
16 S20

|| TIC's (Location
||
19 (SIB

[Traffic Rpt #| |
pH
'Traffic Rpt #||
7.8 EXB56
||
8.0 EXB57
I)

pH

[Traffic Rpt #|| pH
8.0 (EXB58
||

Traffic Rpt »
EXB60
7.9

v

1
LOU
SOIL

|| X Solid 'Description
||
84 I

|| X Solid 'Description

|| X Solid Description

II

II

87

83 I

|| X Solid Description

II

81 DUP S17

|| X Solid Description

||

80

|| corrected
Sample
|| corrected
Sample
(ug/Kg) || corrected
Sample
|| corrected
Sample
| (corrected Sample
| | CROL Concentration) | CRQL
Concentration) | CRQL Concentration | | CROL Concentration
Concent rat ion || CRQL

330 ||
330 ||
330 ||
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

||
||
||
||
||
||
||
(1
||
||

12000
12000

1400 J
1600 J

II
II
II
|(

12000

2100 J

||

12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000

||
||
||
||

380
380
380
380
380

86 J
100 J
47 J
21 J
59 J

II
II
II

330 ||
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

II
II
II
||
I)

4900
13000
3100
4500
2800
18000

6200 J

12000

4700 J

II
||
||
||
||
||

400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400

29 J

1)

410

69 J
28 J
220 J
420

||
||
|j
||

410
410
410
410
41

J
J
J
J
J

II
||
||
||
||
||

46
67
170
67
65

°
410
410
410
410

58 J
64 J
46 J

||
||
||

220 J

||

J
J
J
J
J

||
||
||
||
||

57 J

II
||

400
36
43
62
160

II
||

||
||
I)
||
||
||
||
||

400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400

150
79
1000
3700
610
800
1200
1900

J
J
J
J
J

II
||
||
j|
||
(1
||
||
||
(1

II
||

380
380
380

II
830 R ||
500 R ||
320 JR ||

400
400
400

1800 R
790 R
550 R

II
||
||
||

410
410
410

1300 R
580 R
480 R

II
||
||
||

II
II

380

II
360 JR | |

660 R
400

II
||

410

400 JR

II
11

||
II
II

II

380
380
380

530

85 J
43 J
410
J ||
380
2100
J ||
380 J
J
350 J
J
380
550 J
J
380
220 J
BJ
380

12000

||
||
||
||
||

||

1100
400

J
J

410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
4100

1000

120 J
59
610
3100
470
610
880
25000

J
J
J
J
J
DJ

12000

1700 J

||
|| 12000
| | 12000
|| 12000
||
||
||
11
12000

810 J
3000 J
5200 J

4400 J

PAGE

1
IPCB/PESTICIDE ANALYSIS

II

|

UN.A.

OF SOIL

TIC's

i1
|Kenosha Iron and Metal
|Case * 20908
1
1
|Rec'd 9/29/93 by
|Encotec
l
1
1
1

II
II

i1 i1

Location

|| TIC's

Location

|| TIC's

S19

||N.A.

soi

j |N. A.

Location
S02

|| TIC's
| |N. A.

Traffic Rpt #| | pH
Traffic Rpt *| | pH
Traffic Rpt f|| pH
jj
8.0 EXB41
j | 7.8 EXB42
||

PH

|| X Solid Description
||
80 BACKGROUND

CROL

||

|| X Solid Description
| | 82

|| TIC's
||N.A.

Traffic Rpt #||
EXB43
||
7.8

7.8 EXB59

LOW
SOIL

Location
S03

pH

1 Of

Location
S04

Traffic Rpt »
7.4 EXB44

|| X Solid Description

|| X Solid Description

|| X Solid Description

II

II

II

71

89

78

Sample
|| corrected
(ug/Kg)| (corrected
|| corrected
Sanple
| (corrected Sample
| (corrected Sample
Sample
| | CROL Concentration) | CROL Concentration) | CROL
Concentration | | CROL Concentration
Concent rat ion 1 1 CROL

|delta-BHC
|ganma-BHC (Lindane)
|Heptachlor
(Aldrin
JHeptachlor epoxide
(Endosulfan 1
(Die Idrin
|4,4'-DOE

•7 (1
•7 ||
•7 II
•7 II
•7 ||
1.7 ||
3.3 ||
3.3 ||

|Endrin

3.3
3.3

||
||

3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3

||
||
||
||
||

|Endosutfan II
|4,4'-OOD
[Endosulfan sulphate
|4,4'-DDT

|Endrin keytone
|Fndrin aldehyde
[alpha-Chlordane
|ganma-Ch(ordane
|Arochlor-1248
|Arochlor-1254
|Arochlor-1260
1 " = = = = = r = = = = = = = = £ = = = = = = = = £E =

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

2.1
2.1

12 PXJ (1
5.5 PXJ ||
II

2.1

4.1

210 DJ ||
6.9 PXJ ||

160
4.0

4.1
4.1
82
4.1

12
5.6
300
17

24 PXJ ||
4.6
15 PJ
260 DJ
380 DJ | |
190
11 PXJ ||
7.2 PXJ
II
4-6
13 PXJ
21 PXJ ||
4.6

82

1.7 II
1.7
33.0
33.0
33.0

||
||
||
||

41
41

PXJ
PXJ
DJ
J

II
||
||
||
||
II

II
II
120 PJ | |
II
300 PJ | |

II
II
II

4.0
4.0

1500 DJ

II
11

4.0

33 PXJ

II
11

40
40
40

890 J
930 J
500 J

II
II
||
||
||

2.4

190

II
II
II
11 PXJ ||

1200 DJ

II
II
II
II

II
II

1-9

||

3.7

| | 19
II
3.7
||
||
3.7
II
||

19

II

II
II
II
46
46
46

490 J ||
420 PJ | |
190 J ||

3.7

37
37
37

2.2

14 PXJ

2.2

22 PXJ

II
20 PJ ||
120 D ||
14 PXJ ||

4.2
4.2
4.2

50 J
24 PXJ
33 PXJ

II
8.5 PXJ ||
II
210 DP ||
II

4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2

6.4 PXJ ||

7.8 PXJ ||
II
II
480 PJ 1 1
740 PJ 1 1
100 PJ j |

4.2

42

13
7.3
90
8.9
21

PXJ
J
PJ
PXJ
PXJ

1400 PJ
«,„„„««

PAGE 2 OF

1

IPCB/PESIICIDE ANALYSIS
I OF sou
1l

|| TIC'S

JKenosha Iron and Metal
|Casr # 20908
11

II
P"
II
7.8
II
11
|| X Solid
||
72

|Rec'd 9/29/93 by
|Encotec
11

LOU
SOIL

Location
| SOS

|| TIC's [Location
| |N. A. S06

Traffic Rpt *| | pH
EXB45

||

|| TIC's [Location
JJN.A.

Traffic Rpt *||

7.8 EXB46

||

|S07

pH

|| TIC's
JJN.A.

[Traffic Rpt *||
7.7 [EXB47
||

Location

|| TIC's

SOB

IJN.A.

Location
S09

Traffic Rpt #
Traffic Rpt l|| pN
||
8.0 EXB49

pH

7.8 EXB48

Description || X Solid Description || X Solid Description || X Solid Description || X Solid Description
II
90 1
I
II
83 1
II
82 1
II
84

(ug/Kg) | [corrected Sample
| (corrected
| (corrected Sample
[ Sample
|| corrected Sample
| (corrected Sample
||
CRQL
Concentration) | CRQL Concent rat ion (1 CRQL Concentration) | CRQL Concent rat ion || CROL Concentration

1
1
(del ta-BHC
| gamma -BHC

||N. A.

(Lindane)

|Heptachlor
|Aldrin
|Heptachlor epoxide
|E ndosulfan 1
|Dieldrin
|4,4'-DOE
|Endrin
|E ndosulfan II
|4,4'-DDD
(Endosulfan sulphate
|4,4'-ODT
(fndrin keytone
JEndrin aldehyde

(atpha-Chlordane
| gamma -CMordane

1.7
-7
•7
.7

||
||
||
||

•7
•7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
1.7
1.7

||
||
||
|j
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||

2.4

II

37 PXJ ||
II
II

2.0

4.6
4.6
4.6

51 J ||
20 PXJ ||
51 PJ ||

4.0
4.0

4.6

II
8.3 PXJ ||

4.6
4.6
4.6

II
50 PXJ ||
4.0
8.8 PJ ||
4.0
23 PXJ | |

2.4

|Arochlor-1248

33.0 ||

46

]Arochlor-1254
| At or hi or- 1260

33.0
33.0

46
46

||
||

II
6.8 PXJ ||

II
II
II
8.5 PJ ||

II
II

II

II
II
II

2.1

9.7 PJ

||

5.3 PXJ ||

4.0

16 J

||

16

7.2 PJ ||

4.0

280 D

||

16

II

4.0

4.4 PXJ j|

16

II
II

4.0

13 PXJ ||

II
II

II
II
1700 J ||
1400 PJ | |
180 PJ | | 40

1

34 J
5.4 J

75 PJ

II
|(
||

II

II
16

II
40

460 D

II
II

2.1

II

2.1

55 J
44 J

II
II
||

40

180 PJ

I)
II
II
||
||

39

||
II
II

160
160
160

1«

II
1-9
II
II
1-9
II
110 PJ ||
130 PJ | |
50 PXJ (I
3.7
II
3.7
20 PXJ ||
3.7
II
3.7

4.2 PXJ
21 J

160
68
11
5.3
43

PJ
PXJ
PXJ
PXJ
PXJ

500 DP ||
3.7
II
55 PXJ
19 PXJ ||
3.7
II
II
1600 D
3900 J | |
730
4000 PJ | j 730 12000 DP
320 PJ | |
730
1800 D

SXKX«E3MXKXSESSZE = S = = =:c
I ============

PAGE 3 OF A

1
IPCB/PESTICIDE ANALYSIS
|

OF

|| TIC'S
IIN.A
||
11

SOIL

i1
{Kenosha Iron and Metal
|Case # 20908
11
|Rec'd 9/29/93 by
|Encotec

11
1
1
|delta-BHC
| gamma -BHC
{Heptachlor
[Aldrin
|Hcptachlor
|Endosulfan
|0if Idrin
|4.4'-ODE
|Endrin
[Endosulfan

II

II

LOU
SOIL

PH

Location

|| TIC's

sio

||N.A.

Traffic Rpt *||
||
7.8 EXB50

|| X Solid Description
||
83

pH

(Location
|S11

|| TIC's
||N.A.

Traffic Rpt «||
6.9 EXB51
I)

|| X Solid Description
II
88

pN

Location
S12

|| TIC's
||N.A.

Traffic Rpt «||
7.7 EXB52
||

pH

Location
S13

|| TIC's
||N. A

Location
S14

Traffic Rpt *
Traffic Rpt *|| pH
j | 7.8 EXB54
7.7 EXB53

|| X Solid Description

|| X Solid Description

|| X Solid Description

II

II

II

82

80

85

Sample
| | correctedSample
|| corrected
Sample
|| corrected
Sample
| (corrected Sample
(ug/Kg)| (corrected
| | CROL Concentration) | CRQL
Concent rat ion 1 1 CROL
Concent rat ion || CRQL
Concentration
Concent rat ion 1 1 CROL

(Lindane)

epoxide
1

II

1 1>, 4 '-ODD

|Endosulfan sulphate
|4,4'-DOT
JEndrin keytone
JEndrin aldehyde
(alpha-Chlordane
| gamma - Ch I ordane
|»rochlor-1248
|Arochlor-1254
|Arorhlor- 1260

.7

(1

•7
•7
-7
-7
1.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
1.7
1.7
33.0
33.0
33.0

||
||
II
II
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||

2.0

6.5 PXJ ||

II
II
II

II
II

2-0

17 PXJ ||
II
II
II
II
47 J ||

4.0
4.0
4.0

18 PXJ Jl
7.7 PXJ ||

4.0

II
II
II
37 PXJ ||

40
40
40

II
II
1400 J ||
1200 PJ | |
510 PJ (I

1.9

21 PJ

I-'

8.9 J

3.7
3.7

3.7
3.7
3.7

37
37
37

||
II
||
II
II

26 PXJ | |
12 PJ ||

13 PJ

II
II
||

2.1

40

4-0
4*0
4.0

13 PJ ||
3.8 PXJ ||
II
II
530 PJ ||
340 PJ | |
200 PJ | |

40
40
40

69 PXJ

II
II
II
11

II
II
II

II
II
II
II
490 DPJ | |

16

II
13 PXJ ||
8.6 PXJ ||
37 PJ ||

16
16
16

16

98

190
29
22

II
II
II
P ||
II
P ||
II
P ||
PX ||

100 PX

50
II
16
150
II
16
II
II
4300 PJ | | 410 19000
8800
4900 PJ | |
410
5900
800 J
jj
410

||

2.0

12 PJ

3.9

9.0 PJ

3.9

8.8 PXJ

3.9

19 PXJ

P ||
PX | |
II
3.9
II

3.9 PXJ

DJ | | 39
DPJ | |
DJ | |

350 PJ

=============

PAGE 4 OF 4

1
IPCB/PESTICIDE ANALYSIS

|| TIC'S

|

KN.A.

Of SOIL

I]
ItCenosha Iron and Metal
|Case « ?0908
|
1
|Rec'd 9/39/93 by
(Encotec
11

II

II

PH

LOW
SOIL

|| X Solid (Description
||
84 I

CKUL

| |
!

3.3

||

JEndrin

3.3

| Endosulfan II
|4,4'-DDD
|Endosulfan sulphate
|4,4'-DDT
|Endrin keytone
|fndrin aldehyde
(alpha-Chlordane
|qsmna-Chlordane

3.3

II

Sample

I

87 I

II

•7
.7

||
||

100

.7

||

100

4800 PXJ 1 1
950 PXJ | |

•7
3.3

||
||
||

200

II
II
38
II
38
1600 PXJ | |

||

200

3.3

||

200

3.3

||
||
||

3.3

||

1.7

||

1.7

||

200
200

|Arochlor-1248

33.0

||

79000

|Arorhlor-1254

33.0

||

79000

|Arorhlor-1260

33.0

||

79000

= — - = = = - = = = = = " £===========£======
== =

Location
(S17

|| TIC's
| |N. A.

Traffic Rpt *||
EXB57
8.0 ||

|| X Solid [Description

II

II
II
II
II
II
II

II
II
II

||

•7

3.3

|| Tie's
| |N. A.

83

pH

Location
[S18

|| TIC's
| |N. A.

Location

S20

Traffic Rpt *| | pH
Traffic Rpt #
||
7.9 EXB60
8.0 EXB58

|| X Solid [Description
II
81 DUP S17

|| X Solid Description
||
80 1

Sample
| (corrected Sample
|| corrected
| (corrected
'
Sample
| (corrected Sample
| CRQL
Concentration) | CRQL Concentration) | CRQL Concent rat ion 1 1 CRQL Concentration

•7

3.3

[Location
S16

|| X Solid (Description

Concentration)
CRQL

| |

|delta-BHC
|gantna-BHC (Lindane)
(Heptachtor
{Aldrin
JHeptachlor epoxide
| Endosulfan 1
|Dieldrin
| 4. 4 '-ODE

|| TIC'S
| |N. A.

(Traffic Rpt *| | pH (Traffic Rpt *| | pH
||
7.8 EXB56
||
8.5 (EXB55

(ug/K9) | (corrected

1
1

I r = = ?=: =

[Location
|S15

16 J
23 J

550 PXJ | |
210 PJ ||
II
420 PXJ ||
II
650 PJ | |
II
II
620000 DJ | |
350000 DJ | |
44000 DJ | |

38

II
II
II
20

11

||
||

40
40

100 PX | |

II
II

*0

390

II
II

«o
*o

||
(1
||

8.4

II
II

33 JP | | 40
II
«0
II
*0
II
II
380
1000 J

340 PX

II
II
II

400
400
400

:rs===s==s=s=ss==2Sss=t===

16

96 PX | j

jj

16
16
16

47 P

II
))

42 P

||

210 P

||

120 PX | (
210 P
||

23000
9900 P
3200

15 PXJ ||
21
II
21
II
56 PXJ | | 41
II
200 J ||
41
69 PXJ | |
26 PJ (I
41

16
16
16

II
110 PXJ ||
41
59 PXJ | | 41
110 PJ ||
41

II
II
II
II
||
410
15000 DP | | 1600
9000 DP (I 1600
||
410
||
160
1700 J || 1600

40 PXJ
100 PXJ

290 J
360 PXJ
45 PJ

360 PXJ
270 PXJ
490 PXJ

61000 DJ
19000 DPJ
16000 DJ

:vExxKex*«vcs«EHE=rr=EX=::====s===s==s=

SAMPLING REPORT FOR
SCREENING SITE INSPECTION/PATHWAY SAMPLING
KENOSHA IRON AND METAL
Kenosha, WI
U.S. EPA ID#WID988574257

Prepared by:

O^-A
\\feMJuU^J^V
Date:
Bill Ramsey
Wisconsin Department^ f Natural Resources

The purpose of this report is to document the performance of a screening
site inspection by employees of the State of Wisconsin, who, under a
cooperative agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, are
authorized to take action for the purpose of determining the need for a
response (Section 14(e) (1), SARA, 1986).

Sampling Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
Introduction
A total of eighteen soil samples and two duplicates were collected during the
SI. Seven soil samples were collected from private residences; ten soil
samples were taken from locations on site; and one soil sample was taken from
a park a block away to servbe as a background sample.
Except for variations in this report, all activities were conducted in
accordance with the sampling plan prepared for the September 28 investigation.
Personnel
Robert Amerson

Soil sampling
Field monitoring
Decontamination

Kate Soriano

Soil sampling
Field monitoring
Decontamination

John Krahling

Soil sampling
Field monitoring
Decontamination

Bill Ramsey

Offsite Support
Sample Preservation
Sample Packaging
Sample Shipping
Documentation
Safety Officer

Denise Helgoland

Asbestos sampling
Field Monitoring

Pre-sampling Activities
Bill Ramsey and John Krahling arrived at the Kenosha Iron and Metal site the
day before the inspection to mark sampling locations.
The following morning, Bill Ramsey and John Krahling arrived at the site at
nine a.m., at 9:30 a.m. they were joined on site by Robert Amerson, Kate
Soriano and Denise Helgoland of the WDNR Southern District Air Management
program. Ms. Helgoland was on hand to assist in the collection of soil
asbestos samples that are being used on the site to determine whether there is
any threat posed to area residents from airborne contaminants.

Sampling Activities
The following is a description of where and when each sample was taken on the
site.

Sampling Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
S20

OTR# EXB60 ITR# MEST60
/
Collected on site; 14 ft. due south of residence at foundation midpoint.
Collection time: 1740
Photo #: 6

Asbestos Samples
In addition to samples S09, S10, Sll, S14, S16, and S17, five additional
samples were taken from areas that Ms. Helgeland identified as having a high
probability of containing asbestos. These samples were labelled S51 through
S54.
Sample Locations
All sample locations are included on a map with this report.
Sample Analysis
All samples collected were scheduled through the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP) for volatile organic compounds, semi-volatiles, pesticides/PCB's
and total metals, except the asbestos samples. Asbestos samples were analyzed
using polarized light microscopy at the State of Wisconsin Lab of Hygeine.
Sample Traffic Reports and Chain of Custody
Custody of samples was relinquished to Bill Ramsey, sample custodian. Organic
soil samples were sent to Encotec, of Ann Arbor, MI. Inorganic samples were
sent to AATS, of Baton Rouge, LA.

Sampling Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
501

OTR# EXB41 ITR# MEST41
Collected in the backyard of 2007 55th St; 7 feet south of the building.
Collection time: 11:00
Photo #'s: 24

502

OTR# EXB42 ITR# MEST42
Duplicate of sample # SOI
Collection time 11:08

503

OTR# EXB43 ITR# MEST43
Collected in the backyard of 2001 55th St.; 8.7 ft. south of the
building. Collection time: 11:30.
Photo #: 23

504

OTR# EXB44 ITR# MEST44
Collected in the backyard of 1933 55th St.; 9.5 ft. south of the SW
corner of the building.
Collection time: 12:00
Photo #: 22

505

OTR# EXB45 ITR# MEST45
Collected in the backyard of 1929 55th St.; 6 ft. south of building.
Collection time: 12:15
Photo #: 21

506

OTR# EXB46 ITR# MEST46
Collected in the backyard of 1923 55th St.; 3 ft. south of building and
11 ft. SW of SW corner of building.
Collection time: 12:45
Photo #: 20

507

OTR# EXB47 ITR# MEST47
Collected in the backyard of 1913 55th St.: 4 ft. south of SE corner of
building.
Collection time: 13:00
Photo #: 19

508

OTR# EXB48 ITR# MEST48
Collected in the backyard of 5506 19th Ave.; 25.3 ft. due west of SW
corner of building.
Collection time: 13:25
Photo #: 18

509

OTR# EXB49 ITR# MEST49
Collected on site; N of RR track, SE corner of property, 16.7 ft west of
sidewalk.
Collection time: 14:50
Photo #: 15

510

OTR# EXB50 ITR# MEST50
Collected on site; N of RR tracks, 68 ft. N of Kenosha liquors

Sampling Report
Kenosha Iron and Metal- WID988574257
Collection time: 15:10
Photo #: 13
511

OTR# EXB51 ITR# MEST51
Collected on site; 26.5 ft. S/SE of 1913 55th St.
Collection time: 1440
Photo #: 16, 17

512

OTR# EXB52 ITR# MEST52
Collected on site; 53' south of middle of south wall of 1913 55th St.
Collection time: 1500
Photo #: 14

513

OTR# EXB53 ITR# MEST53
Collected on site; 79.5 ft. due south of 1929 55th St.
Collection time: 1620
Photo #: 10

514

OTR# EXB54 ITR# MEST54
Collected on site; north of RR tracks and 137 ft. south of 1929 55th St.
Collection time: 16:00
Photo #: 12

515

OTR# EXB55 ITR# MEST55
Collected on site; 48 ft. south of SE corner of 1933 55th St.
Collection time: 1720
Photo #: 7

516

OTR# EXB56 ITR# MEST56
Collected on site; 110 ft. south of SE corner of brown shed at 2007 55th
St.
Collection time: 1600
Photo #: 13

517

OTR# EXB57 ITR# MEST57
Collected on site; 27ft. south of southwest corner of brown shed at 2007
55th St.
Colection time: 1640
Photo #: 16 (placard incorrectly labelled)

518

OTR# EXB58 ITR# MEST58
Duplicate of sample S17
Collection time: 1640
Photo #: 17 (placard incorrectly labelled)

519

OTR# EXB59 ITR# MEST59
Background; Columbus Park, near light post at SW corner of paved parking
lot (corner of 54th St. and 22nd Ave.).
Collection time: 1750
Photo #: 5

5
'

...5o.
^oo(

_al

^.

0

p

6^
0

(^

"

b

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY

DESCRIPTION:

V

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:

f * , ( \ -S

SITE:

k

/ • •• r ;
/ f ':
. '

PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

--7

¥-

DATE:
SITE:

UJL--

PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

'•(**"

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:

{—
^ x L;i.

SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

X

~ /" _ \ r ~~7
r- A/ ."U-

DATE :

SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

i 1 i "S

ST

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

C '

*-'1-^*

DESCRIPTION:

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

Si I (

L.I\£-.
S

^

S -

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

t?9

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

0
DESCRIPTION:

- 110

<5t:

DATE:

? fzy f ^ '5

SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

27-

-*^.-4£

— ST.

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

0.

DATE:
SITE:
PHOTOGRAPHED BY:

DESCRIPTION:

/ _
\ ^ "

^V-t-><^v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:

March 22, 1994
Kenosha Iron And Metal Site/ Kenosha, Wisconsin
Request for a Health Consultation
Charles Gebien OSC
Robert Williams, ATSDR

As we discussed today, this is a request for an ATSDR Health
Consultation of the subject site.
Attached is a site referral package for a U.S. EPA removal
evaluation at the site from Bill Ramsey of WDNR. We have
scheduled a removal assessment for March 30, 1994 with TAT and
the WDNR.
Bill Ramsey has indicated that the State can perform the health
consultation if ATSDR would prefer. If you wish to contact
Bill, his phone number is 608 264-8962, or my number is 312
353-7645.